green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.1 score
“the adea targets discrimination against employees who fall within a protected age category, not employees who have attained a given seniority status”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLAY PRINTING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
(3×)
As the Seventh Circuit stated in Metz, "[c]ourts have ... emphatically rejected business practices in which 'the plain intent and effect ... was to eliminate older workers who had built up, through years of satisfactory service, higher salaries than their younger counterparts.' " Id. at 1206 (quoting Leftwich v. HarrisStowe State College, 702 F.2d 686 , 691 (8th Cir.1983); see Abbott v. Federal Forge, Inc., 912 F.2d 867, 875 (6th Cir.1990) (seniority is illegitimate basis for employment decisions when it adversely affects older employees); Jardien v. Winston Network, Inc., 888 F.2d 1151, 1157-…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kreimeyer v. Hercules Inc.
the adea targets discrimination against employees who fall within a protected age category, not employees who have attained a given seniority status
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Popko v. City of Clairton
(i)t is beyond peradventure that (the act) in fact covers reduction-in-force cases.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferguson v. Waffle House, Inc.
O’Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp., 56 F.3d 542, 548-549 (4th Cir.1995), rev’d on other grounds, 517 U.S. 308 , 116 S.Ct. 1307 , 134 L.Ed.2d 433 (1996); Black’s Law Dictionary, 460 (6th Ed.1990) (citing State v. McClure, 504 S.W.2d 664, 668 (Mo.Ct.App.1974)); see Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 130 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Marshall v. AT & T MOBILITY
O’Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp., 56 F.3d 542, 548-549 (4th Cir.1995), rev’d on other grounds, 517 U.S. 308 , 116 S.Ct. 1307 , 134 L.Ed.2d 433 (1996); Black’s Law Dictionary, 460 (6th Ed. 1990) (citing State v. McClure, 504 S.W.2d 664, 668 (Mo.Ct.App.1974)); see Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 130 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982). 14 .
cited
Cited "see"
Chacko v. Texas a & M University
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 129 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Hernandez v. Exxon Corp.
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 129 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Valle v. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc.
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120 , 130-81 n. 17 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982). 9 Nor does Valle present evidence of adverse employment decisions with regard to other employees that tends to show unlawful discrimination in Valle’s case.
cited
Cited "see"
Brooks v. New Hampshire Supreme Court
See State v. Merski, 121 N.H. 901 , 437 A.2d 710, 715 (N.H.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Melton
(2×)
See People v. Gomez, 632 P.2d 586 (Colo.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Oynes
See People v. Gomez, 632 P.2d 586 (Colo.1981) (no “search” where officer standing on entrance walkway looked through curtain opening into motel room), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982); People v. Donald, 637 P.2d 392 (Colo.1981) (no “search” where officer standing on common entrance viewed illegal activity in apartment through a window).
cited
Cited "see"
Patton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120,129 (5th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
McMillan v. Department of the Interior
(2×)
McCarthy, 850 F.2d at 560 ; see Capitol Industries-EMI, Inc. v. Bennett, 681 F.2d 1107 , 1118 n. 29 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982); Thornhill Publishing Co. v. General Tel. & Electronics Corp., 594 F.2d 730 , 733 (9th Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Humphreys v. Medical Towers, Ltd.
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 129 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Aikens v. Banana Republic, Inc.
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 129 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hallett v. United States
(2×)
McCarthy v. United States, 850 F.2d 558, 560 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1052 , 109 S.Ct. 1312 , 103 L.Ed.2d 581 (1989); see Capitol Industries-EMI, Inc. v. Bennett, 681 F.2d 1107 , 1118 n. 29 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982); Thornhill Publishing Co., 594 F.2d at 733 .
cited
Cited "see"
Wen-Hsien Lo v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 129 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982). 10.
cited
Cited "see"
Anderson v. HCA Deer Park Hospital
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 129 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982). 8.
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Bell
See People v. Gomez, 632 P.2d 586 (Colo.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
International Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Walsh Trucking Co.
See Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 85 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
International Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Walsh Trucking Co.
See Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 85 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cook v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 129 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (“ADEA mandates that an employer reach employment decisions without regard to age”), cert. denied, *826 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
MacHakos v. Meese
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 130 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982) (“[T]he evidence must lead the factfinder reasonably to conclude [that age discrimination occurred].” (Emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dorothy E. Dreyer and Naomi D. Strayer v. Arco Chemical Company, a Division of Atlantic Richfield Company
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 129 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982); see also Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111 , 118 n. 13 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 348 , 78 L.Ed.2d 314 (1983) (nature of plaintiffs showing depends on circumstances of the case); Thompson, Houserman & Jordan, Age Discrimination in Reduction-in-Force: The Metamorphosis of McDonnell Douglas Continues, 8 Indus.Rel.L.Rev. 47, 57-58 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Reed v. Signode Corp.
See Defendants’ Memorandum at 13, citing Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 129 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Michael L.
(2×)
Ct. (1979) 197 Colo. 38, 46 [ 589 P.2d 924 ], italics added; accord People v. Gomez (1979) 198 Colo. 105, 111 [ 596 P.2d 1192 ], cert. den. (1982) 455 U.S. 943 [ 71 L.Ed.2d 655 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 ]; People ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Oxman v. WLS-TV
McDonnell Douglas, 411 U.S. at 802 n. 13, 93 S.Ct. at 1824 n. 13; see Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120 , 129 n. 12 (5th Cir.1981) (modifying test in ADEA “reduction-in-force” case), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Matthews v. Allis-Chalmers
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 128 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Northeastern Telephone Co. v. AT & T, 651 F.2d 76, 86 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982); Areeda & Turner, Predatory Pricing and Related Practices Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 88 Harv.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bohack Corp. v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.
Accord Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 95 (2d Cir.1981) (setting aside liability findings in Sherman Act case and ordering retrial as to both liability and damages), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982); Caskey v. Village of Wayland, 375 F.2d 1004, 1009-10 (2d Cir.1967) (vacating judgment in negligence action because of error in charge on damages, but ordering retrial of both liability and damages issues); Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc., 663 F.2d 930 (9th Cir.1981) (requiring retrial of liability and damages issues in R…
discussed
Cited "see"
1983-2 Trade Cases P 65,527, 13 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1799 the Bohack Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, and Waldbaum, Inc., C.P. Sales, Inc., Walter Bodenstein and Ira Waldbaum
Accord Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 95 (2d Cir.1981) (setting aside liability findings in Sherman Act case and ordering retrial as to both liability and damages), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982); Caskey v. Village of Wayland, 375 F.2d 1004, 1009-10 (2d Cir.1967) (vacating judgment in negligence action because of error in charge on damages, but ordering retrial of both liability and damages issues); Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc., 663 F.2d 930 (9th Cir.1981) (requiring retrial of liability and damages issues in R…
cited
Cited "see"
31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 832, 31 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,516 William Massarsky and Gertrude Massarsky, His Wife, in No. 82-5176 v. General Motors Corporation, a Corporation of the State of Delaware, in No. 82-5177
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 123 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Massarsky v. General Motors Corp.
See Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 123 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re: Stock Exchanges Options Trading Antitrust Litigation
We therefore hold that with respect to the activities challenged in Count I of the complaint, the Sherman Act has been displaced by the pervasive regulatory scheme established by the Maloney and Investment Company Acts. 61 NASD, 422 U.S. at 734-35, 95 S.Ct. 2427 (footnotes omitted) (emphasis added); see also id. at 722, 95 S.Ct. 2427 (finding "no way to reconcile the Commission's power to authorize these restrictions with the competing mandate of the antitrust laws"). 62 In light of the Supreme Court's decisions in Silver, Gordon, and NASD, this Court has summarized the implied repeal doctrine…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
See, e.g., Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 87 (2d Cir.1981) (determination of appropriate measure of cost for use in predation analysis is “legal question”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brook v. City of Montgomery, Ala.
