green
Positive treatment
8.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Public Service Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
See 8 F.E.R.C. ¶ 61,138, at 61,530 (1979). . 642 F.2d 1335 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 879 , 102 S.Ct. 360 , 70 L.Ed.2d 189 (1981) [hereinafter PSCNY]. . 15 U.S.C. § 717d(a). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Northern Natural Gas Company, Division of Internorth, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Michigan Power Company, Northern States Power Company, Process Gas Consumers Group, Energy Issues Intervention Office of the Minnesota Department of Public Service, Intervenors. Northern Natural Gas Company, Division of Internorth, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Panhandle, 613 F.2d at 1130 n. 51 (opinion of the court), 1148 (dissent). 41 The dissent in Panhandle also appears to have treated the two concepts interchangeably, referring both to "just and reasonable rates," a familiar phrase in rate regulation and one found in the Act itself, and to "a just and reasonable rate of return," an amalgam that is found nowhere in rate regulation or in the Act. 613 F.2d at 1148 42 Id., at 1148 (emphasis in original) 43 Indeed, as the Commission says, this would be "as a practical matter, impossible." See FERC Rehearing Brief at 15 n. 9, quoted at supra note …
discussed
Cited "see"
Office of the Consumers' Counsel, State of Ohio v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc., Columbia Gas Transmission Corp., Washington Gas Light Co., Intervenors. State of Ohio v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc., Columbia Gas Transmission Corp., Washington Gas Light Co., Intervenors
(2×)
See Public Service Commission v. FERC, 642 F.2d 1335 , 1342 (1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 879 , 102 S.Ct. 360 , 70 L.Ed.2d 189 (1981). 30 The consumers' final contention is that Columbia actively misled them concerning the duration of the service it would provide.
discussed
Cited "see"
Office of the Consumers' Counsel v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
See Public Service Commission v. FERC, 642 F.2d 1335 , 1342 (1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 879 , 102 S.Ct. 360 , 70 L.Ed.2d 189 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Indiana Gas Company, Inc., Central Illinois Light Company, Associated Natural Gas Company, Intervenors. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Associated Natural Gas Company, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company, Michigan Gas Storage Company, Indiana Gas Company, Inc., Intervenors
(2×)
See Public Service Comm'n v. FERC, 642 F.2d 1335 , 1345 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 879 , 880, 102 S.Ct. 360 , 362, 70 L.Ed.2d 189 (1981) 10 Specifically, Panhandle argues that Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 18 F.E.R.C. p 61,187 (Feb. 26, 1982), which required Panhandle to employ various new sub-accounts in its accounting method, caused 44 million dollars of deferred costs; and that Final Rules for Part 270, Subpart B, Sections 270.201, 270.202, and 270.204, 12 F.E.R.C. p 61,045 (July 16, 1980), and 15 F.E.R.C. p 61,075 (April 24, 1981), which mandated a change from the "wet" to t…
discussed
Cited "see"
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
See Public Service Comm’n v. FERC, 642 F.2d 1335 , 1345 (D.C.Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 879 , 880, 102 S.Ct. 360 , 362, 70 L.Ed.2d 189 (1981). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service Commission
(2×)
See Public Service Commission v. FERC, 206 U.S.App.D.C. 367, 377 , 642 F.2d 1335 , 1345 (1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 879 , 102 S.Ct. 360 , 70 L.Ed.2d 189 (1981) (holding that although a utility seeking a rate increase under the Natural Gas Act bore the burden of justifying the increase, it did not bear the burden of justifying “those portions of its filing that represent no departure from the status quo”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michaelis v. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n
Accord, In re Randall, 640 F.2d 898, 901 (8th Cir.) (certiorari to the United States Supreme Court is the sole means of reviewing disbarment by state supreme court), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 880 , 102 S.Ct. 361 , 70 L.Ed.2d 189 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ken L. Michaelis (Formally Known as Kenneth L. Michaelis) and Iona Rae Michaelis Rory Lee Michaelis, a Minor, by Ken L. Michaelis, His Father and Next Friend, and Kyle Lee Michaelis, a Minor, by Ken L. Michaelis, His Father and Next Friend v. The Nebraska State Bar Association, a Nebraska Association, and Homer Ed Hurt, Jr. James Egley Kenneth Olds Pliny M. Moodie Robert D. Moodie John M. Thor, Jr. Stanley P. Gushard William E. Webster, All Nebraska Lawyers and Members of the Nebraska State Bar Association Richard P. Garden, a Nebraska Lawyer and Member of the Nebraska State Bar Association Lucille Toelle Norris Maack Richard Lindberg Gwen Lindberg, D/B/A West Point News Theodore M. Huettmann and Gladys M. Huettmann, D/B/A Wisner News-Chronicle the Norfolk Daily News Fremont Tribune Lincoln Journal Newspaper Omaha World Herald Company, Owner-Publisher of Omaha World Herald Newspapers the Associated Press Wireservices and Paul Douglas, Ken L. Michaelis (Formally Known as Kenneth L. Michaelis) and Iona Rae Michaelis Rory Lee Michaelis, a Minor, by Ken L. Michaelis, His Father and Next Friend, Kyle Lee Michaelis, a Minor, by Ken L. Michaelis, His Father and Next Friend, and Kari Lynn Michaelis, a Minor, by Ken L. Michaelis, Her Father and Next Friend v. Norman M. Krivosha Leslie Boslaugh William C. Hastings Hale McCown Donald Brodkey Lawrence M. Clinton (Deceased) Edward Asche Dixon G. Adams Pliny M. Moodie Robert D. Moodie Homer Ed Hurt, Jr. Stanley P. Gushard Kenneth Olds James Egley John M. Thor, Jr. William E. Webster, All Being Members of the Nebraska State Bar Association the Nebraska State Bar Association, a Nebraska Association Consisting of All Licensed Nebraska Lawyers, All Nebraska Lawyers
Accord, In re Randall, 640 F.2d 898 , 901 (8th Cir.) (certiorari to the United States Supreme Court is the sole means of reviewing disbarment by state supreme court), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 880 , 102 S.Ct. 361 , 70 L.Ed.2d 189 (1981). 6 Consequently, the dismissals by the district court are affirmed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ohio Power Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
See Public Service Commission of New York v. FERC, 642 F.2d 1335, 1345 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 360 , 70 L.Ed.2d 189 (1981); Public Service Company of New Mexico v. FERC, 628 F.2d 1267, 1270-71 (10th Cir. 1980), cert. den. sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ohio Power Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
See Public Service Commission of New York v. FERC, 642 F.2d 1335, 1345 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 360 , 70 L.Ed.2d 189 (1981); Public Service Company of New Mexico v. FERC, 628 F.2d 1267, 1270-71 (10th Cir. 1980), cert. den. sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Petty
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-2089.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
Brennan, Certiorari, White.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Brennan, Justice White, and Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.