green
Positive treatment
8.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Richard G. Naas
But see United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d *1137 940 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981) (permitting increase in legal sentence even after service has commenced).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Gomberg
Ct. 3055, 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981), that the Constitution does not forbid a district court from resentencing a defendant de novo and imposing a more severe sentence if it so chooses. 6 To avoid the necessity for remands, the general sentencing procedure recommended in Gomez should be followed in cases where a defendant convicted under section 848 is also found guilty of conspiracy or substantive offenses.
cited
Cited "see"
Rice v. Comtek Manufacturing of Oregon, Inc.
Accord U.S. v. Saunders, 641 F.2d 659 , 663— 64, n. 1 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Beringer v. O'Grady
See United States v. Rios, 637 F.2d 728, 729 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3054 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981); Petrucelli v. Smith, 544 F.Supp. 627, 632-33 (W.D.N.Y.1982), rev’d on other grounds, 735 F.2d 684 (2d Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronald Kelly v. E. Calvin Neubert, Administrator, and W. Carey Edwards, the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey
See United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d 940 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981). 1 He simply says that the trial court violated his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process when, on remand, it increased some of the sentences on individual counts without articulating legitimate reasons for doing so.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. MacGillivray
See United States v. Fredenburgh, 602 F.2d 1143, 1148 (3rd Cir. 1979), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d 940, 953 (3rd Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Shue
See United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d 940, 947 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick Henry Earley
(2×)
See United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d 940, 951 (3d Cir.1981) ("the Court has applied the Double Jeopardy Clause only when the defendant has satisfied the punishment imposed" (emphasis original)), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981). 24 80 In United States v. Benz, 282 U.S. 304 , 51 S.Ct. 113 , 75 L.Ed. 354 (1931), the Supreme Court found no finality in an excessive sentence.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilton A. Welch, Jr., and Wilton A. Welch, III
An agent’s interview notes are not “statements” of the witness unless the witness “signed or otherwise adopted or approved” the report, 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (e)(1), or the notes were “substantially verbatim reports” of the witness interview. 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (e)(2); see United States v. Cole, 617 F.2d 151, 153 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981); United States v. Gaston, 608 F.2d 607, 611 (5th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garry Jordan
See United States v. Basic, 639 F.2d 940, 948 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981); Batum v. United States, 409 F.2d 433 , 440-41 & n. 36 (D.C.Cir.1967), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 916 , 89 S.Ct. 1765 , 23 L.Ed.2d 230 (1969); Walton v. United States, 202 F.2d 18, 19-20 (D.C.Cir.1953); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3568 (1982) (repealed effective Nov. 1, 1987) (sentence runs from date defendant committed to detention).
discussed
Cited "see"
Honey v. People
See United States v. Rios, 611 F.2d 1335 (10th Cir.1979) (trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to admit an opinion regarding the truthfulness of the witnesses’ family when the opinion did not deal specifically with the witnesses), cert, denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3054 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981); CRE 401, 602. “[Ojpinion testimony is a personal assessment of character.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dorothy Jefferson
Accord, United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d 940, 948 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Bullock Henry, A/K/A Imari Abubakari Obadele, United States of America v. Wayne James, A/K/A Offoga Quaddus, and Thomas Norman, A/K/A Hekima Ana
(2×)
See United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d 940 (3d Cir.1981), on remand from 446 U.S. 398 , 100 S.Ct. 1747 , 64 L.Ed.2d 381 (1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry
See United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d 940 (3d Cir.1981), on remand from 446 U.S. 398 , 100 S.Ct. 1747 , 64 L.Ed.2d 381 (1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School District
See United States v. Saunders, 641 F.2d 659, 663 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981); Lorin, 700 F.2d at 1206.
