green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
13.6 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1991 ·
…when examining a complaint, one must look solely at the allegations made and assume they are true. if a judge considers affidavits or other materials, a motion to dismiss a complaint is converted into a motion for summary judgment
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Darrel Wayne Hill, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellant/cross-Appellee
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
the record as it relates to the claim of ineffective counsel cannot be divided piecemeal when the question is whether an individual has been wrongfully convicted
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Atlantis Group, Inc. v. Rospatch Corp.
(2×)
when examining a complaint, one must look solely at the allegations made and assume they are true. if a judge considers affidavits or other materials, a motion to dismiss a complaint is converted into a motion for summary judgment
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Rospatch Securities Litigation
(2×)
when examining a complaint, one must look solely at the allegations made and assume they are true. if a judge considers affidavits or other materials, a motion to dismiss a complaint is converted into a motion for summary judgment
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Edward v. Lawrence v. Bill Armontrout
(2×)
when a man's liberty is at stake counsel owes a greater duty than to simply accept someone's hearsay statement that the witness would rather not testify.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. William J. Cintolo
United States v. Gonsalves, 668 F.2d 73, 75 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 909 , 102 g.Ct. 1759, 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982); Dente v. Riddell, Inc., 664 F.2d 1, 5 (1st Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Rudy D. Cannon v. W.C. Berry
Ct. 1759, 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982) (finding ineffective assistance of counsel when attorney failed to file direct appeal as the defendant had requested); Cantrell v. *1023 Alabama, 546 F.2d 652 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 959 , 97 S.Ct. 2687 , 53 L.Ed.2d 278 (1977) (attorney’s failure to perfect appeal by filing certified transcript was held to be ineffective assistance); Lumpkin v. Smith, 439 F.2d 1084 (5th Cir.1971) (ineffective assistance found because attorney failed to notify defendant of right to appeal and right to counsel on appeal); Sapp v. Wainwright, 433 F.2d 317 (5th Cir.1970…
examined
Cited "see"
Lien v. Class
(4×)
See Eldridge v. Atkins, 665 F.2d 228, 232 (8thCir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982): It is the duty of the lawyer to conduct a prompt investigation of the circumstances of the case and explore all avenues leading to facts relevant to guilt and degree of guilt or penalty.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jim Vanderbilt v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
See United States v. Bass, 490 F.2d 846 (5th Cir.1974) 5 563 S.W.2d at 599 n. 4 6 Vanderbilt v. State, 629 S.W.2d 709 (Tex.Crim.App.1981) (Vanderbilt II), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982) 7 451 U.S. 454 , 101 S.Ct. 1866 , 68 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981) 8 437 U.S. 1 , 98 S.Ct. 2141 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978) 9 Id. at 18 , 98 S.Ct. at 2150 10 Id. at 11 , 98 S.Ct. at 2147 11 451 U.S. 430 , 101 S.Ct. 1852 , 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981) 12 Jones v. Thigpen, 741 F.2d 805, 815 (5th Cir.1984), vacated on other grounds, 475 U.S. 1003 , 106 S.Ct. 1172 , 89 L.Ed.2d 292 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Elam v. State
See Vanderbilt v. State, 629 S.W.2d 709, 717 (Tex.Crim.App.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
Milton Rene Couch v. Myrna Trickey, Superintendent
(4×)
See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). 1 Our holding in Eldridge v. Atkins, 665 F.2d 228 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982), establishes that an attorney’s decision not to interview the prosecution’s witnesses, justified by no reasonable excuse, amounts to constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Beesley v. Hartford Fire Insurance
(2×)
See Hildebrand v. Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, 607 F.2d 705, 707 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982) (citing Dairy Queen v. Wood, 369 U.S. 469 , 82 S.Ct. 894 , 8 L.Ed.2d 44 (1962) Beacon Theatres Inc. v. Westover, 359 U.S. 500 , 79 S.Ct. 948 , 3 L.Ed.2d 988 (1959)).
examined
Cited "see"
United Transportation Union, Local 74 v. Consolidated Rail Corp., United Transportation Union
(4×)
See Hildebrand v. Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, 607 F.2d 705, 707 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982) (citing Dairy Queen v. Wood, 369 U.S. 469 , 82 S.Ct. 894 , 8 L.Ed.2d 44 (1962); Beacon Theatres Inc. v. Westover, 359 U.S. 500 , 79 S.Ct. 948 , 3 L.Ed.2d 988 (1959)). 18 The " 'legal' nature of an issue is determined by considering, first, the pre-merger custom with reference to such questions; second, the remedy sought; and, third, the practical abilities and limitations of juries." Ross, supra, at 538 n. 10, 90 S.Ct. at 738 n.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mountjoy v. Jones
(2×)
See Eldridge v. Atkins, 665 F.2d 228 (8th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matulin v. Village of Lodi
(2×)
See Hildebrand v. Board of Trustees, 662 F.2d 439, 443 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matulin v. Village of Lodi
(2×)
See Hildebrand v. Board of Trustees, 662 F.2d 439, 443 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Barker v. State
See Vanderbilt v. State, 629 S.W.2d 709, 721 (Tex.Crim.App.1981), cer t. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ranson v. State
(2×)
See Vanderbilt v. State, 629 S.W.2d 709, 721 (Tex.Cr.App.1981), cer t. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 169 (1981), and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell v. State
(2×)
See Vanderbilt v. State, 629 S.W.2d 709, 725-730 (Tex.Cr.App.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 169 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Aguirre v. State
See Vanderbilt v. State, 629 S.W.2d 709 (Tex.Crim.App. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mead v. State
(2×)
See Vanderbilt v. State, 629 S.W.2d 709 (Tex.Cr.App. 1981), cert. den. 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982); Williams v. State, 622 S.W.2d 116 (Tex.Cr.App. 1981), cert. den. 455 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 1646 , 71 L.Ed.2d 876 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Lockhart
(2×)
See, Eldridge v. Atkins, 665 F.2d 228 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodgers v. Fisher Body Division, General Motors Corp.
