St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Vanskike, 455 U.S. 1000 (1982). · Go Syfert
Search
St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Vanskike, 455 U.S. 1000 (1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
154 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 46 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Sealed Case (cadc, 1982-04-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re Sealed Case
D.C. Cir. · 1982 · confidence medium
In one very recent case, In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.ct. 1632, 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982), the court apparently assumed that the government would have to show both crime or fraud and extraordinary necessity in order to withstand a motion to quash a grand jury’s subpoena for an attorney’s opinion work product.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Regan
E.D. Va. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re John Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1079 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Whitehead v. Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline
Nev. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073 , 1080 (4th Cir.1981) (prima facie showing of illegal activity upon the part of the attorney was sufficient to overcome the work product protection), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982); Diamond v. Stratton, 95 F.R.D. 503, 506 (S.D.N.Y.1982) (substantial need for documents shown where they shed direct light on motive and knowledge of defendant and counsel, and actions of counsel were an issue in the case); Donovan v. Fitzsimmons, 90 F.R.D. 583, 588 (N.D.Ill. 1981) (to the extent that the advice of counsel is a critical area of inqui…
cited Cited "see" Hohenwater v. Roberts Pharmaceutical Corp.
D.S.C. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1081 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Nos. 91-1873, 91-1874
4th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doe v. United States (In re Doe), 662 F.2d 1073, 1078 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982). 91 Determining whether work product immunity is available requires a three step analysis.
cited Cited "see" Sandberg v. Virginia Bankshares, Inc.
4th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doe v. United States (In re Doe), 662 F.2d 1073, 1078 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Mason v. Texaco, Inc.
D. Kan. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vanskike v. ACF Indus., Inc., 665 F.2d 188 , 201-02 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982); National Business Lists, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 552 F.Supp. 99, 101 (N.D.Ill.1982).
cited Cited "see" In Re Martin Marietta Corporation, United States of America v. William C. Pollard
4th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073 , 1081 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982).
cited Cited "see" In re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Litigation
C.D. Cal. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1079 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 604 F.2d 798, 801 (3d Cir.1979).
discussed Cited "see" Laney v. Coleman Company
8th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vanskike v. ACF Industries, 665 F.2d 188 , 194-95 (8th Cir.1981) (applying Missouri law), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982); Jarrell v. Fort Worth Steel & Manufacturing Co., 666 S.W.2d 828, 834 (Mo.App.1984).
discussed Cited "see" Laney v. Coleman Co.
8th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vanskike v. ACF Industries, 665 F.2d 188 , 194-95 (8th Cir.1981) (applying Missouri law), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982); Jarrell v. Fort Worth Steel & Manufacturing Co., 666 S.W.2d 828, 834 (Mo.Ct.App.1984).
discussed Cited "see" Anderson Banks v. Iron Hustler Corp.
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vanskike v. ACF Industries, Inc., 665 F.2d 188, 195 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982); Capasso v. Minster Machine Co., Inc., 532 F.2d 952 (3d Cir.1976); Smith v. Verson Allsteel Press Co., 74 Ill.App.3d 818 , 30 Ill.Dec. 562 , 393 N.E.2d 598 (1979). *434 Thus, whether viewed in the context of a superseding cause or under any of the other standards employed to define “substantial change in condition” under § 402A, the issue as to both the negligence and strict liability counts was one for the jury.
discussed Cited "see" Jay William Denniston v. Burlington Northern, Inc., Doing Business as Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Corporation (2×)
8th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vanskike v. AGF Industries, Inc., 665 F.2d 188 , 206 (8th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Karl Green v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company
10th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Vanskike v. ACF Indus., Inc., 665 F.2d 188 , 200 (8th Cir.1981) (applying Eichel rule that in FELA actions, “collateral source payments are inadmissible as bearing on the extent or duration of disability,” and upholding district court's ruling that evidence of social security and pension disability payments were inadmissible as was fact that plaintiff would not accept employment that paid less than those benefits), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982). 6 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kenneth G. Geimer v. Samuel T. Pastrovich, Jr., Samuel T. Pastrovich, III (2×)
8th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Vanskike v. ACF Indus., Inc., 665 F.2d 188 , 209 (8th Cir.1981) ("[a]rgument of counsel is a procedural question to be determined by federal law."), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982). 17 Johnson v. Richardson, 701 F.2d 753 (8th Cir.1983), without engaging in detailed analysis of the question or citing the earlier three cases we have referred to above, applied Missouri law to the question of what may be permissibly argued in closing, id. at 757 , as did Campbell v. Coleman Co., 786 F.2d 892, 897-98 (8th Cir.1986).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Kirwan
S.D.W. Va · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, In re John Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1079-80 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Curtis Porter v. C.A. Dawson & Company
8th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Aronson’s Men’s Stores, Inc. v. Potter Electric Signal Co., Inc., 632 S.W.2d 472 , 473 n. 2 (Mo.1982) (en banc); see also Vanskike v. ACF Industries, Inc., 665 F.2d 188, 203 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
v.
Vanskike
No. 81-1294.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 1982.
455 U.S. 1000
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.