green
Positive treatment
6.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Bush v. State
See Maggard v. State, 399 So.2d 973, 975 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 610 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981); D.F. v. State, 730 So.2d 384 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
cited
Cited "see"
D.F. v. State
See Maggard v. State, 399 So.2d 973, 975 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 610 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fredrick Garcia-Cruz
See United States v. Poland, 659 F.2d 884, 897 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 611 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Geralds v. State
See Maggard v. State, 399 So.2d 973, 977-78 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 610 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Campbell v. State
See Maggard v. State, 399 So.2d 973 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 610 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981); Riley v. State, 366 So.2d 19 (Fla. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward W. Seeley
See United States v. Barrett, 539 F.2d 244, 253 (1st Cir.1976) (Fed.R.Evid. 804(b)(3) “invests] the district court with a substantial degree of discretion in making this important finding on trustworthiness”); accord United States v. Poland, 659 F.2d 884, 895 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 611 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981); cf. United States v. Briscoe, 742 F.2d 842, 846-47 (5th Cir.1984) (applying a clearly erroneous standard to district court’s determination of trustworthiness).
cited
Cited "see"
Sands v. Cunningham
See Breest v. Perrin, 655 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 610 , 70 L.Ed.2d 597 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. State
See Maggard v. State, 399 So.2d 973, 976 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 610 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
James v. State
See Maggard v. State, 399 So.2d 973 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 610 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981); A. McD. v. State, 422 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Ho Yin Wong v. State, 359 So.2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 364 So.2d 886 (Fla.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald M. Schaflander, United States of America v. Stephen M. Wright
See Bennett, supra, citing United States v. Poland, 659 F.2d 884, 894 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 611 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Herzog v. State
See Maggard v. State, 399 So.2d 973, 976 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 610 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981); Ray v. State, 403 So.2d 956, 960 (Fla. 1981); Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701, 703 (Fla. 1978); Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331, 333-34 (Fla. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Herzog v. State
See Maggard v. State, 399 So.2d 973, 976 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 610 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981); Ray v. State, 403 So.2d 956, 960 (Fla.1981); Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701, 703 (Fla.1978); Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331, 333-34 (Fla.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Laurence John Layton
See United States v. Poland, 659 F.2d 884 (9th Cir.1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 611 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981) (Poland); United States v. Hoyos, 573 F.2d 1111 (9th Cir.1978) (Hoyos); Satterfield; United States v. Benveniste, 564 F.2d 335 (9th Cir.1977) (Benveniste); United States v. Oropeza, 564 F.2d 316 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1080 , 98 S.Ct. 1276 , 55 L.Ed.2d 788 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Foster
See Brown v. U.S., 656 F.2d 361 (8th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 611 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981); United States v. Sturm, 671 F.2d 749, 751 (3d Cir.1982), cert. *1409 denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 95 , 74 L.Ed.2d 86 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Middleton v. State
See Maggard v. State, 399 So.2d 973 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 610 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Deluca, Robert Kaye, James Danno, and John Lee
See United States v. Poland, 659 F.2d 884, 892-94 (9th Cir.) (judicial misconduct claim rejected despite judge’s “impatience and irritation” directed toward counsel and toward defendants during their testimony), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 611 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1982
See United States v. Poland, 659 F.2d 884, 894 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 611 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981); United States v. Price, 623 F.2d 587, 593 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1016 , 101 S.Ct. 577 , 66 L.Ed.2d 475 (1980) 14 Singer also alleges that the government violated a Florida speedy-trial rule, Fla.Ct.Cr.P.R. 3.191, because he was not tried within 180 days of his state arrest, and the Federal Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq., and the sixth amendment because he was not indicted within thirty days of being arrested by state authorities.
cited
Cited "see"
Simmons v. State
See Maggard v. State, 399 So.2d 973 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 610 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Singer
See United States v. Poland, 659 F.2d 884, 894 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 611 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981); United States v. Price, 623 F.2d 587, 593 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1016 , 101 S.Ct. 577 , 66 L.Ed.2d 475 (1980). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salerno
Compare United States v. Poland, 659 F.2d 884, 896 (9th Cir.) (per curiam ), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 611 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salerno
Compare United States v. Poland, 659 F.2d 884, 896 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 611 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sanchez-Lopez
Such comments are only expressions of the judge’s opinion of the facts and the jury may disregard them entirely since the jurors are the sole judges of the facts.” See Quercia v. United States, 289 U.S. 466, 469 , 53 S.Ct. 698, 699 , 77 L.Ed. 1321 (1933) (a judge may comment upon the evidence and may express an opinion on the facts as long: as the judge makes it clear to the jury that all matters of fact are submitted for their determination); see also United States v. Poland, 659 F.2d 884, 894 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 611 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1989
Such comments are only expressions of the judge's opinion of the facts and the jury may disregard them entirely since the jurors are the sole judges of the facts." See Quercia v. United States, 289 U.S. 466, 469 , 53 S.Ct. 698, 699 , 77 L.Ed. 1321 (1933) (a judge may comment upon the evidence and may express an opinion on the facts as long as the judge makes it clear to the jury that all matters of fact are submitted for their determination); see also United States v. Poland, 659 F.2d 884, 894 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 611 , 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brooks v. Solomon Co.
See also, Breest v. Perrin, 495 F.Supp. 287 (D.N.H.1980), aff’d, 655 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059 , 102 S.Ct. 610 , 70 L.Ed.2d 597 (1981); and Honaker v. Fla. Power & Light Co., supra. Although Mendicki does not specifically discuss the question of federal question or jurisdiction, the court does say: The declared policy of the national legislation on labor relations is to encourage, facilitate and effectuate the settlement of issues between employers and employees through the “processes of conference and collective bargaining between employers and representatives of…
Valdes
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 81-5495.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 16, 1981.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir: Certiorari denied.