green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1993 ·
…though each case by itself is less than compelling, their conclusion has been unanimous: the fourth amendment forbids the unannounced, forcible entry of a dwelling in the absence of exigent circumstances.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Sylvia Sagaribay and Javier Armando Rueda
though each case by itself is less than compelling, their conclusion has been unanimous: the fourth amendment forbids the unannounced, forcible entry of a dwelling in the absence of exigent circumstances.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SYLVIA SAGARIBAY and JAVIER ARMANDO RUEDA
though each case by itself is less than compelling, their conclusion has been unanimous: the fourth amendment forbids the unannounced, forcible entry of a dwelling in the absence of exigent circumstances.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hanabusa v. Lingle
Accord Riegle v. Federal Open Market Committee, 656 F.2d 873, 878 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 636 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981) (“We think it may argued plausibly that Senator Riegle has met the [burden of establishing injury-in-fact for purposes of standing] .... [Assuming that the five Reserve Bank members of the [Federal Open Market Committee] are officers who must be appointed with the advice and consent of the Senate, Riegle’s inability to exercise his right under the Appointments Clause of the [federal] Constitution [because Reserve Bank members are selected by a Bo…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Latham
See Hopi Tribe v. Navajo Tribe, 46 F.3d 908, 918 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 931 , 116 S.Ct. 337 , 133 L.Ed.2d 236 (1995); accord United States v. Francis, 646 F.2d 251, 262 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Specialty Bakeries, Inc. v. RobHal, Inc.
Nov.25, 1996) (Yohn, J.); accord United States v. District of Columbia, 654 F.2d 802 , 809 n. 16 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dwayne Keith FITZEN, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Francis, 646 F.2d 251, 263 (6th Cir.) (“It makes no difference that in this case it is a state rather than the IRS which has asserted an interest in the seized cash.”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Cae-Link Corp.
See generally United States v. District of Columbia, 654 F.2d 802 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Prince George’s County v. United States, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Bliley v. Kelly
See Riegle v. Federal Open Market Committee, 656 F.2d 873, 877-79 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 636 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilfried Van Cauwenberghe
See United States v. Francis, 646 F.2d 251, 263 (6th Cir.) (denying return of illegally seized property where state tax lien had been placed on the property), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981); United States v. Freedman, 444 F.2d 1387, 1388 (9th Cir.1971) (denying return of illegally seized property because of pending IRS lien); Guerra v. United States, 645 F.Supp. 775, 779-80 (C.D.Cal.1986) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guerra v. United States
See United States v. Francis, 646 F.2d 251, 262-64 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981); United States v. Freedman, 444 F.2d 1387, 1388 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 992 , 92 S.Ct. 538 , 30 L.Ed.2d 544 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Dennis v. Luis
See Riegle v. Federal Open Market Committee, 656 F.2d 873, 878-79 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 636 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dennis v. Luis
(2×)
See Riegle v. Federal Open Market Committee, 656 F.2d 873, 878-79 (D.C.Cir.), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 636 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. U.S. House of Representatives
(2×)
See Riegle v. Federal Open Market Committee, 656 F.2d 873 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 636 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981); Metcalf v. National Petroleum Council, 553 F.2d 176, 187 (D.C.Cir. 1977). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alvarez v. Chavez
See Deibler v. City of Rehoboth Beach, 790 F.2d 328, 333-37 (3d Cir.1986) (utilizing a higher level of scrutiny in an election case than traditional rational-basis review, but expressly stating that the test is the rational-basis test); Bolin v. State Dep’t of Public Safety, 313 N.W.2d 381, 382-84 (Minn.1981) (right to run for office is an important right and statute restricting the right is scrutinized for more than rational basis); see also Stone v. City of Wichita Falls, 477 F.Supp. 581, 584 (N.D.Tex.1979) (right to run for county commission an important but not fundamental right), aff'd,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert H. Michel v. Donnald K. Anderson
See, e.g., Riegle v. Federal Open Market Comm., 656 F.2d 873, 881 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 636 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981); Vander Jagt v. O’Neill, 699 F.2d 1166, 1176-77 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 823 , 104 S.Ct. 91 , 78 L.Ed.2d 98 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Van Cauwenberghe
See also United States v. Francis, 646 F.2d 251, 263 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981); Welsh v. United States, 220 F.2d 200, 201-02 (D.C.Cir.1955). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wilfried Van Cauwenberghe, Williams & Connolly, Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant. Roger Biard v. Alan H. Blair, and Wilfried Van Cauwenberghe, and Williams & Connolly
See also United States v. Francis, 646 F.2d 251, 263 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981); Welsh v. United States, 220 F.2d 200, 201-02 (D.C.Cir.1955) 13 Fed.R.Civ.P. 64 provides that At the commencement of and during the course of an action, all remedies providing for seizure of person or property for the purpose of securing satisfaction of the judgment ultimately to be entered in the action are available under the circumstances and in the manner provided by the law of the state in which the district court is held, existing at the time the remedy is …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
White v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.
