green
Positive treatment
8.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. William Robert Woolery
Ct. 1722, 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bradshaw v. United States
See Edwards v. United States, 430 A.2d 1321, 1332 (D.C.1981) (en banc), cert. denied 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982) (the traditional reasons for pre-trial detention, preventing flight or intimidation of witnesses, are designed to preserve the integrity of the judicial process by preventing future conduct).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kennedy v. District of Columbia
(2×)
See United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321 , 1324 n. 2 (D.C.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lynch v. United States
(2×)
"The sum of an evidentiary presentation may well be greater than its constituent parts." Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171, 180 , 107 S.Ct. 2775, 2781 , 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987). (2) In making a finding as to commission of the offense, the trial court must continue to employ the probable cause standard of Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 , 95 S.Ct. 854 , 43 L.Ed.2d 54 (1975); see United States v. Salerno, supra (noting separate requirements under federal pretrial detention statute of proof of offense by probable cause and proof of dangerousness by clear and convincing evidence). [5] (3) The …
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Palmer
See Passman v. Blackburn, 652 F.2d 559, 565-66 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S. Ct. 1722 , 72 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lynch v. United States
The trial court may consider any available information in making its decision to detain, and information presented in detention hearings is not subject to the rules concerning the admissibility of evidence in a court of law. §§ 23-1321(b), (g), 23-1322(c)(5); see United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321, 1334 (D.C.1981) (en banc) (hearsay evidence properly admissible at so-called preventive detention hearings), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Accetturo
See id. at 105 , 95 S.Ct. at 858 . 89 Thereafter, in United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321 (D.C.App.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982), the District of Columbia Court of Appeals held that the preventive detention statute enacted for the District of Columbia, the prototype for the Bail Reform Act of 1984, did not violate due process.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Godofredo Martir
Senate Report at 22, reprinted in 1984 U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News 3205; see United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321, 1334, 1338 (D.C.App.1981) (in banc) (government may proceed directly or by proffer under D.C. statute), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cocco
See U.S. v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321 (D.C.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982) for a lengthy discussion and historical background of the concepts of bail and pretrial detention, etc. Closer to home, we have the benefit of a memorandum of Judge William Caldwell of our court on the role of the district court pursuant to the review section of the Act— see U.S.A. v. Yeaple, 605 F.Supp. 85 (M.D.Pa.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Freitas
See United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321, 1330-31 (D.C.Ct.App.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hazzard
See Edwards v. United States, 430 A.2d 1321, 1332 (D.C.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Aiello
See Senate Report at 8 (citing United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321 (D.C.App.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982)).
cited
Cited "see"
Gabriel I. Penagaricano v. Orlando Llenza
See Woodard v. Marsh, 658 F.2d 989, 994 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin v. Helstad
See Woodard v. Marsh, 658 F.2d 989, 996 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982) (false response on application about existence of previous discharges from military service is relevant to leadership abilities and person’s ability to serve as an officer).
discussed
Cited "see"
Graham v. Three or More Members of the Six Member Army Reserve General Officer Selection Board of 30 November 1979
See Woodard v. Marsh, 658 F.2d 989, 998 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982), (holding that an Army Reserve commissioned officer “has no reasonable expectation of continued employment and thus no property interest protected by the due process clause.” Citing Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d 857 (5th Cir.1974) (en banc), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Graham v. 3 OR MORE MEMBERS ARMY RES. SEL. BD., ETC.
