green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard Gobern
(4×)
See United States v. Watkins, 662 F.2d 1090, 1097-98 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 1613 , 71 L.Ed.2d 849 (1982). 78 A defendant is guilty of aiding and abetting if he has "knowingly associated himself with and participated in the criminal venture." United States v. Winstead, 708 F.2d 925, 927 (4th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Royal Crown Cola Co., Cross-Appellant v. The Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico, Inc., and Dr. Pepper Co., Cross-Appellees
(2×)
See United States v. Marengo County Commission, 667 F.Supp. 786 (S.D.Ala.1987) and United States v. Terminal Transport Co., 653 F.2d 1016 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 1613 , 71 L.Ed.2d 849 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson v. Sawyer
(2×)
See Allen v. Terminal Transport Co., 486 F.Supp. 1195, 1203 (N.D.Ga.1980), aff'd, 638 F.2d 1232 (5th Cir.1981), modified on other grounds, 653 F.2d 1016 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 1613 , 71 L.Ed.2d 849 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. MacDougall
(2×)
See also United States v. Watkins, 662 F.2d 1090, 1097 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 1613 , 71 L.Ed.2d 849 (1982); United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067, 1075 (4th Cir.) (simply proving the existence of a conspiracy cannot sustain a verdict against an individual defendant; proof of that defendant’s knowledge of the conspiracy’s purpose and some action indicating participation required), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald Bruce MacDougall United States of America v. Kenneth Wayne Gunn, United States of America v. Cleveland Sanders, United States of America v. Michael Lee Harvey, United States of America v. Cleveland Sanders, United States of America v. Kenneth Wayne Gunn, United States of America v. Donald Bruce MacDougall United States of America v. Michael Lee Harvey
(2×)
See also United States v. Watkins, 662 F.2d 1090, 1097 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 1613 , 71 L.Ed.2d 849 (1982); United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067, 1075 (4th Cir.) (simply proving the existence of a conspiracy cannot sustain a verdict against an individual defendant; proof of that defendant's knowledge of the conspiracy's purpose and some action indicating participation required), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Espinosa
(2×)
"For the most part the evidence which connects the defendants to the conspiracy also supports a finding that they aided and abetted others in possession." United States v. Butler, 611 F.2d 1066, 1073 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 830 , 101 S.Ct. 97 , 66 L.Ed.2d 35 (1980) (citing United States v. Soto, 591 F.2d 1091, 1103 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 930 , 99 S.Ct. 2862 , 61 L.Ed.2d 298 (1979)); see also United States v. McMahon, 562 F.2d at 1196 (insufficient evidence to support the conspiracy conviction because "deficiencies in the Government's case on the substantive counts [of th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas Manbeck, United States of America v. Kenneth Herring, United States of America v. Mark Huiet Sale, United States of America v. Lorenz Josephus Proden, United States of America v. Kermit Theodore Brogden, United States of America v. John Wesley Flannel, United States of America v. Gary Gallopo, United States of America v. John Benjamin Barton, Jr., Jessie Lee Mallory, and Arthur Duncan, United States of America v. John O'hare, Eddie Brantley, Thomas Earnest Folske, Thomas Sams Hightower, Timothy Allen Laxton, Harrell Lewis, Jr., and John Isidore Stevens, United States of America v. Aaron Douglas Staetter, John Michael Iyoob, James Anthony Hastings, and Gregory Michael Scott, United States of America v. David Martin Summerville
(2×)
See also United States v. Watkins, 662 F.2d 1090, 1097-98 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 1613 , 71 L.Ed.2d 849 (1982), which treated the quantity of marijuana involved as relevant to possession with intent to distribute. 89 For the reasons stated, I would affirm the convictions of the defendants for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute on Count Two, as well as affirming the defendants' remaining convictions. * Honorable Walter E.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Manbeck
(2×)
See also United States v. Watkins, 662 F.2d 1090, 1097-98 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 1613 , 71 L.Ed.2d 849 (1982), which treated the quantity of marijuana involved as relevant to possession with intent to distribute.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Catalina
v.
City of Columbus, Ohio and Ohio ex rel. Catalina v. Moody, Mayor of Columbus
v.
City of Columbus, Ohio and Ohio ex rel. Catalina v. Moody, Mayor of Columbus
No. 81-1123.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1982.
Published
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.