green
Positive treatment
9.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Clark v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
Thus, “[o]nce [a] governor has granted extradition, a court considering release on habeas corpus can do no more than decide *395 (a) whether the extradition documents on their face are in order; (b) whether the petitioner has been charged with a crime in the demanding state; (c) whether the petitioner is the person named in the request for extradition; and (d) whether the petitioner is a fugitive.” Michigan v. Doran, supra, 439 U.S. 289 ; accord Narel v. Liburdi, 185 Conn. 562, 565 , 441 A.2d 177 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S. Ct. 1974 , 72 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Kilgore College
See Allaire v. Rogers, 658 F.2d 1055 , 1059 13 (5th Cir. Unit A Oct. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 (1982) (members of college faculty organizations requesting salary information); Goss v. San Jacinto Jr. Coll., 588 F.2d 96, 99 (5th Cir. 1979) (efforts to organize local chapter of National Faculty Association); Lewis v. Spencer, 468 F.2d 553, 557 (5th Cir. 1972) (tenure advocacy and attempts to organize chapter of National Faculty Association).
cited
Cited "see"
Ware v. Fort
See Kilcoyne v. Morgan, 664 F.2d 940, 942 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 72 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. v. Dockery
(2×)
See Terry v. Raymond International, Inc., 658 F.2d 398, 402 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1975 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982); Lapeyrouse v. Texaco, Inc., 693 F.2d 581 , 585 (5th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert P. Aguilar, United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert P. Aguilar, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See Clark v. City of Los Angeles, 650 F.2d 1033, 1039 (9th Cir.1981) ("overbreadth doctrine holds that a law is void on its face if it sweeps within its ambit not solely activity that is subject to governmental control, but also includes within its prohibition the practice of a protected constitutional right"), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aguilar
See Clark v. City of Los Angeles, 650 F.2d 1033, 1039 (9th Cir.1981) (“overbreadth doctrine holds that a law is void on its face if it sweeps within its ambit not solely activity that is subject to governmental control, but also includes within its prohibition the practice of a protected constitutional right”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Holland v. State
See United States v. DeSimone , 660 F.2d 532 , 543 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1976 , 72 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Staples v. Palten
(2×)
Gentry v. Norwalk, 196 Conn. 596, 606 , 494 A.2d 1206 (1985); see State v. Nardini, supra. “It is a cardinal rule of statutory construction that a statute is not to be construed so as to thwart its purpose.” Narel v. Liburdi, 185 Conn. 562, 571 , 441 A.2d 177 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S. Ct. 1974 , 72 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mariela Pareja
See, United States v. Vigil-Montanel, 753 F.2d 996, 999 (11th Cir.1985) ("A defendant’s intent can be inferred from his conduct and all the surrounding circumstances.”), and United States v. Arrendondo-Morales, 624 F.2d 681, 684 (5th Cir.1980) (“Because guilty knowledge is difficult to prove by direct evidence, surrounding circumstances may supply inferences of knowledge which adequately prove intent."). 14 . 739 F.2d 1520 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1008 , 105 S.Ct. 1369 , 84 L.Ed.2d 389 (1985). 15 . 660 F.2d 532 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, Butler v. United States,…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cable News Network, Inc. v. Video Monitoring Services
(2×)
See Terry v. Raymond International, Inc., 658 F.2d 398 (5th Cir.1981) (Unit A), cert. den., 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1975 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982), and Lapeyrouse v. Texaco, Inc., 693 F.2d 581 (5th Cir.1982), overturned in Point Landing, Inc. v. Omni Capital International, Ltd., 795 F.2d 415 (5th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Demar v. Open Space & Conservation Commission
(2×)
To do otherwise would thwart the statutory purpose; see Narel v. Liburdi, 185 Conn. 562, 571 , 441 A.2d 177 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S. Ct. 1974 , 72 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Clyde Simmons and Lloyd Cole v. Diamond Shamrock Corporation, A/K/A Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Company
See Quinn v. Burlington N., Inc. Pension Plan, 664 F.2d 675 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1976 , 72 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); Pabst Brewing Corp. v. Anger, 784 F.2d 338 (8th Cir.1986). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Robison v. Canterbury Village, Inc.