(2×)
Accord, Hildebrand v. Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, 662 F.2d 439 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stevenson v. State
See Murray, 804 S.W.2d at 284 ; see also Vanderbilt v. State, 629 S.W.2d 709, 724 (Tex.Crim.App.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982); Ly, 908 S.W.2d at 600 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hughes v. State
(2×)
Ex parte Woods, 745 S.W.2d 21, 26 (Tex. Crim.App.1988) (psychiatric testimony based upon hypothetical and not influenced by earlier examination was admissible); see also Vanderbilt v. State, 629 S.W.2d 709, 720 (Tex.Crim.App.1981) (psychiatrist's testimony admissible where his responses were based upon hypotheticals and "did not purport to be based upon" the evaluations conducted in violation of Smith), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Laville Hannon v. Herb Maschner and Attorney General of the State of Kansas, Respondents
See, e.g., Perez v. Wainwright, 640 F.2d 596 , 598 & n. 3 (5th Cir.1981) (citing cases), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1759 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982); Jackson v. Turner, 442 F.2d 1303, 1306-07 (10th Cir.1971); Goodwin v. Cardwell, 432 F.2d 521, 522 (6th Cir.1970); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Armontrout
(2×)
In Sumner v. Mata, 449 U.S. 539, 540 , 101 S.Ct. 764, 765 , 66 L.Ed.2d 722 (1981), the Supreme Court held that 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d) “requires deference by federal courts to factual determinations of all state courts.” However, a federal court is not barred from reviewing on collateral attack “a mixed determination of law and fact that requires the application of legal principles to the historical facts of this case.” Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 342 , 100 *924 S.Ct. 1708, 1715, 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980); see also Eldridge v. Atkins, 665 F.2d 228 , 236 n. 5 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denie…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stevenson v. State
(2×)
See also Eldridge v. Atkins, 665 F.2d 228 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982) (failure to interview witnesses when there was the possibility of a substantial defense of misidentification constituted ineffective assistance of counsel); Wilson v. Cowan, 578 F.2d 166 (6th Cir.1978) (failure to call an alibi witness who was ready and willing to testify is ineffective assistance of counsel); Halt v. State, 496 S.W.2d 300 (Mo.App.1973) (failure to investigate circumstances which may constitute a valid defense amounts to ineffective assistance of counse…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williamson v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
(2×)
See also, Hildebrand v. Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, 662 F.2d 439, 443 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bowie
(2×)
United States v. Combest, 14 M.J. 927, 932 (A.C.M.R.1982); United States v. Jones, 14 M.J. 700 (N.M.C.M.R.1982); United States v. Long, 674 F.2d 848 (11th Cir.1982); see also Eldridge v. Atkins, 665 F.2d 228 , 236 n. 5 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982) (counsel could not call alibi witness if he reasonably believed witness would not help client); United States v. Miller, 643 F.2d 713 (10th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Craig v. McDonough v. Trustees of the University System of New Hampshire
(2×)
“The problem in any case is to arrive at a balance between the interests of the teacher, as a citizen, in commenting upon matters of public concern and the interest of the State, as an employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public serv *784 ices it performs through its employees.” Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. at 568 , 88 S.Ct. at 1734 ; see also Hildebrand v. Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, 662 F.2d 439, 442-43 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982); Alicea Rosado v. Garcia Santiago, 562 F.2d 114, 117 (1st Cir.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Lowe
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Gonsalves, 668 F.2d 73 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1759 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982); United States v. Monahan, 633 F.2d 984 (1st Cir.1980); United States v. Flick, 516 F.2d 489 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 282 , 46 L.Ed.2d 260 (1975); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Association of Investment Brokers, and Anthony W. Tedeschi v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Compare Hope v. Superior Court, 122 Cal.App.3d 147 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 851 (1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 71 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982) (agreement to arbitrate under NYSE rule is a contract of adhesion and NYSE procedures fail to meet minimum levels of integrity), with Drayer v. Krasner, 572 F.2d 348 (2d Cir.) (Friendly, J.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 948 , 98 S.Ct. 2855 , 56 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978) (rejecting antitrust attack on NYSE compulsory arbitration rule and attack on fairness of NYSE arbitration procedures). 13 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Atkins, Chairman, Missouri Board of Probation and Parole
v.
Eldridge
v.
Eldridge
No. 81-1516.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 29, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (5) · W.D. Michigan (4)
C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.