green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Woodard v. Villmer
tates need not implement all possible procedural safeguards against erroneous deprivation of liberty when utilizing results of scientific testing devices in accusatory proceedings
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jack Howard Potts, Cross-Appellant v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cross-Appellee
(4×)
to succeed on a claim of double jeopardy, a defendant must show that in law and fact the two offenses charged are in reality the same.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Reginald Chavers
See Murphy v. Hunt, 455 U.S. 478, 481 , 102 S.Ct. 1181 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982) (observing that defendant’s “claim to pretrial bail was moot once he was convicted” (emphasis in original)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nettles v. Griffith
(2×)
See Smith v. Rabalais, 659 F.2d 539, 542 (5th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vasquez v. Coughlin
(2×)
See Smith v. Rabalais, 659 F.2d 539, 546 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Lee Atkins
(2×)
Id. at 153 ; accord United States v. Henry, 661 F.2d 894, 896 (5th Cir. Unit B Nov. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
John Harvey Adamson v. James G. Ricketts, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
(4×)
See Adamson v. Hill, 667 F.2d 1030 (9th Cir., 1983), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982) 2 The judge asked "At this point do you believe you understand the provisions of the plea agreement?" Adamson answered "Entirely sir." The judge then asked Adamson "Do you have any questions that you want to ask me about before we go any further?" and Adamson answered "No sir." Transcript, Change of Plea, January 15, 1977, at 7 3 Paragraph 5 of the plea agreement provides: It is agreed by all parties that the defendant shall testify truthfully and completely at all times, wh…
cited
Cited "see"
Hill v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution
Accord Smith v. Rabalais, 659 F.2d 539, 545 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. *202 denied, 455 U.S. 992 (1982); Wilwording v. Swenson, 502 F.2d 844, 851 (8th Cir. 1974), cert, denied, 420 U.S. 912 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Broussard v. Johnson
(2×)
In addition, the determination of the factfinder must be supported by “some evidence in the record.” Id.; see also Smith v. Rabalais, 659 F.2d 539, 545 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leeroy B. Bostic, Jr. v. Peter Carlson, Warden
(2×)
See, e.g., Smith v. Rabalais, 659 F.2d 539, 545 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vogelsang v. Coombe
We have heretofore concluded that a statement from a witness with direct knowledge of the incident involved, without more, is sufficient to support a prison disciplinary decision (Matter of Garcia v LeFevre, 102 AD2d 1004 ; see, also, Smith v Rabalais, 659 F2d 539, 546, cert den 455 US 992 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grandison v. Cuyler
(2×)
See, e.g., Smith v. Rabalais, 659 F.2d 539, 545 (5th Cir.1981) (courts must consider ‘whether any evidence at all’ supports hearing committee decision) (quoting Willis v. Ciccone, 506 F,2d 1011, 1019 n. 11 (8th Cir.1974)), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Albert W. Coachman
(2×)
See also United States v. Henry, 661 F.2d 894, 896 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982); United States v. Ward, 696 F.2d 1315, 1319 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, -- U.S. --, 103 S.Ct. 2101 , 77 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nathaniel Dudley, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. D. Lamar Stewart
(2×)
See also Smith v. Rabalais, 659 F.2d 539, 543 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981) (transfer to maximum security is “obviously a deprivation of ‘liberty’ ” and entitles prisoner to minimal due process, citing Wolff), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sammy Lee Ward, Edward B. Prows, A/K/A Teddy
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Henry, 661 F.2d 894, 896 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982); United States v. Marable, 578 F.2d 151, 154 (5th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baird v. State
Compare Townsend v. State, (1981) Ind.App., 418 N.E.2d 554, 558 , cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1619 , 71 L.Ed.2d 853 (1982) with Harrington v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 413 N.E.2d 622, 625 (pre-code decision).
Hicks
v.
Rose, Warden, Tennessee State Penitentiary
v.
Rose, Warden, Tennessee State Penitentiary
No. 81-6013.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1982.
Cited by 59 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (4) · E.D. Missouri (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.