green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.9 score
“federal courts possess the inherent power to enforce settlements entered into in settlement of litigation”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Adams Extract Co., Inc. v. Green Bay Packaging, Inc.
federal courts possess the inherent power to enforce settlements entered into in settlement of litigation
cited
Cited "see"
General Electric Capital Corp. v. Selph
See Lee v. Hunt, 410 F.Supp. 329, 333 (D.La.1976), aff'd, 631 F.2d 1171 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, Hunt v. Hunt, 454 U.S. 834 , 102 S.Ct. 133 , 70 L.Ed.2d 112 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duncan v. G.E.W., Inc.
See Lee v. Hunt, 631 F.2d 1171, 1175-1176 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 834 , 102 S.Ct. 133 , 70 L.Ed.2d 112 (1981) (court, following Restatement, applied law of Texas even though some of the property was located in Louisiana).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ibarra v. Texas Employment Commission
Skydell v. Ecological Science Corp., 425 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 1508 , 47 L.Ed.2d 762 (1976); accord Lee v. Hunt, 631 F.2d 1171, 1177 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 834 , 102 S.Ct. 983 , 71 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Palmer Barge Line, Inc. v. Southern Petroleum Trading Co., Ltd.
See Lee v. Hunt, 631 F.2d 1171, 1178 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 834 , 102 S.Ct. 133 , 70 L.Ed.2d 112 (1981) (applying Texas law); Tower Contracting Co., Inc. of Texas v. Burden Brothers, Inc., 482 S.W.2d 330, 335 (Tex.Civ.App.Dallas 1972, writ ref. n.r.e.); Sanders v. Republic National Bank of Dallas, 389 S.W.2d 551, 554 (Tex.Civ.App. - Tyler 1965, no writ). 4 The determination of whether a party’s will has been overcome is a question of fact which must be decided according to the totality of circumstances in a given case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gamewell Manufacturing, Inc., a Corporation v. Hvac Supply, Inc., and Aeronca, Inc.
(2×)
See Lee v. Hunt, 631 F.2d 1171, 1173-74 (5th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 834 , 102 S.Ct. 133 , 70 L.Ed.2d 112 (1981); Hageman v. Signal L.P.
discussed
Cited "see"
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. State of Arizona
See State of Tennessee v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 478 F.Supp. 199, 210 (M.D.Tenn.1979), aff’d, 652 F.2d 59 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 834 , 102 S.Ct. 135 , 70 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981) (federal court can declare state tax void and grant appropriate injunctive relief under 4-R Act).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
cadc 1982
See, e.g., Lee v. Hunt, 631 F.2d 1171, 1177-78 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 834 , 102 S.Ct. 133 , 70 L.Ed.2d 112 (1981); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 153 This argument is also inconsistent with the government's theory on appeal that settlement negotiations aborted or collapsed.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Village of Kaktovik v. Watt
See, e.g., Lee v. Hunt, 631 F.2d 1171, 1177-78 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 834 , 102 S.Ct. 133 , 70 L.Ed.2d 112 (1981); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 153.
Hunt
v.
Hunt
v.
Hunt
No. 80-2126.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.