green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Marriage of Holman
See Atkinson v. Atkinson (1981), 87 Ill. 2d 174 , cert, denied (1982), 456 U.S. 905 , 72 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Tuffli v. Board of Education
See Coulter v. Michelin Tire Corp., 622 S.W.2d 421, 437 (Mo.App.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1752 , 72 L.Ed.2d 162 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Marriage of Kondos
See Atkinson v. Atkinson (1981), 87 Ill. 2d 174 , 429 N.E.2d 465 , cert. denied (1982), 456 U.S. 905 , 72 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Cain
See, e.g., United States v. Fogg, 652 F.2d 551 , 559 *751 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 905 , 102 S.Ct. 1751 , 72 L.Ed.2d 162 (1982) (holding no Brady violation where prosecution failed to turn over grand jury testimony of individuals who were friends of defendant).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Quinn v. Quinn
See, e.g., Atkinson v. Atkinson, 87 Ill.2d 174 , 57 Ill.Dec. 567 , 429 N.E.2d 465 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 905 , 102 S.Ct. 1751 , 72 L.Ed.2d 162 (1982); Carter v. Carter, 419 A.2d 1018 (Me.1980); Ayars v. Ayars, 50 Md.App. 93 , 436 A.2d 490 (1981); Madden v. Madden, 336 Pa.Super. 552 , 486 A.2d 401 (1984); Bonnell v. Bonnell, 117 Wis.2d 241 , 344 N.W.2d 123 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bogenholm ex rel. Bogenholm v. House
See also Vulcan, Inc. v. Fordees Corp., 658 F.2d 1106, 1109 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1752 , 72 L.Ed.2d 162 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
BOGENHOLM BY BOGENHOLM v. House
See also Vulcan, Inc. v. Fordees Corp., 658 F.2d 1106, 1109 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1752 , 72 L.Ed.2d 162 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marvin P. Johnson, Robert A. Wilkins, Duane Quamina, Patricia Gordon, Mark Francis Johnson
As this court has recognized, “[a] comment on the failure of the defense, as opposed to that of the defendant, to counter or explain the testimony presented or evidence introduced is not an infringement of the defendant’s fifth amendment privilege.” Duncan v. Stynchcombe, 704 F.2d 1213, 1215-16 (11th Cir.1983) (emphasis in original); see also Unit ed States v. Fogg, 652 F.2d 551, 557 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 905 , 102 S.Ct. 1751 , 72 L.Ed.2d 162 (1982); Bright, 630 F.2d at 825 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fogg
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-1264.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 29, 1982.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.