See Woodard v. Marsh, 658 F.2d 989, 998 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982), (holding that an Army Reserve commissioned officer "has no reasonable expectation of continued employment and thus no property interest protected by the due process clause." Citing Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d 857 (5th Cir.1974) (en banc), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James T. Schell
(2×)
See United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321 (D.C.App.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Eli J. Guillory v. Ross Maggio, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
See Passman v. Blackburn, 652 F.2d 559, 568 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1722 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. FERNANDO A.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321, 1336 (D.C.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982); see also Querubin v. Commonwealth, 440 Mass. 108, 118 , 795 N.E.2d 534 (2003) ("[a] full-blown evidentiary hearing that includes the right to present and cross-examine witnesses is not needed or required [at a bail proceeding]"); cf. Mendez v. Robertson, 202 Ariz. 128, 130 , 42 P.3d 14 (Ct.App.2002) (no right to evidentiary hearing on defendant's request to modify conditions of release).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyce v. Woodruff
See also Passman v. Blackburn, 652 F.2d 559, 564-65 (5th Cir.1981), cert, denied 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1722 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982) (Police radio bulletin describing a suspect in an armed robbery was insufficient to support finding of probable cause; suspect had been arrested only twenty-five minutes after the crime); United States v. LaVallee, 522 F.2d 211, 214 (2d Cir.1975) remanded on other grounds, 428 U.S. 907 , 96 S.Ct. 3215 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1213 (1976) (“While a radio bulletin may justify immediate investigation, it does not establish probable cause for an arrest and search unless fou…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. United States
(2×)
See D.C.Code § 23-1322(c)(5) (1989) (information “offered in connection with” any order detaining a defendant before trial “need not conform to the rules pertaining to the admissibility of evidence in a court of law”); see also United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321, 1334 (D.C.1981) (en banc) (information upon which court bases its ruling “need not be sworn testimony”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kleinbart v. United States
Compare United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321, 1337-38 (D.C.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982) (defendant not entitled to confront and cross-examine government witnesses under D.C. pretrial detention statute) with Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (f) (defendants shall be afforded an opportunity to present witnesses and to cross-examine government witnesses). 17 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Stevens
See, e.g., Passman v. Blackburn, 652 F.2d 559, 570 (5th Cir.1981) (“The use of a single color photograph ... with eleven other black and white mug shots ... carried an inherent suggestivity.”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1722 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982); O’Brien v. Wainwright, 738 F.2d 1139, 1140-41 (11th Cir.1984) (same), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1162 , 105 S.Ct. 918 , 83 L.Ed.2d 931 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Thompson v. United States
See, e.g., Woodard v. Marsh, 658 F.2d 989, 992-93 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Tgt
See also United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321, 1332 (D.C.1981) (en banc) (pretrial detention serves a regulatory rather than penal interest), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Salerno and Vincent Cafaro
(2×)
United States v. Portes, 786 F.2d 758 (7th Cir.1986); United States v. Accetturo, 783 F.2d 382 (3d Cir.1986); see also United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321 (D.C.App.1981) (in banc) (upholding preventive detention under District of Columbia bail statute), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982). 62 This does not, however, end the due process inquiry.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Yvonne Melendez-Carrion
See also United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321 , 1326 n. 6 (D.C.App.1981) (in banc) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Melendez-Carrion
See also United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321 , 1326 n. 6 (D.C.App.1981) (in banc) (citation omitted), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re T.G.T.
See also United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321, 1332 (D.C.1981) (en banc) (pretrial detention serves a regulatory rather than penal interest), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Faheem-El v. Klincar
I), 60 Geo.L.J. 1140 (1972); Duker, The Right to Bail: A Historical Inquiry, 42 Alb.L.Rev. 33 (1977); Mitchell, Bail Reform and the Constitutionality of Pretrial Detention, 55 Va.L.Rev. 1223 (1969); see also United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321 (D.C.App.1981) (en banc), cert. denied 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Grant C. Affleck, United States of America v. Frank Kowalik, Jr.
(2×)
Compare Escandar v. Ferguson, 441 F.Supp. 53, 58 (S.D.Fla.1977) (finding that likelihood of flight is the only constitutionally permissible justification for denial of bail) with United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321 (D.C.App.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1721 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982) (upholding the denial of bail for the purpose of protecting the community). 3 The Supreme Court has expressly reserved the question.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Lee Willie v. Ross Maggio, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
O’Bryan v. McKaskle, — U.S.--, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); see also Passman v. Blackburn, 652 F.2d 559, 567 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1722 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982); Cobb v. Wainwright, 609 F.2d 754, 756 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. Shaw v. DeRobertis
See also Passman v. Blackburn, 652 F.2d 559, 567 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1722 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronald Clark O'Bryan v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
(2×)
Id. at 645 , 94 S.Ct. at 1872 ; see also Passman v. Blackburn, 652 F.2d 559, 567 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 1722 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982); Cobb v. Wainwright, 609 F.2d 754, 756 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Craft
See, e.g., Passman v. Blackburn, 652 F.2d 559, 569-74 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. den. - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1722 , 72 L.Ed.2d 141 (1982); United States v. Rice, 652 F.2d 521, 527-28 (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. Osborne, 630 F.2d 374, 378-79 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. den. 450 U.S. 934 , 101 S.Ct. 1398 , 67 L.Ed.2d 369 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fasick
v.
Hilton, Warden, Trenton State Prison
v.
Hilton, Warden, Trenton State Prison
No. 81-5756.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1982.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.