green
Positive treatment
9.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 46 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Royal
(2×)
But see United States v. Yazzie, 660 F.2d 422 , 426 n. 3 (10th Cir.1981) (defining absolute disparity as a comparison of the percentage of eligible black persons with the percentage of black persons on the venire), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 923 , 102 S.Ct. 1282 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ivie Clay, a Minor v. Director, Juvenile Division, Department of Corrections
(2×)
But see Crick v. Smith, 650 F.2d 860, 867-68 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); Boyer v. Patton, 579 F.2d 284, 286 (3d Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States Ex Rel. Winters v. DeRobertis
Plainly the identical comity considerations that underlie the exhaustion doctrine, see Rose, 455 U.S. at 518-19, 102 S.Ct. at 1203-04 , argue here for Winters’ raising his ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim under the Post-Conviction Act rather than presenting the thorny problem identified in the preceding paragraph.
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Simon Frank Weise, United States of America v. Simon Frank Weise
(4×)
See United States v. Yazzie, 660 F.2d 422, 431 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 923 , 102 S.Ct. 1282 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982). 7 Finally, Weise challenges the district court's mistaken self-defense instruction.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Simon Frank Weise
See United States v. Yazzie, 660 F.2d 422, 431 (10th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 923 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Agundis
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 792 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (letter addressed to all four defendants by name and referring to a boat, offered for purpose of linking the defendants with one another and to the vessel, was not hearsay); United States v. Canieso, 470 F.2d 1224, 1232 (2d Cir.1972) (letter found in co-defendant’s wallet, which was similar to letter found on defendant, was not hearsay when offered not as proof of statements therein but only as circumstantial evidence that the two defendants were linked).
discussed
Cited "see"
John Douglas Pinchback v. William J. Gibson, Jr., Director
Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 250 (1983); see United States v. Jiles, 658 F.2d 194, 199-200 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 923 (1982). 3 Because an actionable claim requires the denial of a mandated substantive right, Pinchback must show that the failure to provide a proper medical examination affected the amount of work he was obliged to perform.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
(2×)
See United States v. Yazzie, 660 F.2d 422, 431 (10th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 923 , 102 S. Ct. 1282 , 71 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Douglas Emmons v. Robert McLaughlin Donald Ratliff, Gary Dewalt, City of Norwalk, Reese Wineman
See United States v. Jiles, 658 F.2d *358 194, 197 (3rd Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 923 , 102 S.Ct. 1282 , 71 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); see also Pickel v. United States, 746 F.2d 176, 181 (3rd Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Epifanio Sanchez-Lopez Brijido Astorga-Ayon, United States of America v. Antonio Martinez-Ortega, United States of America v. Guillermo Sanchez-Lopez
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 792 (5th Cir.1981) (letter addressed to individuals charged with a conspiracy which was found on a vessel containing contraband was not admitted for its truth, but was relevant evidence admitted for the limited purpose of linking the individuals to the vessel and to each other), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Lopez, 584 F.2d 1175, 1179 (2d Cir.1978) (taped conversation between two persons was not admitted for its truth, but was relevant evidence to show that the two individuals knew each other).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sanchez-Lopez
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 792 (5th Cir.1981) (letter addressed to individuals charged with a conspiracy which was found on a vessel containing contraband was not admitted for its truth, but was relevant evidence admitted for the limited purpose of linking the individuals to the vessel and to each other), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Lopez, 584 F.2d 1175, 1179 (2d Cir.1978) (taped conversation between two persons was not admitted for its truth, but was relevant evidence to show that the two individuals knew each other).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kevin Winston Osborn v. Duane Shillinger, Warden of the Wyoming State Penitentiary A.G. McClintock the Attorney General of the State of Wyoming
Following this rationale, we have consistently held with respect to direct appeals that until the Supreme Court overrules Fay , “we shall apply the rule of that ease at least to situations in which no state appeal has been taken.” Holcomb v. Murphy, 701 F.2d 1307, 1310 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 3546 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1983); see Worthen v. Meachum, 842 F.2d 1179, 1181 (10th Cir.1988); accord Crick v. Smith, 650 F.2d 860, 867 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); Boyer v. Patton, 579 F.2d 284, 286 (3d Cir.1978). 11 Our ow…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Zolp
See United States v. Jiles, 658 F.2d 194, 197 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 923 , 102 S.Ct. 1282 , 71 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); United States v. Prueitt, 540 F.2d 995, 1003-04 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1063 , 97 S.Ct. 790 , 50 L.Ed.2d 780 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Strickland v. Marshall
Chief Justice Burger’s concurring opinion in Sykes indicates that this standard has continuing applicability where the default is the result of a decision made by the defendant himself. 433 U.S. at 92 , 97 S.Ct. at 2509 ; accord, Crick v. Smith, 650 F.2d 860, 863 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Bounds
(2×)
