green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.0 score
“overwhelming strength of government's case"; other evidence properly admitted "was exceptionally conclusive”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Alan Shackleford
overwhelming strength of government's case"; other evidence properly admitted "was exceptionally conclusive
discussed
Cited "see"
Greenan v. Greenan
See Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Tucker, 183 Conn. 85 , 91–92, 438 A.2d 828 (procedural due process requirements satis- fied when party opposing reasonableness of attorney’s fees is afforded opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine opposing parties’ witnesses on question of reasonableness), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S. Ct. 143 , 70 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Panganiban v. Panganiban
See Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Tucker, 183 Conn. 85, 91 , 438 A.2d 828 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S. Ct. 143 , 70 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Dobozy v. Dobozy
See Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Tucker, 183 Conn. 85, 91 , 438 A.2d 828 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S. Ct. 143 , 70 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis Allen Brewer
(2×)
See United States v. Reed, 647 F.2d 678, 686 (6th Cir.) (Rule 404(b) doesn’t justify elicitation of testimony that defendants are known burglars or fences in trial on charges of receiving stolen goods.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 1037, 102 S.Ct. 142 , 580, 70 L.Ed.2d 118 , 483 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Augustine Chikadili Okayfor (92-1706), and Tim Okosi (92-1812)
See United States v. Reed, 647 F.2d 678, 687 (6th Cir.) (evidence viola-tive of Rule 404(b) did not adversely affect the substantial rights of the defendants to a fair trial), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 142 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Hallenbeck v. St. Mark Evangelist Corp.
See Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Tucker, 183 Conn. 85, 90 , 438 A.2d 828 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S. Ct. 143 , 70 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Sks Die Casting & MacHining Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Sks Die Casting & MacHining Inc.
See Teamsters Local 115 v. NLRB, 640 F.2d 392 , 395 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 827 , 102 S.Ct. 119 , 70 L.Ed.2d 102 and 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 141 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Nowling v. Aero Services International, Inc.
See Alabama ex rel Graddick v. TVA, 636 F.2d 1061 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 142 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry Daniel Stull, Sr., Henry Daniel Stull, Jr., and Patricia Mooradian
See United States v. Reed, 647 F.2d 678, 689 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 142 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); United States v. Lutz, 621 F.2d 940, 945 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 859 , 101 S.Ct. 160 , 66 L.Ed.2d 75 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Home Loan Mortgage v. 69 Ward LLC, No. Cv-98-584831 (Jun. 2, 1999)
Proc., Pt. 9, 1975 Sess., pp. 4354-55; see also Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Tucker , 183 Conn. 85 , 94 n. 3, 438 A.2d 828 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S. Ct 143 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981). 1 While a foreclosure receivership may differ from the obligations of a landlord to make payments on a mortgage, the same reasoning that permits a utility receivership to have priority over mortgage payments should also allow it to have priority over a foreclosure receivership.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henrietta Faye Ell
See, e.g., Wood v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 637 F.2d 1188, 1194 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 142 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); Virgin Islands v. Edinborough, 625 F.2d 472, 474 (3d Cir.1980); United States v. Warren, 578 F.2d at 1076 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Clarence Samuel Robinson (80-5479), James Harold Coldiron (80-5480), Charles T. Cornett (80-5481)
See, e.g., United States v. Reed, 647 F.2d 678 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 142 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); United States v. Vinson, 606 F.2d 149 (6th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1074 , 100 S.Ct. 1020 , 62 L.Ed.2d 756 (1980); United States v. Enright, 579 F.2d 980 (6th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas Richard Warner, Michael Charles Ward
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Reed, 647 F.2d 678, 689 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 142 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); United States v. Bright, 630 F.2d 804, 813 (5th Cir. 1980). 31 Warner argues that he was prejudiced by the "spillover" effect of evidence against his three codefendants concerning transactions in which he was not involved.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Derrell Darnell Hamilton
See also United States v. Reed, 647 F.2d 678, 686 (6th Cir.), cert. denied 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 142 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); United States v. Weidman, 572 F.2d 1199 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 87 , 58 L.Ed.2d 113 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wood
v.
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
v.
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
No. 80-2192.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.