green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Berkley v. Common Council of Charleston
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See, e.g., Goldberg v. Town of Rocky Hill, 973 F.2d 70, 72, 74 (2d Cir.1992) (rejecting “out of hand” the claim that a municipality “is entitled to absolute immunity for its legislative acts,” and “hold[ing] that there is no immunity defense, either qualified or absolute, available to a municipality sought to be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983”); Aitchison v. Raffiani, 708 F.2d 96, 100 (3d Cir.1983) (citing Reed v. Village of Shorewood, 704 F.2d 943, 953 (7th Cir.1983)) (“[Liability against the municipality is not precluded simply because the [local legislators] were found im…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Orville Milk
See United States v. Collins, 652 F.2d 735, 742 (8th Cir.1981) (holding that the district court did not err in refusing to give a lesser included instruction for simple possession when the defendant was convicted of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute and possession with the intent to distribute), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gutierrez-Santiman
See United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 258-59 (2d Cir.1981) (affidavit sufficient that disclosed use of standard investigative techniques and paucity of evidence which had resulted or could be expected to result), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 886-87 (9th Cir.) (“An investigative agency is not required to exhaust all possible investigative techniques before resorting to a wiretap.”), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Brigante v. United States
See Grieg v. United States, 640 F.2d 1261 , 226 Ct.Cl. 258, 265-66 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Miller v. United States
See Grieg v. United States, 226 Ct.Cl. 258 , 640 F.2d 1261 (1981), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 285 , 594 F.2d 804 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bennett
See United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 259 (2nd Cir.1981) (district court’s finding of fact that a date on the order authorizing the wiretap was a ministerial error and therefore insignificant was not a clearly erroneous finding), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 907, 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 1251, 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); United States v. Acon, 513 F.2d 513, 518 (3rd Cir.1975) (“Suppression is not required for facial insufficiency relating to less critical requirements which may be varied by subsequent affidavits.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leslie Gordon Harris
See United States v. Collins, 652 F.2d 735, 740 (8th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alexander
United States v. White, 750 F.2d 726, 728-29 (8th Cir.1984); see United States v. Collins, 652 F.2d 735, 738 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Wheeler v. City of Pleasant Grove
See Hernandez v. City of Lafayette, 643 F.2d 1188 , 1200 n. 26 (5th Cir. Unit A May 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Wheeler v. City Of Pleasant Grove
See Hernandez v. City of Lafayette, 643 F.2d 1188 , 1200 n. 26 (5th Cir. Unit A May 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ruscingno
See U.S. v. Collins, 652 F. 2d 735, 740 (8th Cir.1981), cert. den. 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed. 2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fescina v. United States
Furthermore, they had a legal obligation in this duty, as no other officer had for this period, to ensure “the complete and accurate use of the report and the regulations governing its preparation.” AR 623-105 114-1; see Grieg v. United States, 226 Ct.Cl. 258, 268-69 , 640 F.2d 1261, 1267 (1981), cert. den., 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William C. Page
See United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 258-59 (2d Cir.1981) (affidavit sufficient that disclosed use of standard investigative techniques and paucity of evidence which had resulted or could be expected to result), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 886-87 (9th Cir.) (“An investigative agency is not required to exhaust all possible investigative techniques before resorting to a wiretap.”), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Fox
See United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 260 (2d Cir. 1981) (discretion to grant or deny continuance), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); see also United States v. Correia, 531 F.2d 1095, 1098 (1st Cir.1976) (noting that Act puts “significant pressure” on district court to exercise discretion to control its own docket); cf. 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(8)(A) to (C) (“ends of justice” continuance).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul O'Malley
See United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 259 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 1251, 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); United States v. Bailey, 607 F.2d 237, 241 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 934 , 100 S.Ct. 1327 , 63 L.Ed.2d 769 (1980); United States v. Santora, 600 F.2d 1317, 1319-20 (9th Cir. 1979); United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050, 1054 (5th Cir.1976); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph C. Gallo Frederick Graewe Hartmut Graewe, Kevin Joseph McTaggart Angelo A. Lonardo
