green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
In Re Adoption No. 10087
(6×)
INTERSTATE COMPACT FOR THE PLACEMENT OF CHILDREN "An interstate compact is basically an agreement, between two or more states, entered into for the purpose of dealing with a problem that transcends state lines." P. Hardy, Interstate Compacts: The Ties That Bind 2 (1982); see Dutton v. Tawes, 225 Md. 484, 500 , 171 A.2d 688, 696 , cert. denied, 368 U.S. 345 , 82 S.Ct. 385 , 7 L.Ed.2d 342 (1961); Canal Co. v. Rail Road Co., 4 G. & J. 1, 128-29 (1832).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Colby Academy
See Crest Finance Co. v. United States, 368 U.S. 347 , 82 S.Ct. 384 , 7 L.Ed.2d 342 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
George W. Ultch Lumber Co. v. Hall Plastering, Inc.
See United States v. Crest Finance Co., 302 F.2d 568, 569 (7th Cir. 1962), on remand from 368 U.S. 347 , 82 S.Ct. 384 , 7 L.Ed.2d 342 (1961); cf. United States v. New Britain, 347 U.S. 81, 84 , 74 S.Ct. 367 , 98 L.Ed. 520 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robson v. United States
Ward v. United States, 344 U.S. 924 , 73 S.Ct. 494 , 97 L.Ed. 711 (1953), rev’g per curiam, 195 F.2d 441 (5th Cir. 1952); see Venus v. United States, 368 U.S. 345 , 82 S.Ct. 384 , 7 L.Ed.2d 341 (1961), rev’g per curiam, 287 F.2d 304 (9th Cir. 1961).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Francis Cashion
See Venus v. United States, 287 F.2d 304, 310-311 (CA9, 1960), rev’d on other grounds, 368 U.S. 345 , 82 S.Ct. 384 , 7 L.Ed.2d 341 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Texas Oil & Gas Corporation v. The United States of America, the Pecos County State Bank
See Crest Finance Co. v. United States, 1961, 368 U. S. 347 , 82 S.Ct. 384 , 7 L.Ed.2d 342 , and United States v. Vermont, 1964, 377 U.S. 351 , 84 S.Ct. 1267 , 12 L.Ed.2d 370 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. T. C. Trigg, and Cross-Appellants, First State Bank, Crosset, Arkansas
See United States v. Crest Finance Co., 302 F.2d 568, 569 (7th Cir. 1962), on remand from 368 U.S. 347 , 82 S.Ct. 384 , 7 L.Ed.2d 342 (1961); cf. United States v. New Britain, 347 U.S. 81, 84 , 74 S.Ct. 367 , 98 L.Ed. 520 (1954). [A]n unperfected security interest is subordinate to the rights of * * * a person who becomes a lien creditor without knowledge of the security interest and before it is perfected. [Ark.Stat.Ann. § 85-9-301(1) (b)] The 1966 amendments to the Federal Tax Lien Statute expanded the classes of claims which are entitled to priority over federal tax liens.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wahrer
See Venus v. United States, 287 F.2d 304, 307 (9th Cir. 1960), rev’d on other grounds, 368 U.S. 345 , 82 S.Ct. 384 , 7 L.Ed.2d 341 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Schroeder
(2×)
See Crest Finance Co. v. United States, 1961, 368 U.S. 347 , 82 S.Ct. 384 , 7 L.Ed.2d 342 , reversing 291 F.2d 1 , 7 Cir., 1961.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pickett v. Prince George's County
See, e.g., the discussion for the Court by Judge Hammond in Dutton v. Tawes, 225 Md. 484, 491-92 , 171 A.2d 688 , appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 368 U.S. 345 (1961).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Cary Chudy
See also Venus v. United Stated, 368 U.S. 345 , 82 S.Ct. 384 , 7 L.Ed.2d 341 (1961), reversing per curiam 287 F.2d 304 (9th Cir. 1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Waldo Simmons v. United States
Compare also Venus v. United States, 9 Cir., 1960, 287 F.2d 304 , reversed, 368 U.S. 345 , 82 S.Ct. 384 , 7 L.Ed.2d 341 (1961) (per curiam opinion citing Ward v. United States, 1953, 344 U.S. 924 , 73 S.Ct. 494 , 97 L.Ed. 711 ). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zuzich Truck Line, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
See, e. g., Morehouse v. United States, 194 F.Supp. 940 (D.Neb.1961), aff’d 368 U.S. 348 , 82 S.Ct. 385 , 7 L.Ed.2d 342 ; Dart Transit Co. — Investigation of Operations, 54 M.C.C. 429, sustained, Dart Transit Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 110 F.Supp. 876 (D.Minn.1953); Argo-Collier Trucklines Corp. Est. — Cleaning Compounds, 83 M.C.C. 433; Haugarth-Investigation and Revocation of Certificate, 83 M.C.C. 395; Safeway Truck Lines, Inc. — Investigation of Certificate, 74 M.C.C. 679; Chrispens Truck Lines, Inc. — Investigation of Operations, 63 M.C.C. 625.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DUTTON Et Al.
v.
TAWES, GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND
v.
TAWES, GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND
533.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 18, 1961.
Hyman A. Pressman for appellants., Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and Joseph S. Kaufman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.