Baxter v. Mouzavires, 455 U.S. 1006 (1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Baxter v. Mouzavires, 455 U.S. 1006 (1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1994 · …the act is based on the fundamental assumption that it is in the indian child's best interests that its relationship to the tribe be protected. ⚠ not in text
314 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 68 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People in Interest of JLP (coloctapp, 1994-02-10) · Strongest negative: Donald Lee Noggle v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt. (ca6, 1983-05-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Donald Lee Noggle v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt. (2×)
6th Cir. · 1983 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see, Granviel v. Estelle, 655 F.2d 673, 679-83 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); United States ex rel.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) People in Interest of JLP
Colo. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the act is based on the fundamental assumption that it is in the indian child's best interests that its relationship to the tribe be protected.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) People ex rel. J.L.P.
Colo. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the act is based on the fundamental assumption that it is in the indian child's best interests that its relationship to the tribe be protected.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Bank of Cape Verde v. Bronson
D.D.C. · 1994 · confidence medium
Ct. 1643, 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Rosenberg v. Coqui, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1985 · confidence medium
Baxter v. Mouzavires, 455 U.S. at 1006, 102 S.Ct. at 1643 [71 L.Ed.2d at 875 (1982)]; In-Flight Devices Corp., 466 F.2d at 232 ; Currie, supra, at 574-77.
examined Cited as authority (rule) Anton J. Miller v. The Washington State Bar Association (4×) also: Cited "see"
9th Cir. · 1982 · confidence medium
J., dissenting from admission of applicant); In re Admission of Rose, id. at 3714 (Stevens, J., concurring); id.
cited Cited "see" Houlahan v. Brown
D.D.C. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. (citing Mouzavires v. Baxter, 434 A.2d 988 (D.C.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 1643 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 ).
cited Cited "see" Overseas Partners, Inc. v. Progen Musavirlik Ve Yonetim Hizmetleri, Ltd. Sikerti
D.D.C. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Schwartz, 938 F.Supp. at 5 (citing Mouzavires v. Baxter, 434 A.2d 988, 992 (D.C.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 1643 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982)).
cited Cited "see" Celotex Corp. v. AIU Insurance Co. (In Re Celotex Corp.)
Bankr. M.D. Fla. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am. 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981) cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1645 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, Ltee. v. American Home Assur.
discussed Cited "see" Yavapai-Apache Tribe v. Mejia (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Tex. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
cited Cited "see" CNA Lloyds of Texas v. St. Paul Insurance Co.
Tex. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Cory. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1042 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 1645, 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
Minn. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1047-49 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1645 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982), reh'g denied, 456 U.S. 951 , 102 S.Ct. 2024 , 72 L.Ed.2d 476 (1982). 5 .
discussed Cited "see" Gulf Chemical & Metallurgical Corp. v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.
5th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1050-52 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 -45, 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); id. at 1058 (Wald, J., concurring); Budd Co. v. Travelers Indem.
discussed Cited "see" American Red Cross v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
D.D.C. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1041 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 reh’g denied, 456 U.S. 951 , 102 S.Ct. 2024 , 72 L.Ed.2d 476 (1982); Owens-Illinois, 597 F.Supp. at 1522 . 4 In determining the “objectively reasonable” reading of the policy, the Court must give effect to the policy’s dominant purpose of indemnity.
cited Cited "see" Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
D.N.J. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1041 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" John Edmond v. United States Postal Service General Counsel (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mouzavires v. Baxter, 434 A.2d 988, 991 (D.C.1981) (en banc) (per curiam) (expressly reserving the latter question), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 1643 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Trerotola v. Cotter (2×)
D.C. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
“A court may properly assert personal jurisdiction over a nonresident [1] where a statute authorizes service of process and [2] where such service is consistent with due process.” Smith v. Jenkins, 452 A.2d 333, 336 (D.C.1982); see Mouzavires v. Baxter, 434 A.2d 988, 990 (D.C.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 1643 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
cited Cited "see" North East Insurance v. Northern Brokerage Co.
D. Maryland · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of No. America, 667 F.2d 1034 , 1040 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 . 2 .
discussed Cited "see" Mueller v. Healthplus, Inc.
D.C. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North Am., 215 U.S.App.D.C. 156, 165 , 667 F.2d 1034 , 1043 (1981) (where lack of clarity in insurance contract, applying general principles interpreting contract in favor of the insured under contingent event vested right the *440 ory), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982). 2 .
discussed Cited "see" Elmer M. Kunkel, William H. Dennler, John D. Lockton, Ted B. Westfall and William D. Robertson v. Continental Casualty Company
10th Cir. · 1989 · signal: accord · confidence high
We explained: “The contingent nature of the right or obligation in controversy will not bar a litigant from seeking declaratory relief when the circumstances reveal a need for a present adjudication.” Id. at 594; accord Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1039-40 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Commercial Union Insurance
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981) (asbestosis), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); Insurance Co. of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., 633 F.2d 1212 (6th Cir.1980) (asbestosis), modified on rehearing, 657 F.2d 814 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 686 , 70 L.Ed.2d 650 (1981); Porter v. American Optical Corp., 641 F.2d 1128 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 686 , 70 L.Ed.2d 650 (1981) (asbestosis); Eli Lilly & Co. v. Home Insurance Co., 482 N.E.2d 467 (Ind.1985) (DES…
cited Cited "see" Commercial Union Insurance v. Sepco Corp.
11th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1047 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
cited Cited "see" Commercial Union Insurance Co., Counter-Claim-Defendant v. Sepco Corp., Counter-Claim-Plaintiff, Third-Party v. United National Insurance Co., Third-Party
3rd Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1047 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Acands, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and the Travelers Indemnity Company and the Travelers Insurance Company v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc
3rd Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Company of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1043-44 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982). 19 The phrase "bodily injury" has also been interpreted by four courts of appeals in this very context, i.e., on the issue of trigger of coverage under comprehensive general liability policies in asbestos-related personal injury actions.
cited Cited "see" ACandS, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
3rd Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Company of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1043-44 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
cited Cited "see" Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
D.D.C. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mouzavires v. Baxter, 434 A.2d 988, 997 (D.C.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 1643 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
cited Cited "see" Western Exterminating Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
D.C. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See, id. at 215 U.S.App.D.C. at 163-64 , 667 F.2d at 1041-42 .
discussed Cited "see" Electro-Catheter Corp. v. Surgical Specialties Instrument Co.