discussed
Cited "see"
Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School District
See United States v. Saunders, 641 F.2d 659, 663 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981); Lorin, 700 F.2d at 1206 . 11 This court has held that a district court with responsibility to make an ultimate decision based on a magistrate's recommendation under Sec. 636(b)(1)(A) should consider the legal issues involved.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Thompson
See United States v. Cole, 617 F.2d 151 , 153 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Murdock Head, (Two Cases)
See United States v. Rios, 637 F.2d 728, 729 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3054 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981); United States v. Opager, 616 F.2d 231 , 236 n. 13 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Heymann, 586 F.2d 1039, 1040 (5th Cir.1979) (Hill, J., concurring).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guyer v. State
The Court then held Hunter inapplicable to the Fullman facts, since Fullman had not begun to serve his sentence on the attempted robbery charge at the time of his resentenc-ing. 6 Moreover, this Court found that the imposition of the increased term of imprisonment posed no double jeopardy problems. 431 A.2d at 1263 ; see United States v. Busic, 3d Cir., 639 F.2d 940, 953 , cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marino, Alfonso
(2×)
See generally United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d 940 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter A. Hagler
See United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d 940 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981); see also North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 , 89 S.Ct. 2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John D. Rogers
See also United States v. Saunders, 641 F.2d 659, 665 (9th Cir.1980) (where statement of deceased witness was contradicted by the testimony of two prostitutes, “the prejudicial effect of the deceased witness’s missing testimony was indefinite and speculative”), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981). *476 In the instant case, it is not clear that the deceased Miller would have testified, especially because he invoked his Fifth Amendment right in declining to testify before the grand jury.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Damond Greg Goggins
See, e.g., United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d 940, 949-50 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas
See, e.g., United States v. Cole, 634 F.2d 866, 868 (5th Cir.) (no violation of Jencks Act where agent’s notes destroyed in good faith), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S. Ct. 3055 , 69 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hodgkiss
See, e.g., United States v. Cole, 634 F.2d 866, 868 (5th Cir.) (no violation of Jencks Act where agent’s notes destroyed in good faith), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S. Ct. 3055 , 69 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Cross-Appellants v. James David Thornbrugh, Cross-Appellee
Compare United States v. Rios, 611 F.2d 1335, 1343 (10th Cir.1979) (disapproving prosecutor’s expression of personal belief in defendant’s guilt), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3054 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Kotz
See Commonwealth v. Ford, 315 Pa.Super, 241, 461 A.2d 1281 (1983); see also United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d 940 (3rd Cir.1981), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The United States v. James Beros, Titus McCue A/K/A Tim McCune Appeal of James M. Beros
See, e.g., United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d 940 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981) (holding that where convictions on some counts of multi-count indictment vacated, remand for *468 resentencing on remaining valid counts does not violate double jeopardy, and district court’s imposition of a sentence that accords with the statutes on which appellant was validly convicted does not violate the Constitution even if the total length of the sentence imposed on remand is equal to or greater than the sentence originally given).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul H. \Bud\" Holmes"
(2×)
See, e.g., Busic v. United States, 446 U.S. 398 , 100 S.Ct. 1747 , 64 L.Ed.2d 381 (1980), on remand, United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d 940 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981); United States v. Rosen, 764 F.2d 763 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 806 , 88 L.Ed.2d 781 (1986); United States v. Jefferson, 760 F.2d 821 (7th Cir.), vacated, 474 U.S. 806 , 106 S.Ct. 41 , 88 L.Ed.2d 34 (1985), opinion after remand, 782 F.2d 697 (7th Cir.1986); United States v. Heredia-Fernandez, 756 F.2d 1412 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 836 , 106 S.C…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Ervin Dekle, Dwight Ragans, and Ronald Mangle, Defendants
See, e.g., U.S. v. Cole, 634 F.2d 866 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sigfredo Rivera-Sola, A/K/A Freddy
Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. at 267-68 , 96 S.Ct. at 552-53 (citation omitted); see also United States v. Saunders, 641 F.2d 659, 663 (9th Cir.1980) (Supreme Court has allowed magistrates to perform even “inherently judicial” tasks when under supervision of an Article III judge), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981); In re Establishment Inspection of Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Co., 589 F.2d 1335, 1340-41 (7th Cir.) (footnote omitted) (“The only limitations on section 636(b)(3) are that the duties be consistent with the Constitution and federal laws and t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles E. Roemer, II and Carlos Marcello
See, e.g., United States v. Cole, 634 F.2d 866, 867 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981); United States v. Medel, 592 F.2d 1305, 1317 (5th Cir.1979); United States v. Cathey, 591 F.2d 268,274 (5th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dale Matthew Olson v. Leslie Green, Chairman of Minnesota Board of Corrections, and Warren Spannaus, Attorney General of the State of Minnesota
See also United States v. Rios, 611 F.2d 1335 , 1339 n.4 (10th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3054 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981); United States v. Heffner, 420 F.2d 809, 813-14 (4th Cir. 1970); cf. Harrison v. United States, 392 U.S. 219, 224-25 , 88 S.Ct. 2008, 2011 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1047 (1968) (defendant’s trial testimony inadmissible in retrial unless Government demonstrates that introduction of illegally obtained confession in first trial did not induce defendant’s testimony).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Busic
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-6379.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 8, 1981.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.