green
Positive treatment
8.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 42 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Lintzenich v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 536 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Palm Beach Isles Associates v. United States
See Deltona Corp. v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 476 , 657 F.2d 1184, 1187 (Ct.Cl.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maxey & Co., Pc
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 535-37 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982) (holding that Government need only present affidavit of agent involved in investigation to satisfy prima facie case); see also, Conner v. United States, 947 F.Supp. 1267, 1270 (N.D.Ind.1996) (Judge Lee addressing merits of IRS summons under 26 U.S.C. § 7609 (b)).
cited
Cited "see"
Linde Thomson Langworthy Kohn & Van Dyke, P.C. v. Resolution Trust Corporation
See id. (citing United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 533 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lorain NAACP v. Lorain Board of Education
See, Reed v. Rhodes, 422 F.Supp. 708 , (N.D.Ohio 1976), modified, 607 F.2d 714 (1979) cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Columbus Board of Ed. v. Penick, 443 U.S. 449 , 99 S.Ct. 2941 , 61 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979); Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 443 U.S. 526 , 99 S.Ct. 2971 , 61 L.Ed.2d 720 (1979); Bronson v. Bd. of Ed. of Cincinnati, 604 F.Supp. 68 (S.D.Ohio 1948). 19 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Jensen v. United States
See Deltona Corp. v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 476, 488 , 657 F.2d 1184, 1191 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Omnia Commercial Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 502 , 43 S.Ct. 437 , 67 L.Ed. 773 (1923).
discussed
Cited "see"
Philip George Stuart, Sr. v. United States of America, Mons Kapoor v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 535-36 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
S. Thomas Burnett v. Thomas R. Kindt
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 534 (7th Cir.1981) (“a contempt citation may ... be the only means of gaining review when a question would otherwise become moot”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America v. Kemper Money Market Fund, Inc., and Robert L. Wenz & Merrick Consultants, Ltd., Intervening
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc.
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982). 16 The phone calls to the merchants hurt Drinkwine but were in the merchants' interest.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dolphin Tours, Inc. v. Pacifico Creative Service, Inc.
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1261-62 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982) (where plaintiff had to make fourteen percent market share to *1511 make a profit, failure to account for defendant’s “competitive reaction” in estimating market share was a causation issue because plaintiff could not establish any injury without establishing that it would have achieved the fourteen percent market share).
cited
Cited "see"
Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc.
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paul Gluck and Ina Gluck v. United States of America, Sidney Stein Stein & Stein Stein's Foot Specialties, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 532-35 (7th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); United States v. Patmon, 630 F.2d 458, 459 (6th Cir.1980); United States v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 623 F.2d 720, 722 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980); United States v. Deak-Perera Banking Corp., 610 F.2d 89 (2d Cir.1979); United States v. First National Bank, 587 F.2d 909, 910 (8th Cir.1978); Barney v. United States, 568 F.2d 116, 117 (8th Cir.1978); Kurshan v. Riley, 484 F.2d 952 (4th Cir. 1973); United States v. L…
cited
Cited "see"
Hethcote v. United States
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. First Family Mortgage Corp.
Accord United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 532-35 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982) (compliance with handwriting exemplars moots appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. First Family Mortgage Corp.
Accord United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 532-35 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982) (compliance with handwriting exemplars moots appeal). 8 In Arthur Andersen & Co., 623 F.2d 720 , for example, the IRS served summons on Arthur Andersen, as tax advisor, during an IRS investigation of the taxpayer.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bronson v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF CINCINNATI
See, Reed v. Rhodes, 500 F.Supp. 404 (N.D.Ohio 1980), aff'd, 662 F.2d 1219 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Penick v. Board of Education, 519 F.Supp. 925 (S.D.Ohio 1981), aff'd, 663 F.2d 24 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pike Industries, Inc.
Accord, United States v. Cargo Service Stations, 657 F.2d 676, 681 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); United States v. Brighton Building and Maintenance Corp., 598 F.2d 1101, 1106 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 840 , 100 S.Ct. 79 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979); United States v. Portsmouth Paving Corp., 694 F.2d 312, 316-17 (4th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robinson
See Deltona Corp. v. United States, 657 F.2d 1184, 1193 (Ct.Cl.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982). 22.
cited
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
Accord, Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1260-63 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
Accord, Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1260-63 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Business Systems, a California Corporation v. North American Philips Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Philips Business Systems, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and N v. Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken, a Nederland Corporation, North American Philips Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Counterclaim v. General Business Systems, a California Corporation Shasta General Systems, a California Corporation, Counterclaim
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co., 467 F.Supp. 841, 859 (N.D.Cal.1979), aff'd, 658 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982). 64 The relationship between GBS and Shasta does not fall clearly at either of these extremes.
discussed
Cited "see"
General Business Systems v. North American Philips Corp.
