green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Naegele
The government is right, of course, that “[a]n indictment returned by a legally constituted and unbiased grand jury, ... if valid on its face, is enough to call for trial of the charge on the merits.” Costello v. United *14 States, 350 U.S. 359, 363 , 76 S.Ct. 406 , 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956); see United States v. Conlon, 628 F.2d 150, 155-56 (D.C.Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1149 , 102 S.Ct. 1015 , 71 L.Ed.2d 304 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Safavian
“An indictment returned by a legally constituted and unbiased grand jury, ... if valid on its face, is enough to call for trial of the charge on the merits.” Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 363 , 76 S.Ct. 406 , 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956); see United States v. Conlon, 628 F.2d 150, 155-56 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1149 , 102 S.Ct. 1015 , 71 L.Ed.2d 304 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael K. Hebeka
See United States v. Blecker, 657 F.2d 629, 633-34 (4th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1016 , 71 L.Ed.2d 304 (1982); United States v. Catena, 500 F.2d 1319, 1322-23 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1047 , 95 S.Ct. 621 , 42 L.Ed.2d 641 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Liotard, Russell
Levine, 658 F.2d at 126 (emphasis added); accord, United States v. Litman, 661 F.2d 17 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1016 , 71 L.Ed.2d 304 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. United States
See United States v. Siemens America, Inc., 68 CCPA 62, 653 F.2d 471 (1981), cert. denied 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1016 , 71 L.Ed.2d 304 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Matter Impounded
See United States v. Litman, 661 F.2d 17, 19 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1016 , 71 L.Ed.2d 304 (1982), in which we characterized Johanson as “suggesting [that the] denial of [a] pretrial evidentiary hearing on prosecutorial misconduct is nonappealable because post-conviction relief may remedy [a] putative denial of right to [an] impartial grand jury, but holding that the pretrial order did not conclusively determine the issue.” Johanson is but one example of what in Akerly v. Red Barn Systems, Inc., 551 F.2d 539, 543 (3d Cir.1977), we referred to as this Circuit�…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Valentine Rosi, AKA Michael Valentine Edwards, AKA Michael Valentine, AKA Michael Edwards, AKA Michael Valentine Rose
In the end, the “test is not whether the indictment could have been framed in a more satisfactory manner but whether it conforms to minimal constitutional standards.” United States v. Haas, 583 F.2d 216, 219 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 1788 , 60 L.Ed.2d 240 (1979); see also United States v. Conlon, 628 F.2d 150, 156 (D.C.Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1149 , 102 S.Ct. 1015 , 71 L.Ed.2d 304 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Greco v. State
See also United States v. Blecker, 657 F.2d 629, 632 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1016 , 71 L.Ed.2d 304 (1982); United States v. Reed, 773 F.2d 477, 482 (2d Cir.1985) (“Established caselaw thus allows prosecutions under many federal statutes to be *476 brought in any district where the effects of the crime are felt”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Wuagneux
See, e.g., United States v. Blecker, 657 F.2d 629, 632 (4th Cir. 1981) ( 18 U.S.C. § 287 ), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1016 , 71 L.Ed.2d 304 (1982); United States v. Herberman, 583 F.2d 222, 226-27 (5th Cir. 1978) ( 18 U.S.C. § 1001 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hatch
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-980.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1982.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.