Nothing less than a specific intent to kill must be found before a defendant can be convicted of attempt to commit murder, and the instructions in this respect should be lean and unequivocal in explaining to the jury that only a specific intent to kill will do.” (People v. Santascoy (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 909, 918 [ 200 Cal.Rptr. 709 ]; accord People v. Murtishaw (1981) 29 Cal.3d 733, 762-764 [ 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 ], cert. den. (1982) 455 U.S. 922 [ 71 L.Ed.2d 464 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 ]; People v. Collie (1981) 30 Cal.3d 43, 61-62 [ 177 Cal.Rptr. 458 , 634 P.2d 534 , 23 A.L.R.4th 776…
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Levino Michelena-Orovio
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See, for example, United States v. Mazyak, 5 Cir. 1981, 650 F.2d 788 , cert. denied, 1982, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 ; United States v. Shelnut, 5 Cir.1980, 625 F.2d 59 , cert. denied, 1981, 450 U.S. 983 , 101 S.Ct. 1520 , 67 L.Ed.2d 818 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ira Eugene Borchardt
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 790-91 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Grayson, 625 F.2d 66, 67 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alvaro Chaparro-Almeida
Accord, United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 791 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. DeLeon, 641 F.2d 330, 335 (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. Rodriguez, 585 F.2d 1234 (5th Cir. 1978), aff'd en banc on other grounds, 612 F.2d 906 (1980), aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Chaparro-Almeida
(2×)
Accord, United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 791 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. DeLeon, 641 F.2d 330, 335 (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. Rodriguez, 585 F.2d 1234 (5th Cir. 1978), aff’d en banc on other grounds, 612 F.2d 906 (1980), aff’d sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Saimiento-Rozo
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 791 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862, 886, n.41 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Hartwell Liles, Michael Harold Jones, John Richard Salane
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 791 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Alfrey, 620 F.2d 551 , *993 555-56 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 337 , 66 L.Ed.2d 160 (1980). 9 AFFIRMED. 1 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
the Texas Education Agency and Mike Morath, Commissioner of Education, in His Official Capacity v. Academy of Careers and Technologies, Inc. D/B/A Academy of Careers and Technologies Charter School
See, e.g., United States v. Jiles, 658 F.2d 194, 200 (CA3 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 923 , 102 S.Ct. 1282 , 71 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); Bills v. Henderson, 631 F.2d 1287, 1298-1299 (CA6 1980); Pugliese v. Nelson, 617 F.2d 916, 924-925 (CA2 1980); Cofone v. Manson, 594 F.2d 934, 938 (CA2 1979); Lombardo v. Meachum, 548 F.2d 13, 14-16 (CA1 1977); Adams v. Wainwright, 512 F.Supp. 948, 953 (ND Fla.1981); Lono v. Ariyoshi, 63 Haw., at 144-145 , 621 P.2d, at 980-981 . 13 Petitioners assert that the hearings required by Rule IV not only enable the officials to gather information and thereby to exercise…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Albarran v. State
See e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for pretrial discovery of state’s juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to ‘rap sheets’ of prospectiv…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doster v. State
See e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982)(trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for pretrial discovery of state’s juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to ‘rap sheets’ of prospective…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phillips v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for pretrial discovery of state’s juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to “rap sheets” of prospecti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Billups v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for pretrial discovery of state’s juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to ‘rap sheets’ of prospecti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. State
See e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982)(trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for pretrial discovery of state's juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to `rap sheets' of prospective jurors)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dorsey v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for pretrial discovery of state's juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990)(defendant is not necessarily entitled to `rap sheets' of prospective jurors…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGriff v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, *982 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for pretrial discovery of state's juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to "rap sheets" of prospective …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGriff v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for pretrial discovery of state’s juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to “rap sheets” of prospecti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick C. David
Id. at 297 ; see also United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 792 (5th Cir.1981) (upholding the admission of a letter challenged as hearsay because it was not used to prove the truth of the contents therein, but rather as circumstantial proof that the appellants were associated with each other), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Canieso, 470 F.2d 1224, 1232 (2d Cir.1972) (describing a letter as non-hearsay because it was used merely as circumstantial proof that the parties were linked).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arthur v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for pretrial discovery of state's juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to `rap sheets' of prospective juror…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Milton Edwards, United States of America v. Terry Ratliff, Sr., United States of America v. William Thomas Lawrence, United States of America v. Kerry Chaplin