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co., 467 F.Supp. 841, 859 (N.D.Cal. 1979), aff’d, 658 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
See United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, Salkin v. United States, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); United States v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 623 F.2d 720 , 725 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 588 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980); Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Marshall, 610 F.2d 1128 (3d Cir. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronwin v. State Bar of Arizona
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1260 (9th Cir. 1981) (special solicitude for proof of damages when defendant's conduct has been a factor in speculative nature of damages), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982) 10 28 U.S.C. § 144 provides: Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but another judge shall be …
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronwin v. State Bar
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1260 (9th Cir. 1981) (special solicitude for proof of damages when defendant’s conduct has been a factor in speculative nature of damages), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982). . 28 U.S.C. § 144 provides: Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but another judge shall be ass…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Gettysburg v. United States
Id.; see also Deltona Corp. v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 476 , 657 F.2d 1184, 1185 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Good v. United States
Penn Central, 438 U.S. at 137 , 98 S.Ct. at 2666 ; see also Deltona Corp. v. United States, 657 F.2d 1184 , 1192 n. 14, 228 Ct.Cl. 476 , 490 n. 14 (1981) (TDRs considered in evaluating the economic impact of the regulation), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Gardner v. New Jersey Pinelands Comm’n, 125 N.J. 193 , 593 A.2d 251, 261 (1991) (upholding development restrictions against takings challenge based, in part, on availability of TDRs); J.T.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People Who Care v. Rockford Bd. of Educ.
See, e.g., Reed v. Rhodes, 455 F.Supp. 546 (N.D.Oh.1978), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 607 F.2d 714 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pride Communications Ltd. Partnership v. WCKG, Inc.
See, e.g., Reed v. Rhodes, 455 F.Supp. 546 (N.D.Oh.1978), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 607 F.2d 714 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Church Of World Peace
As we recognized in Trails End Motel, taxpayers who have complied with a summons "may adequately protect their asserted interest by challenging the IRS procedure if and when the government attempts to make further use of the information obtained by the summonses." Trails End Motel, 657 F.2d at 1170 ; see also United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 533 (7th Cir.1981) (noting the "well-established rule that questions of suppression should not be considered until the time when the Government seeks to use that evidence."), cert. denied sub nom, Salkin v. United States, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Church of World Peace
As we recognized in Trails End Motel, taxpayers who have complied with a summons “may adequately protect their asserted interest by challenging the IRS procedure if and when the government attempts to make further use of the information obtained by the summonses.” Trails End Motel, 657 F.2d at 1170 ; see also United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 533 (7th Cir.1981) (noting the “well-established rule that questions of suppression should not be considered until the time when the Government seeks to use that evidence.”), cert. denied sub nom, Salkin v. United States, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.C…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Atlas Corp. v. United States
See, e.g., Deltona Corp. v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 476 , 657 F.2d 1184 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Emmett Adolph, Sr. v. Federal Emergency Management Agency of the United States
Compare id. at 1191-93 with Nollan, 107 S.Ct. at 3147, and First English, 107 S.Ct. at 2382 ff. 9 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Allied-General Nuclear Services v. United States
See, e.g., Deltona Corp. v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 476 , 657 F.2d 1184 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alvarado Morales v. Digital Equipment Corp.
See, e.g., Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co., 467 F.Supp. 841 (N.D.Cal.1979), aff 'd, 658 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Beckwith, 617 F.Supp. at 189.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pace Resources, Inc. v. Shrewsbury Township
Compare American Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. County of Marin, 653 F.2d 364 (9th Cir.1981) with Jentgen v. United States, 657 U.S. 1210 (Ct.Cl.1981) and Deltona Corp. v. United States, 657 F.2d 1184 (Ct.Cl.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pace Resources, Inc. v. Shrewsbury Township
Compare American Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. County of Marin, 653 F.2d 364 (9th Cir.1981) with Jentgen v. United States, 657 U.S. 1210 (Ct.Cl.1981) and Deltona Corp. v. United States, 657 F.2d 1184 (Ct.Cl.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982) 7 In 1982, the legislature extended the sheltered time period to five years. 53 P.S.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Segmond v. United States
United States v. Garden State Nat'l Bank, 607 F.2d 61, 68 (3d Cir.1979); see also United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 536 (7th Cir.1981) (“no more than [an affidavit] is necessary”), cert. denied sub nom Salkin v. United States, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mutschler & Associates
See, e.g., United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 538 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1037-1038 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981); United States v. First National State Bank, 616 F.2d 668, 674 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John G. Mutschler & Associates, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526, 538 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1037-1038 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981); United States v. First National State Bank, 616 F.2d 668, 674 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 2987 , 64 L.Ed.2d 854 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
(2×)
See also Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Van Dyk Research Corp. v. Xerox Corp., 631 F.2d 251, 255 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Deltona Corp.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-1207.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1982.
Published
Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.