green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.5 score
“anticompetitive or exclusionary conduct is unquestionably a necessary element of a 2 attempt.”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Sunshine Books, Ltd. v. Temple University, of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education
anticompetitive or exclusionary conduct is unquestionably a necessary element of a 2 attempt.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
H.L. Hayden Co. of New York v. Siemens Medical Systems, Inc.
Id. at 791.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
H.L. Hayden Co. Of New York, Inc. v. Siemens Medical Systems, Inc.
Id. at 791. 65 The district court concluded that, construing the available evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, Healthco and Patterson each had, at a maximum, "approximately 20% of the dental equipment market." Hayden, 672 F.Supp. at 741 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Damiani v. Adams
Rather, this lawsuit more closely parallels the facts of Wood v. McEwen, 644 F.2d 797 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1437 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982), where the court awarded attorney’s fees against a pro se litigant after he had filed thirty-seven actions that repeatedly raised the same claims, and had “become burdensome and costly to the litigants.” Id. at 802.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sederquist v. Court
See United States v. Ford, 650 F.2d 1141, 1143-44 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1437 , 71 L.Ed. 2d 654 (1982) (citing Reiser, 605 F.2d at 1140 ); Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp., 645 F.2d 699, 700 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 976 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sederquist v. Court
See United States v. Ford, 650 F.2d 1141, 1143-44 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1437 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982) (citing Reiser, 605 F.2d at 1140 ); Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp., 645 F.2d 699, 700 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 976 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981). 22 However, these cases are not helpful because the attorneys' fees claims were against parties in the original suit and that suit had not been dismissed.
discussed
Cited "see"
S-1 and S-2, by and Through Their Parents and Guardians Ad Litem P-1 and P-2 P-1 and P-2, Individually v. C.D. Spangler, Jr., Chairman, State Board of Education of North Carolina the State Board of Education of North Carolina C.D. Heidgerd, Hearing Officer, Asheboro City Board of Education, and the Asheboro City Board of Education Mary Smitherman
See United States v. Ford, 650 F.2d 1141, 1143 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1437 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 ; Doe v. Marshall, 622 F.2d 118, 119-20 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 993 , 101 S.Ct. 2336 , 68 L.Ed.2d 855 ; Flesch v. Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute, 472 F.Supp. 798, 802 (E.D.Pa.1979) ("Any other rule would largely nullify the mootness doctrine with respect to cases brought under the myriad federal statutes that authorize fee awards.") Neither does a determination of mootness of the action on the merits preclude an award of attorney's fees on reman…
discussed
Cited "see"
S-1 v. Spangler
See United States v. Ford, 650 F.2d 1141, 1143 (9th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1437 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 ; Doe v. Marshall, 622 F.2d 118, 119-20 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 993 , 101 S.Ct. 2336 , 68 L.Ed.2d 855 ; Flesch v. Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute, 472 F.Supp. 798, 802 (E.D.Pa.1979) ("Any other rule would largely nullify the mootness doctrine with respect to cases brought under the myriad federal statutes that authorize fee awards.”).
cited
Cited "see"
International Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Walsh Trucking Co.
See Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 85 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
International Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Walsh Trucking Co.
See Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 85 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Northeastern Telephone Co. v. AT & T, 651 F.2d 76, 86 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982); Areeda & Turner, Predatory Pricing and Related Practices Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 88 Harv.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bohack Corp. v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.