(2×)
To establish a prima facie violation of the Sixth Amendment-based fair-cross-section requirement, 57 the defendant must show (1) that the group alleged to be excluded is a "distinctive" group in the community; (2) that the representation of this group in venires from which juries are selected is not fair and reasonable in relation to the number of such persons in the community; and (3) that this underrepresentation is due to systematic exclusion of the group in the jury-selection process. 58 Duren, 439 U.S. at 364 , 99 S.Ct. at 668 ; see also United States v. Yazzie, 660 F.2d 422, 425-26 (10th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edwards
(2×)
Duren, 439 U.S. at 364 , 99 S.Ct. at 668 ; see also United States v. Yazzie, 660 F.2d 422, 425-26 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 923 , 102 S.Ct. 1282 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keith Daniel Williams v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, San Quentin State Prison
Compare People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733, 773 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981) (allowing jury under 1977 law to consider evidence not tied to any statutory factor), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982), with Boyd, 38 Cal.3d at 773-74 , 215 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 700 P.2d 782 (reaching opposite conclusion under 1978 law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelley v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw , 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State , 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for pretrial discovery of state's juror information records); State v. Wiggins , 556 So.2d 622 (La.App. 1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to "rap sheets" of prospective ju…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Damian Hawkins and Peter Hawkins
Evid. 801(c); see also United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 792 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Watley
(2×)
See State v. Galvan, 90 N.M. 129 , 560 P.2d 550 (Ct.App.1977); see also United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411 , 101 S.Ct. 690 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 923 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Clark
(2×)
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733, 756 , 631 P.2d 446, 459 , 175 Cal. Rptr. 738, 751 , cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1981); Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331, 333 (Fla. 1978); People v. Davis, 125 Ill.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Houston
(2×)
(People v. Jimenez (1978) 21 Cal.3d 595, 602-608 [ 147 Cal.Rptr. 172 , 580 P.2d 672 ]; see also People v. Murtishaw (1981) 29 Cal.3d 733, 753 [ 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 ], cert. den. (1982) 455 U.S. 922 [ 71 L.Ed.2d 464 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 ].) We think similar principles bear on a finding whether a confession was obtained in violation of the right to counsel. 20 The court below found it could not say beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant’s interrogation had ceased before Attorney Gowdy arrived at the Walnut Creek station.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raul Luis-Gonzalez, Leonardo Espinosa, Oswaldo Carbonell, Marcelian Torres-Gomez, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Mann, 615 F.2d 668 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 994 , 101 S.Ct. 1694 , 68 L.Ed.2d 193 (1981); see generally United States v. Michelena-Orovio, 702 F.2d 496 (5th Cir.) (majority holds that intent to distribute cannot be inferred from the size of the cache and participation in a conspiracy to import; dissent argues that such evidence is sufficient), reh’g en banc granted, 706 F.2d 502 (5th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Levino Michelena-Orovio
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Mann, 615 F.2d 668 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 994 , 101 S.Ct. 1694 , 68 L.Ed.2d 193 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Olim v. Wakinekona
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Jiles, 658 F. 2d 194, 200 (CA3 1981), cert. denied, 455 U. S. 923 (1982); Bills v. Henderson, 631 F. 2d 1287, 1298-1299 (CA6 1980); Pugliese v. Nelson, 617 F. 2d 916, 924-925 (CA2 1980); Cofone v. Manson, 594 F. 2d, at 938 ; Lombardo v. Meachum, 548 F. 2d 13, 14-16 (CA1 1977); Adams v. Wainwright, 512 F. Supp. 948, 953 (ND Fla. 1981); Lono v. Ariyoshi, 63 Haw., at 144-145 , 621 P. 2d, at 980-981 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thanarat Suttiswad
(3×)
See also, United States v. Yazzie, 660 F.2d 422 (10 Cir. 1981), cert. den., --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1282 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David Paul Hammer v. Larry Meachum, Director Oklahoma Department of Corrections and J. M. Sunderland
See, e.g., Crick v. Smith, 650 F.2d 860 (6th Cir. 1981) (applying Fay deliberate bypass test where default was failure to appeal), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); Forman v. Smith, 633 F.2d 634 (2d Cir. 1980) (applying Sykes where petitioner failed to raise issue on direct appeal), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1001 , 101 S.Ct. 1710 , 68 L.Ed.2d 204 (1981); Cole v. Stevenson, 620 F.2d 1055 (4th Cir.) (applying Sykes where petitioner did not raise issue on direct appeal or preserve it at trial), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1004 , 101 S.Ct. 545 , 66 L.Ed.2d 301 (1980); P…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Russell Lee Riker, Jr., William David Fotheringham
See, e.g., United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788 , 790-91 & n.2 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Robbins, 629 F.2d 1105, 1106 (5th Cir. 1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cortez, aka Cortez-Espinoza
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-5713.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1982.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.