The Second Circuit has held that cases interpreting the “necessary in aid of jurisdiction” exception in the Anti-Injunction Act are “helpful in understanding the meaning of the All-Writs Act.” See In re Baldwin-United Corp., 770 F.2d 328, 335 (2d Cir.1985); see also United States v. District of Columbia, 654 F.2d 802 , 809 n. 16 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981) (same); Bruce v. Martin, 680 F.Supp. 616, 621 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos Litigation)
The Second Circuit has held that cases interpreting the “necessary in aid of jurisdiction” exception in the Anti-Injunction Act are “helpful in understanding the meaning of the All-Writs Act.” See In re Baldwin-United Corp., 770 F.2d 328, 335 (2d Cir.1985); see also United States v. District of Columbia, 654 F.2d 802 , 809 n. 16 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981) (same); Bruce v. Martin, 680 F.Supp. 616, 621 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ford
(2×)
See e.g., United States v. Francis, 646 F.2d 251, 257-58 (6th Cir.), cert. den. 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981) (Fourth Amendment forbids unannounced entry of a dwelling absent exigent circumstances); Commonwealth v. Morgan, 517 Pa. 93 , 534 A.2d 1054 (1987) (violation of rule merely a factor to be considered in assessing claim of constitutional violation on grounds of unreasonable search); State v. Vrtiska, 225 Neb. 454 , 406 N.W.2d 114 , cert. den. 484 U.S. 863 , 108 S.Ct. 180 , 98 L.Ed.2d 133 (1987) (unannounced entry to execute search warrant did not violate Fourth Am…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mid-Ohio Food Bank v. Lyng
See also Riegle v. Federal Open Market Committee, 656 F.2d 873, 881 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 636 , 70 L.Ed. 2d 616 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morton H. Halperin v. Henry A. Kissinger
See, e.g., Riegle v. Federal Open Market Committee, 656 F.2d 873 , 879 & n. 7 (D.C.Cir.) (finding congressional standing by attempting to distinguish Reuss v. Balles, 584 F.2d 461, 465-68 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 997 , 99 S.Ct. 598 , 58 L.Ed.2d 670 (1978), which found none in identical circumstances), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 636 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981); Harrington v. Bush, 553 F.2d 190, 207-09 (D.C.Cir. 1977) (abandoning holding of Mitchell v. Laird, 488 F.2d 611, 614 (D.C.Cir.1973), that allowed for congressional standing whenever alleged illegality "bears upon" Cong…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Baldwin-United Corp.
See, e.g., United States v. District of Columbia, 654 F.2d 802 , 809 n. 16 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981); see also 1A J.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Baldwin-United Corporation (Single Premium Deferred Annuities Insurance Litigation) Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin, Maine Attorney General James E. Tierney, Intervenor-Appellant
See, e.g., United States v. District of Columbia, 654 F.2d 802 , 809 n. 16 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981); see also 1A J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Juanes
v.
Southwestern Public Service Co. and New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Juanes
v.
Southwestern Public Service Co. and New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Juanes
No. 81-400; No. 81-609.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 30, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1) · D. Connecticut (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 645 F. 2d 67.