D.N.J. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mouzavires v. Baxter, 434 A.2d 988 (D.C.App.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 1643 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); Chelsea House Publishers v. Nicholstone Book Bindery, Inc., 621 S.W.2d 560 (Tenn.S.C.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 1623 , 71 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982); Lakeside Bridge & Steel Co. v. Mountain State Construction Co., 597 F.2d 596 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1087 , 63 L.Ed.2d 325 (1980); Iowa Electric Light and Power Company v. Atlas Corp., 603 F.2d 1301 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 1090 , 63 L.Ed.2d 327 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" Sanchez v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. (2×)
Colo. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Company of North America, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); Puritan Life Insurance Co. v. Guess, 598 P.2d 900 (Alaska 1979).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Johns-Manville Corp. (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034 , 1038 n. 3 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
cited Cited "see" Emons Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
S.D.N.Y. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 513 F.Supp. 47, 49 (D.D.C.), rev’d, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982). 9 .
cited Cited "see" Gaf Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America
D.D.C. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See, generally, Keene Corporation v. Insurance Co. of North America, 513 F.Supp. 47 , on appeal, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981) cert. denied 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982). .
cited Cited "see" Blannie S. Wilson, Administratrix of the Estate of Henry J. Wilson, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation
D.C. Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1040 n.9 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); I.
discussed Cited "see" ACandS, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
E.D. Pa. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981), cer t. denied,-U.S.---, 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982), rehearing denied, -U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2023 , 72 L.Ed.2d 476 (1982); Porter v. American Optical Co., 641 F.2d 1128 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, sub nom.
discussed Cited "see" APPALACHIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant
3rd Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keene v. Insurance Co. of N. America, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981), petition for cert. filed, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1981); Porter v. American Optical Corp., 641 F.2d 1128 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 686 , 70 L.Ed.2d 650 (1981); Insurance Co. of N. America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., 633 F.2d 1212 (6th Cir. 1980), aff'd on rehearing, 657 F.2d 814 (1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 686 , 70 L.Ed.2d 650 (1981).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Eric T. v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc.
D.C. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Mouzavires v. Baxter, 434 A.2d 988, 990-91 (D.C.1981) (en banc) (per curiam), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 1643 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982). 20 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Koppers Company, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Zurich Insurance Company the Travelers Indemnity Co. The American Home Assurance Company Commercial Union Insurance Company the Home Insurance Company Underwriter's at Lloyd's of London. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Certain Insurance Companies in the London Market, Referred to in This Action as \Jackson and Companies\"
unknown court · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1047-50 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 1645, 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); Dayton Indep.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Koppers Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
3rd Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am,., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1047-50 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 1645, 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); Dayton Indep.
cited Cited "see, e.g." International Union of Electrical, Salaried, Machine, & Furniture Workers v. Taylor
D.C. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Mouzavires v. Baxter, 434 A.2d 988, 992 (D.C.1981) (en banc) (describing “two-step process”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 1643 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.
Minn. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 1411 ; see also Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1048 (D.C.Cir.1981) (“There is nothing in the policies that provides for a reduction of the insurer’s liability if an injury occurs only in part during a policy period”) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Doctors' Co. v. Insurance Corp. of America
Wyo. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Transamerica Insurance Company v. Ronald M. South, Roy W. Brunsmann, Walter E. Jones, Kathleen Jones, and Iris L. Hannon
7th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1040 (D.C.Cir.1981) (upholding declaratory judgment regarding duty to defend and indemnify in cases not yet filed), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); ACandS, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Associated Indemnity Corporation v. Fairchild Industries
1st Cir. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Indeed, litigation over insurance coverage has become the paradigm for asserting jurisdiction despite "future contingencies that will determine whether a controversy ever actually becomes real." 10A Wright & Miller, supra, at 586; see, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1039-40 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); ACandS, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 666 F.2d 819, 822-23 (3d Cir.1981); see also G.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Indeed, litigation over insurance coverage has become the paradigm for asserting jurisdiction despite “future contingencies that will determine whether a controversy ever actually becomes real.” 10A Wright & Miller, supra, at 586; see, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1039-40 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); ACandS, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 666 F.2d 819, 822-23 (3d Cir.1981); see also G.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)
S.D.N.Y. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Insurance Co. of North America v. Forty Eight Insulations, Inc., 657 F.2d 814, 816 (6th Cir.) (trigger for insurance coverage exposure because ‘bodily injury’ occurs when asbestos victims first starts breathing asbestos fibers), cert denied, 454 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 686 , 70 L.Ed.2d 650 (1981); see also Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1047 (D.C.Cir.1981) (term “bodily injury” in comprehensive liability policies means “any part of the single injurious process that asbestos-related disease entails”), cer t. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 7…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Carey Canada, Inc. v. California Union Insurance
D.D.C. · 1990 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1047 (D.C.Cir.1981), cer t. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982) (continuous trigger applies because bodily injury caused by asbestos begins with inhalation of fibers and ends with manifestation); accord Phase V-A Decision, supra, at 15 (“The continuous trigger adopted ... in the bodily injury cases was based upon a finding that bodily injury from asbestos exposure was a continuous process beginning with first exposure.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
W.D. Mich. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1051-52 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., 451 F.Supp. 1230 (E.D.Mich.1978), aff'd, 633 F.2d 1212 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 686 , 70 L.Ed.2d 650 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
E.D. Pa. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Company of North America, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982) (asbestos-related diseases); Lac D’Amiante Du Quebec v. American Home Insurance, 613 F.Supp. 1549 (D.N.J.1985) (asbestos-related diseases); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. *768 Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 597 F.Supp. 1515 (D.D.C.1984); Vale, supra, (DES-related diseases).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Monsanto Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Del. Super. Ct. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, D.C.Cir., 667 F.2d 1034, 1041 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Continental Insurance Companies v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.
8th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1047 (D.C.Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982) (Date of occurrence is the continuous period from exposure to manifestation.). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Baxter
v.
Mouzavires
No. 81-899.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 1982.
455 U.S. 1006
Powell, White, Whom.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: Colorado Court of Appeals (2)

