green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Paul Gluck and Ina Gluck v. United States of America, Sidney Stein Stein & Stein Stein's Foot Specialties, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
panel of this court cannot overrule a prior panel precedent.... to the extent that is inconsistent with must be deemed without effect.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Rene Ex Rel. Rene v. Reed
Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers’, 657 F.2d 890 , 895 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 5.Ct. 1710, 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982). 6 The *817 representative plaintiffs have the burden to show that all the requirements for class certification have been met.
discussed
Cited "see"
Senecal v. B.G. Lenders Service LLC
See Johnson, 931 F.2d at 209 (citing Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers’ Local Union No. 130, 657 F.2d 890, 905-06 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coleman Vital v. Interfaith Medical Center and Local 1199
See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) (limiting aggrieved party’s right to sue to “the respondent named in the charge”). “[T]he charge serves to notify the charged party of the alleged violation and also brings the party before the EEOC, making possible effectuation of the Act’s primary goal of securing voluntary compliance with its mandates.” Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers’ Local Union No. 130, 657 F.2d 890, 905 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
East Cape May Associates v. State
See Jentgen v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 527 , 657 F.2d 1210 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1711 , 72 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
33 Fair empl.prac.cas. 461, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,913 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Children's Hospital Medical Center of Northern California
Cudahy Packing Co. v. NLRB, 117 F.2d 692, 694 (10th Cir.1941); Hamilton v. NLRB, 177 F.2d 676, 677 (9th Cir.1949); NLRB v. Daniel Construction Co., 418 F.2d 790, 791 (4th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1039 , 90 S.Ct. 1358 , 25 L.Ed.2d 649 (1970); NLRB v. Frederick Cowan and Company, 522 F.2d 26, 28 (2d Cir.1975); NLRB v. Dutch Boy, Inc., Glow Lite Division, 606 F.2d 929, 933 (10th Cir.1979); NLRB v. Interstate Dress Carriers, Inc., 610 F.2d 99 , 112 (3d Cir.1979); see NLRB v. International Medication Systems, Ltd., 640 F.2d 1110 , 1114 & n. 2 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cudahy Packing Co. v. NLRB, 117 F.2d 692, 694 (10th Cir. 1941); Hamilton v. NLRB, 177 F.2d 676 , 677 (9th Cir.1949); NLRB v. Daniel Construction Co., 418 F.2d 790, 791 (4th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1039 , 90 S.Ct. 1358 , 25 L.Ed.2d 649 (1970); NLRB v. Frederick Cowan and Company, 522 F.2d 26, 28 (2d Cir.1975); NLRB v. Dutch Boy, Inc., Glow Lite Division, 606 F.2d 929 , 933 (10th Cir.1979); NLRB v. Interstate Dress Carriers, Inc., 610 F.2d 99 , 112 (3d Cir.1979); see NLRB v. International Medication Systems, Ltd., 640 F.2d 1110 , 1114 & n. 2 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 101…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Vista Del Sol Health Services, Inc.
“If this test is met, then the subpoena must be enforced unless the responding party can prove that the inquiry is unreasonable because it is unduly burdensome or overly broad.” Id.; see also N.L.R.B. v. International Medication Systems, 640 F.2d 1110, 1114 (9th Cir.1981) (“[I]f the investigation is legitimate, the subpoenas is not needlessly broad, and the records sought are relevant to the inquiry,” the subpoena should be enforced), cert. denied 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Evergreen Trading, LLC ex rel. GN Investments, LLC v. United States
Moreover, as RCFC 26(b)(1) further emphasizes, relevant information for purposes of discovery is information “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1470 (9th Cir.1992); see also Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers’ Local Union, 657 F.2d 890 , 903 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982); JZ Buckingham Investments, LLC v. United States, 78 Fed.Cl. 15, 19 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Karam v. State
See, e.g., Jentgen v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 527 , 657 F.2d 1210 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1711 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982); Deltona Corp. v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 476 , 657 F.2d 1184 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Zealy v. City of Waukesha, 201 Wis.2d 365 , 548 N.W.2A 528 (1996).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Lazy Oil, Co. v. Witco Corp.
(3×)
See Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers Local Union No. 130, U.A., 657 F.2d 890, 896 (7th Cir.1981) (“a favorable class determination by the court- is not cast in stone”), cert. denied by Chicago Journeymen Plumbers’ Local Union No. 130, U.A. v. Plummer, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982), and cert. denied by Joint Apprenticeship Committee Local No. 130, U.A. v. Eggleston, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982), and cert. denied by Plumbing Contractors Ass’n of Chicago & Cook County v. Plummer, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (19…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Scannell v. Bel Air Police Department
See Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers’ Local 130, 657 F.2d 890 , 905-06 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982); Glus v. G.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crosten v. Kamauf
See, e.g., Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers’ local Union No. 130, 657 F.2d 890 (7th Cir.1981) (noting "[c]omplainants often file EEOC charges without the assistance of counsel and are not versed either in the technicalities of pleading or the jurisdictional requirements of the Act itself.”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Domestic Air Transportation Antitrust Litigation
See also Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers Local Union No. ISO, 657 F.2d 890 , 896 (7th Cir.1981) (“a favorable class determination by the court is not cast in stone”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stephenson v. CNA Financial Corp.
