Bauer-Smith Dredging Co. v. United States, 368 U.S. 819 (1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Bauer-Smith Dredging Co. v. United States, 368 U.S. 819 (1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
209 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 41 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Michael M. v. Bd. of Educ. of NYC School Dist. (nyed, 1988-05-27) · Strongest negative: United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Radiation Technology, Inc. (njd, 1981-08-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Radiation Technology, Inc.
D.N.J. · 1981 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Vulcanized Rubber & Plastics Co., 288 F.2d 257 , 258-59 n. 2 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 38 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Michael M. v. Bd. of Educ. of NYC School Dist.
E.D.N.Y · 1988 · confidence medium
Id. at 83 (citations omitted).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Atlantic City Electric Company v. General Electric Company (2×)
2d Cir. · 1962 · confidence medium
The opinion in that case was concerned with the applicability of the concealment doctrine to a state statute of limitation 'borrowed' for the purpose of an action under the Clayton Act, see id. at 82, 83, and was decided on the ground that, although the doctrine applied, the complaint did not allege sufficient facts to give the plaintiff the benefit of it.
cited Cited "see" Leonhard v. United States
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80 (2d Cir.), cert.denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961).
cited Cited "see" Leonhard v. United States
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961).
cited Cited "see" Ashland Oil Co. v. Union Oil Co.
Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor, Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961). .
cited Cited "see" David Weinberger, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Retail Credit Company
4th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80, 87-88 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961).
cited Cited "see" City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell Corporation
2d Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Company, 288 F.2d 80, 87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. JB Williams Company, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See notes 7 and 8 supra. That case is United States v. Vulcanized Rubber & Plastics Company, 178 F.Supp. 723 (E.D.Pa.1959), aff’d, 288 F.2d 257 (3d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 38 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961).
cited Cited "see" William Ortiz v. J. Edwin Lavallee, as Agents of the State of New York
2d Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80, 83 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961). *915 in.
discussed Cited "see" Saylor v. Lindsley
S.D.N.Y. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 ; Janigan v. Taylor, 344 F.2d 781, 784 (1st Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 879 , 86 S.Ct. 163 , 15 L.Ed.2d 120 ; Tobacco & Allied Stocks v. Transamerica Corp., supra 143 F.Supp. at 328 and 329.
discussed Cited "see" Middle Atlantic Utilities Co. v. S. M. W. Development Corp.
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
DeLuca v. Atlantic Refining Co., 176 F.2d 421, 424 (2 Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 943 , 70 S.Ct. 423 , 94 L.Ed. 581 (1950); see, Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80 , 90 A.L.R.2d 252 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961).
discussed Cited "see" Saylor v. Lindsley
S.D.N.Y. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80 , 90 A.L.R.2d 252 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961); Tobacco & Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corp., 143 F.Supp. 323, 328-329 (D.Del.1956), aff’d 244 F.2d 902 (3d Cir. 1957); 3 Loss, Securities Regulation p. 1776.
discussed Cited "see" Ohio Valley Electric Corp. v. General Electric Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80, 87 , 90 A.L.R.2d 252 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961): Even if no affimative act of concealment is required in restraint of trade conspiracy cases, see Dawson [Fraudulent Concealment and Statutes of Limitation, 31 Mich.L.Rev. 875 (1933)] at 880, 907-08; American Tobacco Co. v. People’s Tobacco Co. [ 204 Fed. 58 (5th Cir. 1913)]; cf. 63 Harv.L.Rev. at 1221, in contrast to the usual rule when there is no fiduciary relationship, a point we do not decide * * *.
cited Cited "see" Donald A. Swan v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York by Gustave G. Rosenberg, Its Chairman, George A. Pierson, and Margaret v. Kiely
2d Cir. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See Movie-color, Limited v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80, 86-88 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961).
cited Cited "see" Cinnamon v. Abner A. Wolf, Inc.
E.D. Mich. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See Judge Friendly’s excellent discussion of this point in Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Co. (C.A.2, 1961), 288 F.2d 80 , cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 .
cited Cited "see" Atlantic City Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 1962 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80, 88 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 26 (1961).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Carbone v. Gulf Oil Corp.
Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Moviecolor Limited v Eastman Kodak Co. 288 F2d 80, 83 (CA2), cert. denied, 368 US 821 , 7 L Ed 2d 26 , 82 S Ct 39 (1961); Fulton v. Loew’s Inc. 114 F Supp 676, 678-682 (Kans 1953); Electric Theater Co. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 113 F Supp 937, 941-942 , (WD Mo 1953); Wolf Sales Co. v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co. 105 F Supp 506, 509 (Colo 1952).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sentry Corporation and Sne Corporation v. Ethel R. Harris, as Trustee Under Trust Agreement Dated March 1, 1973
7th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Moviecolor, Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F.2d 80, 83-84 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 39 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961); see also Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1 , 33 & n. 100 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985); cf. Burnett v. New York Central R.R., 380 U.S. 424, 435 , 85 S.Ct. 1050, 1058 , 13 L.Ed.2d 941 (1965) (adopting uniform tolling rule in FELA action).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Ralph Mercado
2d Cir. · 1973 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Mohammed, 288 F.2d 236, 243 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 820 , 82 S.Ct. 37 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961); United States v. Whitaker, 395 F.2d 664 (4 Cir. 1968).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." David Rettinger v. Federal Trade Commission
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Vulcanized Rubber & Plastics Co., 288 F.2d 257 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821 , 82 S.Ct. 38 , 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961); Vulcanized Rubber & Plastics Co. v. FTC, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 384 , 258 F.2d 684 (D.C.Cir.1958); Austern, Five Thousand Dollars A Day, 21 A.B.A.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bauer-Smith Dredging Co., Inc.
v.
United States
No. 121.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1961.
368 U.S. 819
T. G. Schirmeyer for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, John G. Laughlin, Jr. and Kathryn H. Baldwin for the United States.
Published

Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.