See Rice v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, 663 F.2d 336 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. den. 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1976 , 72 L.Ed.2d 444 ; Rheuark v. Shaw, 477 F.Supp. 897 (N.D.Tex.1979), 628 F.2d 297 (5th Cir.1980), cert. den. 450 U.S. 931 , 101 S.Ct. 1392 , 67 L.Ed.2d 365 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Prospect Hill Resources, Inc. v. Chenoweth (In Re Prospect Hill Resources, Inc.)
(2×)
See Terry v. Raymond Int’l, Inc., 658 F.2d 398, 402 (5th Cir.1981) (Unit A), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1975 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982); Beaulieu v. Electronic Business Systems, 632 F.Supp. 701 (D.Me.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Howard v. Commissioner
See Clark v. City of Los Angeles, 650 F.2d 1033 , 1037 (9th Cir. 1981) , cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982) .
discussed
Cited "see"
Stambor v. 170-SECOND COLLINS
Cleary 3d ed. 1984), and cases collected; see Clark v. City of Los Angeles, 650 F.2d 1033 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982); Sabatino v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs, 415 F.2d 632 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1057 , 90 S.Ct. 750 , 24 L.Ed.2d 752 (1970); United States v. Ware, 247 F.2d 698 (7th Cir.1957); Hartzog v. United States, 217 F.2d 706 (4th Cir.1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hogue v. Milodon Engineering, Inc.
(2×)
See Terry v. Raymond Int’l, Inc., 658 F.2d 398 (5 Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1975 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Hogue
(2×)
See Terry v. Raymond Int'l, Inc., 658 F.2d 398 (5 Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1975 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982). 7 Since we have determined that Congress authorized nationwide service of process in cases like the present one, the only remaining question is whether assertion by the bankruptcy court sitting in Virginia of jurisdiction over defendant, a California corporation, is compatible with the requirements of due process.
discussed
Cited "see"
Parks v. Bourbeau
(2×)
See Narel v. Liburdi, 185 Conn. 562 , 441 A.2d 177 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S. Ct. 1974 , 72 L.
cited
Cited "see"
William R. And Lorna E. Hall v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Clark v. City of Los Ange *635 les, 650 F.2d 1033, 1037 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
Hill v. Blake
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Commissioners’ Prefatory Note, Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, 11 U.L.A. 52-53; see Narel v. Liburdi, 185 Conn. 562, 565 , 441 A.2d 177 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S. Ct. 1974 , 72 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harvard Crimson, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College
See, e.g., Rice v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, 663 F.2d 336, 337-338 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 (1982) (Harvard not public institution and not sufficiently intertwined with Commonwealth to meet “[Sjtate action” requirement for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim); Krohn v. Harvard Law Sch., 552 F.2d 21, 23 (1st Cir. 1977) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tencer
United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1037-38 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 264 (1996); see also United States v. DeSimone, 660 F.2d 532, 540 (5th Cir. 1981) (upholding denial of severance where affidavit "amount[ed] to little more than a bare, conclusory assertion that he did not conspire with his co-defendants, nor they with him"), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Steven B. Tencer and Ronald Lazar, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1037-38 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 117 S.Ct. 264 , 136 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996); see also United States v. DeSimone, 660 F.2d 532, 540 (5th Cir.1981) (upholding denial of severance where affidavit “amounted] to little more than a bare, conclusory assertion that he did not conspire with his co-defendants, nor they with him”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1976 , 72 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Nielsen
See also Clark v. City of Los Angeles, 650 F.2d 1033, 1036 (9th Cir.1981) (stating general rule that an appellate court reviews sufficiency of the evidentiary facts to support a trial court's decision to admit evidence and that, "[i]f the grounds given by the district court for admissibility of the evidence are incorrect, the court's ruling will be reversed only if there are no grounds under which the evidence could properly be admitted," but reversing because the court determined that all grounds for admission of hearsay diary were faulty), cert. den. 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1974 , 72 L.Ed.2…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Edward Pritchard, Cross-Appellee v. Rainfair, Inc., Cross-Appellant
Holliday, 732 F.2d at 550-52 ; see also Quinn v. Burlington Northern Inc. Pension Plan, 664 F.2d 675 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1976 , 72 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Sutton
(2×)
See also United States ex rel Allen v Franzen, 659 F2d 745 (CA 7, 1981), cert den 456 US 928 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conrad Noyola v. Texas Department of Human Resources
(2×)
See also Allaire v. Rogers, 658 F.2d 1055 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1975 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982), reh'g denied, 457 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 2949 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1343 (1982); Downing v. Williams, 645 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simmons v. Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Co.