Noha, Tisch, Chookaszian, Igleski, and Demytrasz now contend that Stephenson cannot maintain a Title VII action against them because they were not named in Stephenson’s EEOC charge, as required by 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(l); see also Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers’ Local Union No. 130, 657 F.2d 890, 905 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ciampitti v. United States
Id. at 490 , 657 F.2d at 1192 ; see also Jentgen v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 527, 533 , 657 F.2d 1210, 1213-14 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1711 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rabouin v. Colorado Department of Law
See Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers’ Local Union No. 130, 657 F.2d 890, 907 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982); Arenas, 619 F.Supp. at 1308 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gould Investors, L.P. v. General Insurance
See also Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers’ Local Union No. 130, U.A., 657 F.2d 890 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Talley v. Leo J. Shapiro & Associates, Inc.
See also Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers’ Local Union No. 130, 657 F.2d 890, 895 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982); Weathers v. Peters Realty Corporation, 499 F.2d 1197, 1200 (6th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Orion Corporation v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Jentgen v. United States, 657 F.2d 1210 (Ct. Cl. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 , 102 S.Ct. 1711 (1982); Deltona Corp. v. United States, 657 F.2d 1184 (Ct. Cl. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 (1982); Zabel v. Tabb, 430 F.2d 199 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 910 , 27 L.Ed.2d 808 , 91 S.Ct. 873 (1971). [3] The Skagit County Shoreline Management Master Program defines aquaculture as "the farming or culture of food fish, shell fish, or other aquatic plants and animals in fresh or salt water areas, and may require develop…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mall Properties, Inc. v. Marsh
See also Jentgen v. United States, 657 F.2d 1210, 1211-12 , 228 Cl.Ct. 527 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1711 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ferleger v. First American Mortgage Co.
See, e.g., Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers Local Union No. 130, 657 F.2d 890, 895 (7th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J.D. Marshall International, Inc. v. Redstart, Inc.
See, e.g., Coates v. Johnson & Johnson, 85 F.R.D. 731, 733 (N.D.Ill.1980); Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(c) (“Evidence objected to shall be taken subject to the objections.”); see also Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers’ Local Union No. 130, 657 F.2d 890, 902-04 (7th Cir.1981) (wholesale refusals to answer are improper but refusing to answer irrelevant questions that “unnecessarily touch sensitive areas or go beyond reasonable *838 limits” may be justified), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lapenna v. Upjohn Co.
See Eggleon v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers’ Local Union, 657 F.2d 890 , 902 (7th Cir. 181), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 110 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982); Preyer v. United States Lines, Inc., 64 F.R.D. 430 C.D.Pa.1973), aff'd, 546 F.2d 418 (3d Cir. 976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Zewde v. Elgin Community College
See Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers, 657 F.2d 890 , 905 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dickey v. Greene
See, e.g., Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers' Local Union No. 130, 657 F.2d 890 , 905 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982); Romero v. Union Pacific Railroad, 615 F.2d 1303, 1311-12 (10th Cir. 1980); Shehadeh v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Company, supra, 595 F.2d at 728 ; Glus v. G.C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Oxman v. WLS-TV
See, e.g., Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers, 657 F.2d 890 , 895 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Medina v. Spotnail, Inc.
See Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers’ Local Union No. 130, 657 F.2d 890, 905 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Industrial Gas Antitrust Litigation
See, e.g., Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers, 657 F.2d 890 , 895 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 502, 31 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,467 Jesus Gonzalez-Aller Balseyro v. Gte Lenkurt, Inc., and General Telephone & Electronics Corporation, Defendants
In Romero, we recognized that an exception to the naming requirement of 2000e-5(f)(1) may be appropriate 16 "where the defendant was informally referred to in the body of the charge, or where there is sufficient identity of interest between the respondent and the defendant to satisfy the intention of Title VII that the defendant have notice of the charge and the EEOC have an opportunity to attempt conciliation." 17 Id. (citations omitted); see also Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers Local Union No. 130, 657 F.2d 890, 905-06 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 7…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Balseyro v. GTE Lenkurt, Inc.
In Romero , we recognized that an exception to the naming requirement of 2000e-5(f)(l) may be appropriate “where the defendant was informally re-r ferred to in the body of the charge, or where there is sufficient identity of interest between the respondent and the defendant to satisfy the intention of Title VII that the defendant have notice of the charge and the EEOC have an opportunity to attempt conciliation.” Id. (citations omitted); see also Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers Local Union No. 130, 657 F.2d 890, 905-06 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jeter v. Boswell
See e.g., Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers, 657 F.2d 890 (7th Cir.1981) ce rt. denied 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Salpeter
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-1110.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.