See United States v. Todisio, 667 F.2d 255, 260 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982), and United States v. Horton, 676 F.2d 1165, 1170 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1184 , 75 L.Ed.2d 431 (1983); see also Committee on the Administration of the Criminal Law of the Judicial Conference of the United States, Guidelines to the Administration of the Speedy Trial Act oif 1979 (1981) at 14 (30-day period does not run anew when a superseding indictment is filed).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mozur v. Orr
See Grieg v. United, States [ 226 Ct.Cl. 258 ], 640 F.2d 1261 (Ct.Cl.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); Sanders v. United States [ 219 Ct.Cl. 285 ], 594 F.2d 804 (Ct.Cl.1979).” Id. at 2367.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See Hernandez v. City of LaFayette, 643 F.2d 1188, 1192-94 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); Gorman Towers, Inc. v. Bogoslavsky, 626 F.2d 607, 611-15 (8th Cir.1980); see also Reed v. Village of Shorewood, 704 F.2d 943, 952-53 (7th Cir.1983); Espanola Way Corp. v. Meyerson, 690 F.2d 827, 829-30 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 1431 , 75 L.Ed.2d 791 (1983); Kuzinich v. County of Santa Clara, 689 F.2d 1345, 1349-50 (9th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Abraham v. Pekarski
See Hernandez v. City of LaFayette, 643 F.2d 1188, 1192-94 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); Gorman Towers, Inc. v. Bogoslavsky, 626 F.2d 607, 611-15 (8th Cir.1980); see also Reed v. Village of Shorewood, 704 F.2d 943, 952-53 (7th Cir.1983); Espanola Way Corp. v. Meyerson, 690 F.2d 827, 829-30 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied,— U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 1431 , 75 L.Ed.2d 791 (1983); Kuzinich v. County of Santa Clara, 689 F.2d 1345, 1349-50 (9th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Benjamin Ruggiero, Nicholas Santora, Anthony Rabito, and Antonio Tomasulo
Viewing the affidavits submitted in support of the wiretap applications in a " 'common sense and realistic fashion' ", United States v. Ivic, 700 F.2d 51, 57 (2d Cir.1983); see United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1130 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976), and with the deference properly accorded to the issuing judge, United States v. Perry, 643 F.2d 38, 50 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 835 , 102 S.Ct. 138 , 70 L.Ed.2d 115 (1981); see United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 258 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 7…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Shakur
See United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 258 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Western Life Insurance Company v. Commodore Cove Improvement District
Agins v. City of Tiburon, 447 U.S. 255, 260 , 100 S.Ct. 2138, 2141 , 65 L.Ed.2d 106, 111 (1980); see Hernandez v. City of Lafayette, 643 F.2d 1188, 1197 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982). 18 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Haselrig v. United States
When a plaintiff challenges an adverse military personnel decision,, the applicable standard of review is whether the adverse decision “was arbitrary, or capricious, or in bad faith, or unsupported by substantial evidence, or contrary to law, regulation or mandatory published procedure of a substantive nature, by which a plaintiff has been seriously prejudiced, and money is due.” Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. at 298 , 594 F.2d at 811 ; see also Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 303 , 103 S.Ct. 2362 , 76 L.Ed.2d 586 (1983) (citing Grieg v. United States, 226 Ct.Cl. 258 , 640 F.2d 12…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scarseth v. United States
See Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 285, 298 , 594 F.2d 804, 811 (1979); see also Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 303 , 103 S.Ct. 2362 , 76 L.Ed.2d 586 (1983) (citing Grieg v. United States, 226 Ct.Cl. 258 , 640 F.2d 1261 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982) and Sanders); Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1312 (Fed.Cir.1998), reh’g denied and en banc suggestion declined (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999); Doe v. United States, 132 F.3d 1430, 1434 (Fed.Cir.1997); Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1571-72…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arthur Lee Burns, Jr.
In addition, we have held that where the accused initially waives his or her right to remain silent and agrees to questioning, but “subsequently refuses to answer further questions, the prosecution may note the refusal because it now constitutes part of an otherwise admissible conversation between the police and the accused.” United States v. Harris, 956 F.2d 177, 181 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 827 , 113 S.Ct. 85 , 121 L.Ed.2d 48 (1992); see also United States v. Collins, 652 F.2d 735, 739 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berkley v. Common Council of City of Charleston
The Court in Tenney granted the individual legislators absolute immunity from suit because these actions were within "the sphere of legitimate legislative activity." Id. at 376, 71 S.Ct. at 788; see also Hernandez v. City of Lafayette, 643 F.2d 1188, 1196 (5th Cir. Unit A May 1981) ("[T]he constitutional violation about which the plaintiff in Owen could legally complain was caused by the members of the city council while performing a legitimate legislative function."), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pine Ridge Recycling, Inc. v. Butts County, Ga.