See also Quinn v. Burlington Northern, Inc. Pension Plan, 664 F.2d 675, 678 (8th Cir.1981) (pursuant to ERISA, state law may not be used to interpret pension plan language), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1976 , 72 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Point Landing, Inc. And Point Landing Fuel Corp. v. Omni Capital International, Ltd., Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs- Appellants-Appellees v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., Ltd., Defendant-Third Party and James Gourlay, Third Party William S. Smith, Jr., and Ruby M. Smith v. Omni Capital International, Ltd., Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., Ltd. And James Gourlay, Third Party Frank J. George and Brenda A. George v. Omni Capital International, Ltd., Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., Ltd. And James Gourlay, Third Party Dennis M. Rosenberg and Joan Rosenberg v. Omni Capital International, Ltd., Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., Ltd. And James Gourlay, Third Party
(2×)
See also Terry v. Raymond International, Inc., 5 Cir.1981, 658 F.2d 398, 401 , cert. denied, 1982, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1975 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 , in which this Court declared that in a federal question case the "contours of amenability ... are more fluid". 9 45 In Lapeyrouse v. Texaco, Inc., 5 Cir.1982, 693 F.2d 581 , Judge Williams, for the Court, citing Lone Star and Terry, found that the "sole test for amenability" to personal jurisdiction in a federal question case is the due process clause of the fifth amendment. 10 The opinion states: 46 [T]he Supreme Court's consideration of various f…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Point Landing, Inc. v. Omni Capital International, Ltd.
(2×)
See also Terry v. Raymond International, Inc., 5 Cir.1981, 658 F.2d 398, 401 , cert. denied, 1982, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1975 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 , in which this Court declared that in a federal question case the “contours of amenability ... are more fluid”. 9 In Lapeyrouse v. Texaco, Inc., 5 Cir. 1982, 693 F.2d 581 , Judge Williams, for the Court, citing Lone Star and Terry , found that the “sole test for amenability” to personal jurisdiction in a federal question case is the due process clause of the fifth amendment. 10 The opinion states: [T]he Supreme Court’s consideration of var…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ehredt v. DeHavilland Aircraft Co. of Canada
(2×)
See, e.g., Terry v. Raymond International, Inc., 658 F.2d 398, 404-405 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1975 , 72 L.Ed.2d 443 (1982); Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co., 614 F.2d 301, 317-18 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 981 , 101 S.Ct. 396 , 66 L.Ed.2d 243 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Orr v. Crowder
(2×)
See, e.g., Kilcoyne v. Morgan, 664 F.2d 940 (4th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1976 , 72 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); Clark v. Whiting, 607 F.2d 634 (4th Cir.1979); Jeffries v. Turkey Run Consolidated School District, 492 F.2d 1 (7th Cir.1974); but see Piacitelli v. Southern Utah State College, 636 P.2d 1063 (Utah 1981). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Iron Arrow Honor Society, a \Tap\" or Recognition Association for Men v. Margaret M. Heckler
(2×)
Compare Rice v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, 663 F.2d 336 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, [ 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1976 , 72 L.Ed.2d 444 ] with Haffer v. Temple University, 688 F.2d 14 (3d Cir.1982), relying on Grove City v. Bell, 687 F.2d 684 (3rd Cir.1982), cert. granted, -U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1181 , 75 L.Ed.2d 429 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Vorpahl
Compare Quinn v. Burlington Northern Inc. Pension Plan, 664 F.2d 675, 676-77 (8th Cir.1981) (pension plan not collectively bargained), cer t. denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1976 , 72 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982) with Bueneman v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund, 572 F.2d 1208, 1209 (8th Cir.1978) (pension plan collectively bargained).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Narel
v.
Liburdi, Warden
v.
Liburdi, Warden
No. 81-1556.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 1982.
Published
Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.