green
Positive treatment
8.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Munden v. State
Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79, 139 (1981), cert, denied 455 U.S. 922 ,102 SiCt. 1280, 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Harlow v. State
See Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79 (1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); Jones v. State, Wyo., 580 P.2d 1150 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Hodgins v. State
See Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79, 166 (Wyo.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Canady
See Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79, 130 (Wyo.1981) (“[a] party may not merely have hearsay admitted under [the state of mind exception] in order to circumvent the [hearsay] rule”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Engberg v. Meyer
(2×)
See Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79 (Wyo. 1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of Wyoming
(2×)
See Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79 (Wyo.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982) (Hopkinson I).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of Wyoming
(2×)
See Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79, 97 (Wyo.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982) (Hopkinson I).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Finley
See United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 1025 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gabriel Alvarez, Gustavo Holguin, Leovigilda Rivera, Humberto Olivares Castrellon and Oneyda Zambrana
(2×)
Faurote, 749 F.2d at 43 ; see United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 322 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Blakey, 607 F.2d 779, 787 (7th Cir.1979). a. true and accurate recordings The government presented clear and convincing evidence to show that the conversations were recorded truly and accurately.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Finley
See United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cutbirth v. State
(2×)
See Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79 (1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); Jones v. State, Wyo., 580 P.2d 1150 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Haselhuhn v. State
(2×)
See Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cesar Tenorio-Angel
See United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 321 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Bower, 575 F.2d 499, 503 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 983 , 99 S.Ct. 572 , 58 L.Ed.2d 654 (1978). 10 As recently stated by the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Aguirre Aguirre, 716 F.2d 293 (5th Cir.1983): Although the confidential informant's privilege no longer exists when the informant is known to the defendant “[t]he need for the informant’s safety, the avoidance of jeopardizing other opera *1511 tions, or the defendant’s …
discussed
Cited "see"
All American Life & Casualty Co. v. Oceanic Trade Alliance Council International, Inc.
See United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786, 788 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Martinez, 604 F.2d 361, 366 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 708 , 62 L.Ed.2d 671 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
All American Life And Casualty Company v. Oceanic Trade Alliance Council International
See United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786, 788 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Martinez, 604 F.2d 361, 366 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 708 , 62 L.Ed.2d 671 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Hopkinson v. District Court, Teton County
See Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79 (1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982) [Hopkinson I]; Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 664 P.2d 43 , cert. denied — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 262 , 78 L.Ed.2d 246 (1983) [Hopkinson II]; Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 679 P.2d 1008 , cert. denied — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 228 , 83 L.Ed.2d 157 (1984) [Hopkinson III], Briefly, the facts are that appellant was found guilty of four murders and, as a result of the presence of statutory aggravating circumstances and upon recommendation of a jury, sentenced to death for the murder of Jeff Green.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Lewis Clark, Iii, and George R. Newton, Moody Nichols, Defendants
United States v. Williams, 503 F.2d 50, 53 (6th Cir.1974); see United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Mullins, 638 F.2d 1151, 1152 (8th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rex C. Cauble, Individually and Doing Business as Cauble Enterprises
See United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(2). 30 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Joe Whitten, John Elmer Gaiefsky, Jack Wayne Gish, Richard Lawrence Shimel
See United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786, 787-89 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982) (evidence of a large number of calls between a narcotics buyer and defendant who was identified as the seller sufficient to establish a violation of § 843(b)); United States v. Cooper, 606 F.2d 96, 98 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1024 , 100 S.Ct. 685 , 62 L.Ed.2d 657 (1980) (testimony that witness sent several money orders and that some of the money used for heroin sufficient to support a conviction on two counts of § 843(b)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David L. Mack
See United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786, 789 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmy Dale Wood
See, United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 322 (5th Cir.1981), cert. den., 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clark N. Fischel
See United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 321 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kingkamau Nantambu
The panel cited the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, stating that “ ‘[t]he fact that [the operator] successfully made the tape recordings [ ] satisfies the competency requirement.’ ” Id. at 511 , 644 A.2d 672 (second alteration in original) (quoting United States v. Franklin, 747 F.2d 497, 498 (8th Cir.1984)); see also United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317 (5th Cir.1981) (holding because “the paramount purpose of the inquiry is to insure the accuracy of the recording^] ... the government’s failure to show the competency of either the operator or the machine was overshadowed…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saunders v. State
See also Palmer v. State, *80 401 So.2d 266, 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).” Jones v. State, [Ms. CR-05-0527, Aug. 31, 2007] — So.3d -, - (Ala.Crim.App.2007), quoting Hubbard v. State, 500 So.2d 1204, 1218 (Ala.Crim.App.), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1231 (Ala.1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. State
See also Palmer v. State, 401 So.2d 266, 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brownfield v. State
See also Palmer v. State, 401 So.2d 266, 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barber v. State
See also Palmer v. State, 401 So.2d 266, 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hocker v. State
See also Palmer v. State , 401 So.2d 266 , 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bridges v. State
See also Palmer v. State , 401 So.2d 266 , 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied , 401 So.2d 270 (Ala. 1981), cert. denied , 455 U.S. 922 [ 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 ] (1982).' " Free v. State , 495 So.2d 1147 , 1156 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), quoting Moore v. State , 488 So.2d 27 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Free v. State
See also Palmer v. State , 401 So.2d 266 , 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 [ 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 ] (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hubbard v. State
See also Palmer v. State , 401 So.2d 266 , 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Moore v. State
See also Palmer v. State , 401 So.2d 266 , 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patterson v. State
(2×)
See also Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79, 111 (1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982), where we said: "* * * The purpose of voir dire is to inquire of the jurors as to their prejudices and biases which would interfere with their ability to decide the case fairly." In order to attain the purpose which we identified in Lopez v. State, supra, Hopkinson v. State, supra, and the other opinions cited above, it is necessary that a litigant, his attorney and the court be allowed to develop such facts and disclose such legal principles as are necessary to permit…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rhea Lucky Nichols and Michael Ford, A/K/A L.D. Haufer
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786, 788 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Martinez, 604 F.2d 361, 366 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 708 , 62 L.Ed.2d 671 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lerma
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-1147.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1982.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.