green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.0 score
“brutality in excess of that which is normally present in any killing" and "conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Nesbit
(2×)
Thus, employing the test espoused in Banks, 564 S.W.2d at 949 , we find no error in the admission of the photograph during the guilt phase of the trial. [3] See, e.g., State v. Scott, 626 S.W.2d 25, 28 (Tenn.Crim.App.1981); But see State v. Dicks, 615 S.W.2d 126, 128 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 431 , 70 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981) (pictures of homicide victim while alive should not be admitted at trial unless relevant to a material issue, although such an error may not be prejudicial to the outcome).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Rose
brutality in excess of that which is normally present in any killing" and "conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim
examined
Cited "see"
Ralph C. Feltrop v. Paul K. Delo
(4×)
See State v. Mercer, 618 S.W.2d 1 , 10 n. 5 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 432 , 70 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981). .
cited
Cited "see"
Rickman v. Dutton
See State v. Dicks, 615 S.W.2d 126, 131 (Tenn.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 431 , 70 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Shurn
(2×)
See State v. Mercer, 618 S.W.2d 1, 9 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 432 , 70 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Dixon
See State v. Martin, 303 N.C. 246, 254 , 278 S.E.2d 214, 220 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 933 , *1384 102 S.Ct. 431 , 70 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981) (requires “evidence that the murder in question involved brutality in excess of that which is normally present in any killing”); State v. Goodman, 298 N.C. 1, 24-25 , 257 S.E.2d 569, 585 (1979) (same).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Griffin
(4×)
See State v. Mercer, 618 S.W.2d 1, 7 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 432 , 70 L.Ed. 2d 240 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sidebottom
(2×)
See State v. Mercer, 618 S.W.2d 1,11 (Mo. banc 1981), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 432 , 70 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Schlup
(2×)
See State v. Mercer, 618 S.W.2d 1, 9 (Mo. banc 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 432 , 70 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gilmore
(2×)
See State v. Mercer, 618 S.W.2d 1, 7 (Mo. banc 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 432 , 70 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Noland
See State v. Martin, 303 N.C. 246 , 278 S.E.2d 214 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 431 , 70 L.Ed.2d 240 , reh. denied, 454 U.S. 1117 , 102 S.Ct. 693 , 70 L.Ed.2d 655 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Adkins
See, State v. Dicks, Tenn., 615 S.W.2d 126 (1981), cert, denied 454 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 431 , 70 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Teague
(2×)
See State v. Dicks, 615 S.W.2d 126 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 431 , 70 L.Ed.2d 240 ; Houston v. State, 593 S.W.2d 267 (Tenn. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 891 , 101 S.Ct. 251 , 66 L.Ed.2d 117 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Duncan
See also State v. Dicks, 615 S.W.2d 126 (1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 431 , 70 L.Ed.2d 240 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Oliver
State v. Goodman, 298 N.C. 1 , 257 S.E. 2d 569 (1979); see e.g., State v. Martin, 303 N.C. 246 , 278 S.E. 2d 214 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 431 , 70 L.Ed. 2d 240 (1981); State v. Oliver, 302 N.C. 28 , 274 S.E. 2d 183 (1981). 306 N.C. at 34-35 , 292 S.E. 2d at 227-28 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pinch
(2×)
State v. Goodman, 298 N.C. 1 , 257 S.E.2d 569 (1979); see, e.g., State v. Martin, 303 N.C. 246 , 278 S.E.2d 214 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 102 S.Ct. 431 , 70 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981); State v. Oliver, 302 N.C. 28 , 274 S.E.2d 183 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fierro
v.
MacDougall, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
v.
MacDougall, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
No. 81-5296.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1981.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.