See also Hernandez v. City of Lafayette, 643 F.2d 1188 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Millan
Dongilli Aff. ¶¶ 40-48; see also United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 258 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied sub nom., Vallone v. United States, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982) (pen register and other contacts "subject to an innocent interpretation when viewed in isolation" support probable cause finding when set in context).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mellan
Dongilli Aff. ¶¶ 40-48; see also United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 258 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied sub nom., Vallone v. United States, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982) (pen register and other contacts “subject to an innocent interpretation when viewed in isolation” support probable cause finding when set in context).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jay Brummett v. Jimmy Camble, Jim Boles, Doug Sanders, Dan Boulware, John R. MacLean First State Bank of Cleburne, Texas, and Johnson County, Texas
Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622, 638 , 100 S.Ct. 1398, 1409 , 63 L.Ed.2d 673 (1980); see also Hernandez v. City of Lafayette, 643 F.2d 1188, 1196 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982) (city potentially liable for § 1983 violation committed by mayor with absolute legislative immunity).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vacca v. Barletta
See, e.g., Hernandez v. City of Lafayette, 643 F.2d 1188, 1192-93 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); Reed v. Village of Shorewood, 704 F.2d 943, 952-53 (7th Cir.1983); Kuzinich v. County of Santa Clara, 689 F.2d 1345, 1349-50 (9th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baytree of Inverrary Realty Partners v. The City of Lauderhill
See, e.g., Hernandez v. City of Lafayette, 643 F.2d 1188, 1193-94 (5th Cir.1981) (mayor’s veto of zoning ordinance passed by city’s legislative body), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); Bruce v. Riddle, 631 F.2d 272, 280 (4th Cir.1980) (local council members held to have acted within scope of legislative activities when they voted on zoning ordinance); South Gwinnett Venture v. Pruitt, 491 F.2d 5, 7 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (local zoning is quasi-legislative procedure, not subject to federal juridical consideration absent arbitrary action), cert. denied, 419 U…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kirkland
See also, United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 259 (2nd Cir.1981) (district court’s finding of fact that a date on the order authorizing the wiretap was a ministerial error and therefore insignificant was not a clearly erroneous finding), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 1251, 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reade v. United States
See, e.g., Grieg, v. United States, 640 F.2d 1261, 1268-69 , 226 Ct.Cl. 258 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); Skinner v. United States, 594 F.2d 824, 830, 219 Ct.Cl. 322 (1979); Sanders v. United States, 594 F.2d 804, 813, 219 Ct.Cl. 285 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Feola
See, e.g., United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 258 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982) (pen register and other contacts “subject to an innocent interpretation when viewed in isolation” supported probable cause finding when set in context).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Word v. United States
See also United States v. Todisco, 667 F.2d 255, 260 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moore v. United States
See, e.g., Grieg v. United States, 226 Ct.Cl. 258, 269-71 , 640 F.2d 1261, 1268-69 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 322, 332-33 , 594 F.2d 824, 830 (1979); Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 285, 301-02 , 594 F.2d 804, 813 (1979); Boyd v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 1, 8-9 (1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1106 , 47 L.Ed.2d 314 (1976); Stephens v. United States, 174 Ct.Cl. 365, 371-72 , 358 F.2d 951, 955 (1966); Brownfield v. United States, 148 Ct.Cl. 411, 419 (1960).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kenneth Fitzgerald v. United States
See also United States v. Collins, 652 F.2d 735 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz
See also Hernandez v. City of Lafayette, 643 F.2d 1188 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982) (an action for monetary damages will lie under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 where land is taken through harsh zoning). 3 The plaintiffs’ second claim seeks such compensation.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cryan, dba Denturist-Denture Lab
v.
Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists of Oklahoma
v.
Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists of Oklahoma
No. 81-630.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1982.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Okla. Certiorari denied.