Lead Opinion

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.

Dissent

Justice White, with whom Justice Powell joins,

dissenting.

In this ease, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals concluded that the Due Process Clause permitted the trial court to exercise personal jurisdiction over petitioners, members of a Florida law firm, on the basis of an agreement with respondent, a District of Columbia patent attorney, to assist them in defending a suit filed against one of their clients in a Federal District Court in Florida. The Court of Appeals acknowledged that under Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U. S. 235, 253 (1958), “it is essential in each case that there be some act by which the defendant purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State, thus invoking the benefits and protections of its laws.” It concluded, however, that, by voluntarily entering into a contractual arrangement with a forum plaintiff, defendant satisfied this standard. The opinion equated the defendant law firm’s entering this contract with the solicitation of business by the defendant insurance company in McGee v. International Life Ins. Co., 355 U. S. 220 (1957).

The standard of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals would permit a District of Columbia merchant who, in response to a telephone order, sends merchandise to Florida, to sue for the price in the District of Columbia. As I wrote in dissenting from denial of certiorari in Chelsea House Publishers v. Nicholstone Book Bindery, ante, p. 994, and in Lakeside Bridge & Steel Co. v. Mountain State Construction Co., 445 U. S. 907 (1980), the disarray among federal and state courts on the issue of minimal contacts based on contractual dealings continues unabated. This case, which involves services instead of goods, further demonstrates that[*1007] this Court should address the issue. I dissent from the denial of certiorari.