See also Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 130 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982) (citing as an example of direct evidence a scrap of paper on which is written “Too old-Lay Off”); Simmons v. McGuffey Nursing Home, Inc., 619 F.2d 369, 371 (5th Cir.1980) (remark that board wanted younger man did not indicate that the plaintiff was terminated because of his age).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard Ludovicy v. Dunkirk Radiator Corporation
See 29 U.S.C. § 631 (a); see also Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120 , 130 n. 17 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
H. Floyd McGahee v. Northern Propane Gas Company
Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. AT & T, 740 F.2d 980, 1005-07 (D.C.Cir.1984) (expressing doubt about the usefulness of fully distributed costs as a measure of costs in predatory pricing cases), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985); MCI Communications v. AT & T, 708 F.2d 1081, 1114-23 (7th Cir.) (holding that long run marginal cost, not fully distributed cost, is the appropriate measure of total cost), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983); see also Northeastern Telephone Co. v. AT & T, 651 F.2d 76, 86-91 (2d Cir.1981) (holding…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
R.C. Bigelow, Inc. v. Unilever N.V.
It is clear, however, that “[t]he mere possession of monopoly power does not ipso facto condemn a market participant.” Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 275 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980); see also Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 84-85 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harry Kast v. Fulton Industries, Inc.
See also Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982). 24 The plaintiff in such reorganization cases must come forward with additional direct, circumstantial, or statistical evidence that age was a factor in his termination in order to establish a prima facie case.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eivins v. Adventist Health System/Eastern & Middle America, Inc.
See also Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 129 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Poklitar v. CBS, INC.
See, e.g., Williams v. *1029 General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 129-30 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982); Meschino v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., 563 F.Supp. 1066, 1069-71 (S.D.N.Y.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation
See also Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 88 (CA2 1981) ("[N]owhere in the recent outpouring of literature on the subject do commentators suggest that [predatory] pricing is either common or likely to increase"), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982). 29 These observations apply even to predatory pricing by a single firm seeking monopoly power.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Earl HOLLEY, Appellee, v. SANYO MANUFACTURING, INC., Appellant
We agree with the Sixth Circuit that “[t]he mere termination of a competent employee when an employer is making cutbacks due to economic necessity is insufficient to establish a prima facie case of age discrimination” and that the “plaintiff in such reorganization cases must come forward with additional * * * evidence that age was a factor in his termination in order to establish a prima facie case.” 8 LaGrant v. Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co., Inc., 748 F.2d 1087, 1090-91 (6th Cir.1984); see also Hedrick v. Hercules, Inc., 658 F.2d 1088, 1094 (5th Cir.1981) (prima facie ADEA reducti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harvey & Harvey, Inc. v. Delaware Solid Waste Authority
(2×)
See also Capitol Industries-EMI, Inc. v. Bennett, 681 F.2d 1107, 1112, n. 12 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982); Robinson Protective Alarm Co. v. City of Philadelphia, 581 F.2d 371, 375 (3d Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles LaGRANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GULF & WESTERN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee
See also Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982). *1091 The plaintiff in such reorganization cases must come forward with additional direct, circumstantial, or statistical evidence that age was a factor in his termination in order to establish a prima facie case.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barry Wright Corporation v. Itt Grinnell Corporation
See, e.g., Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 651 F.2d 76, 88 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1438 , 71 L.Ed.2d 654 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., Harold H. Thurston and Nicholas Vasilaros, Defendants- Intervenors Harold H. Thurston, Christopher J. Clark and C. A. Parkhill, Plaintiffs- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. And Air Line Pilots Association, International
See, e.g., Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 129-30 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982); EEOC v. TWA, 544 F.Supp. 1187, 1218 (S.D.N.Y.1982). 61 Nor does our holding result, as ALPA argues, in the elimination of mandatory retirement before age 70.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Air Line Pilots Ass'n International v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
See, e.g., Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 129-30 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982); EEOC v. TWA, 544 F.Supp. 1187, 1218 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Sporleder
(2×)
See, e.g., People v. Gomez, 632 P.2d 586 (Colo.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982); Charnes v. DiGiacomo, supra; People v. Weisenberger, supra. In our opinion the defendant’s privacy expectation, when measured against this dual standard, qualifies for constitutional protection under Article II, Section 7 of the Colorado Constitution.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sangiacomo
v.
Zigas
v.
Zigas
No. 81-1085.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. Pennsylvania (1) · D. Utah (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.