green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.4 score
“the unspoken message is that the prosecutor knows what the truth is and is assuring its revelation.”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Burke v. United States
the unspoken message is that the prosecutor knows what the truth is and is assuring its revelation.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Shawn Joaquin Smith, AKA \S-Man\""
(2×)
See United States v. Roberts, 618 F.2d 530 (9th Cir.1980) (government may not place its prestige behind a witness’ testimony), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 942 , 101 S.Ct. 3088 , 69 L.Ed.2d 957 (1981); United States v. Garza, 608 F.2d 659 (5th Cir.1979) (improper for prosecutor to assert to jury that government has no interest in convicting innocent people).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmy F. McEachern
See United States v. Roberts, 618 F.2d 530, 535 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 942 , 101 S.Ct. 3088 , 69 L.Ed.2d 957 (1981) (“The plea agreement may be portrayed fully and placed in context so the jury is not misled about its terms or importance.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
(2×)
Because I believe that the state failed to demonstrate the presence of the exigent circumstances necessary to establish an exception to the warrant requirement of the fourth amendment regarding the police station parking lot search of the defendant’s automobile; see State v. Johnson, 183 Conn. 148 , 438 A.2d 851 , cert. denied, 452 U.S. 942 , 101 S. Ct. 3089 , 69 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Greyson v. Kellam
See also, United States v. Roberts, 640 F.2d 225, 227-28, 230-31 (9th Cir.) (Norris, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 942 , 101 S.Ct. 3088 , 69 L.Ed.2d 957 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Greyson v. Kellam
See also, United States v. Roberts, 640 F.2d 225, 227-28, 230-31 (9th Cir.) (Norris, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 942 , 101 S.Ct. 3088 , 69 L.Ed.2d 957 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Guadalupe Singleterry and Juan Antonio Singleterry, United States of America v. Juan Antonio Singleterry
See also United States v. Roberts, 640 F.2d 225, 227-28 (9th Cir.) (assuming, without discussion, that double jeopardy bar may apply when prosecutorial misconduct has caused a reversal but not a mistrial), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 942 , 101 S.Ct. 3088 , 69 L.Ed.2d 957 (1981). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Curtis, III
See also United States v. Roberts, 640 F.2d 225, 230-31 (9th Cir. 1981) (Norris, J., dissenting, addressing issue not reached by majority opinion), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 942 , 101 S.Ct. 3088 , 69 L.Ed.2d 957 (1981); United States v. Rios, *775 637 F.2d 728, 729 (10th Cir. 1980); Commonwealth v. Potter, 478 Pa. 251, 259 , 386 A.2d 918, 922 (1978); Westen & Drubel, Toward a General Theory of Double Jeopardy, 1978 Sup.Ct.Rev. 81, 103.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thorne
v.
Warden, Virginia State Penitentiary
v.
Warden, Virginia State Penitentiary
No. 80-6556.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 15, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.