Accord Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 95 (2d Cir.1981) (setting aside liability findings in Sherman Act case and ordering retrial as to both liability and damages), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982); Caskey v. Village of Wayland, 375 F.2d 1004, 1009-10 (2d Cir.1967) (vacating judgment in negligence action because of error in charge on damages, but ordering retrial of both liability and damages issues); Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc., 663 F.2d 930 (9th Cir.1981) (requiring retrial of liability and damages issues in R…
discussed
Cited "see"
1983-2 Trade Cases P 65,527, 13 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1799 the Bohack Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, and Waldbaum, Inc., C.P. Sales, Inc., Walter Bodenstein and Ira Waldbaum
Accord Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 95 (2d Cir.1981) (setting aside liability findings in Sherman Act case and ordering retrial as to both liability and damages), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982); Caskey v. Village of Wayland, 375 F.2d 1004, 1009-10 (2d Cir.1967) (vacating judgment in negligence action because of error in charge on damages, but ordering retrial of both liability and damages issues); Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc., 663 F.2d 930 (9th Cir.1981) (requiring retrial of liability and damages issues in R…
cited
Cited "see"
Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
See Wood v. McEwen, 644 F.2d 797, 799-800 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1437 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bishop v. Committee On Professional Ethics & Conduct of Iowa State Bar Ass'n
See United States v. Ford, 650 F.2d 1141, 1143 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, Midwest Growers Cooperative v. United States, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1437 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982); Williams v. Alioto, 625 F.2d 845, 847-48 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 1723 , 68 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981); Doe v. Marshall, 622 F.2d 118, 120 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 993 , 101 S.Ct. 2336 , 68 L.Ed.2d 855 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gary T. Bishop v. Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Association and Its Chairman, James E. Cooney, in His Official Capacity, Gary T. Bishop v. Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Association and Its Chairman, James E. Cooney, in His Official Capacity, (Two Cases)
See United States v. Ford, 650 F.2d 1141, 1143 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, Midwest Growers Cooperative v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1437 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982); Williams v. Alioto, 625 F.2d 845, 847-48 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 1723 , 68 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981); Doe v. Marshall, 622 F.2d 118, 120 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 993 , 101 S.Ct. 2336 , 68 L.Ed.2d 855 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re: Stock Exchanges Options Trading Antitrust Litigation
We therefore hold that with respect to the activities challenged in Count I of the complaint, the Sherman Act has been displaced by the pervasive regulatory scheme established by the Maloney and Investment Company Acts. 61 NASD, 422 U.S. at 734-35, 95 S.Ct. 2427 (footnotes omitted) (emphasis added); see also id. at 722, 95 S.Ct. 2427 (finding "no way to reconcile the Commission's power to authorize these restrictions with the competing mandate of the antitrust laws"). 62 In light of the Supreme Court's decisions in Silver, Gordon, and NASD, this Court has summarized the implied repeal doctrine…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
See, e.g., Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 87 (2d Cir.1981) (determination of appropriate measure of cost for use in predation analysis is “legal question”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patricia L. Preston La Juan M. Mitchell Leonard Jamar Preston v. United States
See also Wood v. McEwen, 644 F.2d 797, 802 (9th Cir.1981) (per curiam) (recusal motion under 28 U.S.C. § 144 untimely where made sixteen months after grounds for disqualification arose), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1437 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982); United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 879-80 (9th Cir.) (where defendant was aware before trial of grounds for recusal under section 455, issue could not be raised for first time on appeal absent “exceptional circumstances”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
H. Floyd McGahee v. Northern Propane Gas Company
Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. AT & T, 740 F.2d 980, 1005-07 (D.C.Cir.1984) (expressing doubt about the usefulness of fully distributed costs as a measure of costs in predatory pricing cases), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985); MCI Communications v. AT & T, 708 F.2d 1081, 1114-23 (7th Cir.) (holding that long run marginal cost, not fully distributed cost, is the appropriate measure of total cost), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983); see also Northeastern Telephone Co. v. AT & T, 651 F.2d 76, 86-91 (2d Cir.1981) (holding…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
R.C. Bigelow, Inc. v. Unilever N.V.
It is clear, however, that “[t]he mere possession of monopoly power does not ipso facto condemn a market participant.” Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 275 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980); see also Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 84-85 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation
See also Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 88 (CA2 1981) ("[N]owhere in the recent outpouring of literature on the subject do commentators suggest that [predatory] pricing is either common or likely to increase"), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982). 29 These observations apply even to predatory pricing by a single firm seeking monopoly power.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barry Wright Corporation v. Itt Grinnell Corporation
See, e.g., Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 88 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tif Instruments, Inc. v. Colette
See also Wood v. McEwen, 644 F.2d 797, 802 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1437 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982); United States v. Rayco, Inc., 616 F.2d 462 , 464 (10th Cir.1980). 5 Colette's final salvo is that the merits of this case are not yet finally resolved because the judge did not address their counterclaims.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
TIF Instruments, Inc. v. Colette
See also Wood v. McEwen, 644 F.2d 797, 802 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1437 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982); United States v. Rayco, Inc., 616 F.2d 462 , 464 (10th Cir.1980). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Richter Concrete Corporation, the Collinwood Shale Brick and Supply Company v. Hilltop Concrete Corporation
See, e.g., Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Midwest Growers Cooperative
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-1074.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1982.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.