green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.3 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“An insufficient warrant cannot be cured by the most detailed affidavit”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“No one circumstance is talismanic to the Rakas inquiry.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[wjhile residence may often be an important consideration, it is not talismanic”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Shugart
an insufficient warrant cannot be cured by the most detailed affidavit
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Haqq
no one circumstance is talismanic to the rakas inquiry.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gerena
wjhile residence may often be an important consideration, it is not talismanic
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Nash v. Consolidated City of Jacksonville
See, e.g., Black Law Enforcement Officers Ass’n v. City of Akron, 824 F.2d 475, 480-81 (6th Cir.1987); Davis v. City of Dallas, 111 F.2d 205, 209-10 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1116 , 106 S.Ct. 1972 , 90 L.Ed.2d 656 (1986); Gillespie v. Wisconsin, 111 F.2d 1035, 1041-44 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1083 , 106 S.Ct. 854 , 88 L.Ed.2d 894 (1986); Contreras v. Los Angeles, 656 F.2d 1267 , 1280-84 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 5.Ct. 1719, 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982); Brunet v. City of Columbus, 642 F.Supp. 1214, 1246-47 (S.D.Ohio 1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Balogun
See United States v. Kendall, 665 F.2d 126, 134 (7th Cir.1981) (quotation omitted) (“[t]he test for whether a bill of particulars is necessary is ‘whether the indictment sets forth the elements of the offense charged and sufficiently apprises the defendant of the charges to enable him to prepare for trial’”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Connie Walker, Antoinette Lloyd, Ronald Jackson, Also Known as Cuzzo, Mario H. Lloyd, and Charles Lloyd
(2×)
See United States v. Kendall, 665 F.2d 126, 136 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jackson
(2×)
See United States v. Haydel, 649 F.2d 1152, 1154-55 (5th Cir. 1981), modified, 664 F.2d 84 , cert. denied, 455 U. S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982)." United States v. Torres, 705 F2d 1287, 1294 (11th Cir. 1983). [2] In the case sub judice, there is no evidence that Kendrick exercised precautions to insure the privacy or safety of Jackson's automobile, i.e., Kendrick did not request the law enforcement officers to leave her front yard; that Kendrick had a possessory interest in the searched vehicle or that she expected privacy in the passenger compartment of Jackson's automobile.
cited
Cited "see"
Knox v. Blackburn
See United States v. Hinds, 662 F.2d 362, 367, n. 9 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1720 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Reddick
See United States v. Haydel, 649 F.2d 1152 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S. Ct. 1721 , 72 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Heidecke
See United States v. Kendall, 665 F.2d 126, 134-35 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Martinez v. Oakland Scavenger Co.
Accord, Contreras v. City of Los Angeles, 656 F.2d 1267, 1280 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bailey
See United States v. Kendall, 665 F.2d 126, 134 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Chaverra-Cardona
See United States v. Kendall, 665 F.2d 126, 134-35 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Carson
See United States v. Haydel, 649 F.2d 1152 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982) (burden of proof is on petitioner in motion to suppress).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rick Serola
See United States v. Kendall, 665 F.2d 126, 134 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William M. Percival, Carolyn Allen Percival, Randy L. Middleton, Defendants
See United States v. Kendall, 665 F.2d 126, 137 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis Camden Peters v. Ray Lieuallen, Chancellor of the State Board of Higher Education and the State Board of Higher Education, State of Oregon
See Contreras v. City of Los Angeles, 656 F.2d 1267, 1272 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
36 Fair empl.prac.cas. 16, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,737 Elizabeth A. Yartzoff v. State of Oregon, Employment Division of the Department of Human Resources
See Contreras v. City of Los Angeles, 656 F.2d 1267, 1274 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982); White v. City of San Diego, 605 F.2d 455, 461 (9th Cir.1979). 5 Yartzoff argues that her proposed amendment would not have been futile because "an individual can establish a prima facie case of discrimination under disparate impact theory when he or she is adversely affected by a subjective selection criteria ...," citing Peters v. Lieuallen, 693 F.2d 966 (9th Cir.1982), and Wang v. Hoffman, 694 F.2d 1146 (9th Cir.1982). 6 Yartzoff alleges that "flexib…
discussed
Cited "see"
Yartzoff v. Oregon
See Contreras v. City of Los Angeles, 656 F.2d 1267, 1274 (9th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982); White v. City of San Diego, 605 F.2d 455, 461 (9th Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Cletus PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee
See Contreras v. City of Los Angeles, 656 F.2d 1267 (9th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas P. Shackelford
See United States v. Hinds, 662 F.2d 362 , 368 n. 13 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1720 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982); Stevens v. United States, 297 F.2d 664, 665 (10th Cir.1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Torres
See United States v. Haydel, 649 F.2d 1152, 1154-55 (5th Cir.1981), modified, 664 F.2d 84 , cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982). 5 In Haydel, an evaluation of these factors led to the conclusion that Haydel did have a legitimate expectation of privacy in the place searched, his parents’ home.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arvey Hawy Lyons and Vickie Elaine Lyons, A/K/A Vickie Colbert
See United States v. Hinds, 662 F.2d 362, 367 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1720 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William J. O'connell, United States of America v. Richard Crossman
See United States v. Hinds, 662 F.2d 362, 366 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1720 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982); United States v. Anderson, 509 F.2d 312, 331 (D.C.Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 991 , 95 S.Ct. 1427 , 43 L.Ed.2d 672 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richardson v. Lamar County Board of Education
See, e.g., Contreras v. City of Los Angeles, 656 F.2d 1267, 1271-1272 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982); Guardians Association of New York City Police Dept., Inc. v. Civil Service Commission, 630 F.2d 79, 91 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 940 , 101 S.Ct. 3083 , 69 L.Ed.2d 954 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
44 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1477, 44 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,411, 44 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,412 Black Law Enforcement Officers Association Ed Irvine Harold Craig v. The City of Akron the Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 7 Joseph P. Wheeler Sidney Foster Virgil Collins Phillip Barnes, Chief of Police
Sec. 1607.5 (1986); see also Contreras v. City of Los Angeles, 656 F.2d 1267, 1283 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Black Law Enforcement Officers Ass'n v. City of Akron
See 29 C.F.R. § 1607.5 (1986); see also Contreras v. City of Los Angeles, 656 F.2d 1267, 1283 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gray
See, e.g., United States v. Kendall, 665 F.2d 126, 131 (7th Cir.1981) (and cases cited therein), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1021 , 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
See, eg., United States v. Haydel, 649 F.2d 1152, 1154-55 (5th Cir.), corrected, 664 F.2d 84 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 (1982); Wilson v. Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County, 620 F.2d 1201, 1208-14 (7th Cir.1980); United States v. Vicknair, 610 F.2d 372, 380-81 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 823 , 101 S.Ct. 83 , 66 L.Ed.2d 25 (1980); United States v. Garcia-Rodriquez, 558 F.2d 956, 960 (9th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sadik Xheka and Beha Xheka
United States v. Santiago, 582 F.2d 1128 (7th Cir.1978); see also United States v. Kendall, 665 F.2d 126, 131 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 102 S.Ct. 1719 , 72 L.Ed.2d 140 ; United States v. Gil, 604 F.2d 546 (7th Cir.1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kendall
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-1482.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1982.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.