green
Positive treatment
10.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Marisa Lemm, United States of America v. Phyllis Ellen Stonys, United States of America v. Val Bolton Maghee
(2×)
Delph v. United States and Hawkins v. United States, 439 U.S. 953 , 99 S.Ct. 349 , 58 L.Ed.2d 344 (1978); but see United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1191-95 (5th Cir. 1981) (explaining Elliott), cert, denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 and sub nom.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Andrews
Riccobene, 709 F.2d at 224-25 ; United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1192 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 5.Ct. 1451, 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
BankAtlantic v. Coast to Coast Contractors, Inc.
(2×)
See Haile v. Henderson National Bank, 657 F.2d 816, 824-26 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1450 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982); Pioneer Properties, Inc. v. Martin, 557 F.Supp. 1354, 1358 (D.Kan.1983); In re Prospect Hill Resources, Inc., 69 B.R. 79, 80 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Vision Communications, Inc.
See Haile v. Henderson Nat'l Bank, 657 F.2d 816, 823 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 (1982); 7 JAMES W.
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Vision Communications, Inc.
See Haile v. Henderson Nat’l Bank, 657 F.2d 816, 823 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 (1982); 7 James W.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bonton v. Archer Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 , 1187 n. 4 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 991, 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 1617, 71 L.Ed.2d 663 , 852 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Lamar Faulkner, Spencer H. Blain, Jr., James L. Toler and Arthur Formann
(2×)
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 , 1190 n. 6 (5th Cir.1981) ("A strong argument can be made that a variance between a single conspiracy indictment and evidence of multiple conspiracies should be treated not as a 'variance' problem at all, but rather as a 'mis-joinder' question under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 8(b).”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982). 22 .
cited
Cited "see"
Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.
See Haile v. Henderson Nat’l Bank, 657 F.2d 816 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1450 , 71 L.Ed.2d 668 (1982) (discussing nationwide reach of federal receivers). 111.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond James Nelson
(2×)
See White at 717 (citing United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1203 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Burger
(2×)
See United States v. Eden, 659 F.2d 1376, 1381 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1450 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Boylan
(2×)
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1189, 1194 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca1 1990
(2×)
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1189, 1194 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca11 1990
(2×)
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1200 (5th Cir. Unit A Sept.1981) ("Recordings must be excluded only if the inaudible or unintelligible portions 'are so substantial as to render the recording as a whole untrustworthy,' and that determination 'is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge.' " (quoting United States v. Mendoza, 574 F.2d 1373, 1378 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 988 , 99 S.Ct. 584 , 58 L.Ed.2d 661 (1978))), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982). 14 27 Burke's second claim is that the recording was hearsay.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sherman v. Burke Contracting, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1200 (5th Cir. Unit A Sept. 1981) (“Recordings must be excluded only if the inaudible or unintelligible portions ‘are so substantial as to render the recording as a whole untrustworthy,’ and that determination ‘is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge.’ ” (quoting United States v. Mendoza, 574 F.2d 1373, 1378 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 988 , 99 S.Ct. 584 , 58 L.Ed.2d 661 (1978))), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982). 14 Burke’s second claim is that the recording was hearsay.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stanford Champion, Gene Slusser, Eldon L. Morgan, Jr., Lester Spainhoward, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 (5th Cir. Unit A Sept. 1981) 16 (evidence of a common conspirator and similar objectives insufficient to support finding of single conspiracy), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Bruun and Ronald Berkovitz
(2×)
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 , 1190 n. 6 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 991, 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 1617, 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Erwin
(2×)
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 ,1189 n. 5 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Erwin
(2×)
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 , 1189 n. 5 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982). 18 The court may decide, as a matter of law, that the evidence fails to raise a factual question for the jury.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sam Qaoud Evan H. Callanan, Sr. Evan H. Callanan, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1198 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982); United States v. Robinson, 763 F.2d 778, 785 (6th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arturo Rodriguez, Vincente Ramirez
(2×)
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1195-96 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981) cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Temengil v. Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands
Accord United States v. Eden, 659 F.2d 1376, 1380 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 ; 102 S.Ct. 1450 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982); United States v. Johnson. 596 F.2d 842, 846 (9th Cir. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul Santo
(2×)
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1189-93 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982); United States v. Elliott, 571 F.2d 880, 902-03 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 953 , 99 S.Ct. 349 , 58 L.Ed.2d 344 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mario Adamo, Richard Marsico, Terry Freeman, Raymond Ripley, Jeffrey Linkous, Ectore Garcia, and Winthrop Hong
(2×)
Accord, United States v. Eden, 659 F.2d 1376, 1382 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1450 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alcorn County, Mississippi v. U.S. Interstate Supplies, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1186 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 1617, 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982). 15 The testimony of Cutchens, if believed by the jury, establishes that she, Creditor and USIS through the commission of these acts, constituting a pattern of racketeering activity, participated in an “enterprise” which affected interstate commerce.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Anthony White
(2×)
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1203 (5th Cir.1981) (challenge to evidence through another witness or prior inconsistent statements insufficient to establish prosecutorial use of false testimony), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Scielzo
(4×)
The criterion thus impinges upon ‘jury’ discretion only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.” (Emphasis in original.) (Footnotes omitted.) Jackson v. Virginia, supra, 319 ; see United States v. Eden, 659 F.2d 1376, 1382 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S. Ct. 1450 , 71 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tomison
(2×)
Bowman Dairy, 341 U.S. at 221 , 71 S.Ct. at 679 ; see also United States v. Eden, 659 F.2d 1376, 1381 (9th Cir.1981) (determination of whether to issue a subpoena is committed to sound discretion of trial court), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1450 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
(2×)
See United States v. Mammoth Oil Co., 14 F.2d 705, 717, 731 (8th Cir.1926), aff'd, 275 U.S. 13 , 48 S.Ct. 1 , 72 L.Ed. 137 (1927) (unnecessary to have direct evidence of bribes); see also United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1186-89 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alicio M. Sanchez (89-2432) and Reinaldo Cubilla (89-2433)
(2×)
United States v. Davenport, 808 F.2d 1212 (6th Cir.1987); United States v. Warner, 690 F.2d 545 (6th Cir.1982); see also United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re: D. H. Overmyer Telecasting Co., Inc., Co., Inc., Debtor
See, e.g., Haile v. Henderson Nat'l Bank, 657 F.2d 816 (6th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 (1982).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Local 560, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1191-95 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982); United States v. Diecidue, 603 F.2d 535, 553-55 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 946 , 100 S.Ct. 1345 , 63 L.Ed.2d 781 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Clarence Samuel Robinson (80-5479), James Harold Coldiron (80-5480), Charles T. Cornett (80-5481)
(2×)
See also United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 , 1200 n. 15 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
First National Bank of Alabama-Huntsville, formerly Henderson National Bank
v.
Haile
v.
Haile
No. 81-1243.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1982.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.