Lazzara v. United States, 456 U.S. 943 (1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Lazzara v. United States, 456 U.S. 943 (1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“when alleged brady material is contained in jencks act material, disclosure is generally timely if the government complies with the jencks act”
140 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 35 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Causey (txsd, 2005-02-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Causey
S.D. Tex. · 2005 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
when alleged brady material is contained in jencks act material, disclosure is generally timely if the government complies with the jencks act
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) St. Luke's Medical Center v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1991 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
here congress has provided a method for review, whitecliff and its progeny require that we respect that choice.
discussed Cited "see" Burns v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
“This court has no jurisdiction over claims based upon the Due Process and Equal Protection guarantees of the Fifth Amendment, because these constitutional provisions do not obligate the Federal Government to pay money damages.” Carruth v. United States, 224 Ct.Cl. 422, 445 , 627 F.2d 1068 (1980); Bellamy v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 720, 723 (1985); see Alabama Hospital Ass’n. v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 176, 180 , 656 F.2d 606 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Lynne Simon, Jean Martinez, Marilyn Jacobs, and Carol Lindenberg
11th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 401 (5th Cir.1981) (defendant causes use of *1466 mails when he acts with knowledge that mails will be used in ordinary course of business), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); Banco de Desarrollo Agropecuario, 640 F.Supp. at 1175 (one telephone call within jurisdiction in furtherance of fraud brings activity within statute).
cited Cited "see" United States v. James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto, Seymour A. Gopman, Bernard Rubin, George Wuagneux, Salvatore Tricario, Louis C. Ostrer, and John Giardiello, Defendants- United States of America v. Seymour Gopman, Salvatore Tricario, George Wuagneux, Louis C. Ostrer, John Giardiello, James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto and Bernard Rubin, Defendants
11th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 382-83 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Caporale
11th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 382-83 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Michael G. Michaels
9th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 381 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Dempsey Buford Merida, David Lee Merida, William Benjamin King, Tim Walker and Billy Ray Lilley
5th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); Calley v. Callaway, 519 F.2d 184 (5th Cir.1975) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom, Calley v. Hoffman, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1505 , 47 L.Ed.2d 760 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" Akzona Inc. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
D. Del. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Stevenson v. Grentec, Inc., 652 F.2d 20 , 211 U.S.P.Q. 1020 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2008 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); Ashlow Ltd. v. Morgan Const. Co., 672 F.2d 371 , (4th Cir.1982), and Ashlow Ltd. v. United States Intern.
discussed Cited "see" 13 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 365, 14 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1362 United States of America v. Manuel Frank Rubio, United States of America v. Ronald Harrison Elledge, United States of America v. Donald Duane Smith, United States of America v. John Palomar, United States of America v. Alan David Passaro, United States of America v. Bert Samuel Stefanson
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. 647 F.2d at 964 ("[T]he magistrate was not in error in finding probable cause."). 95 Moreover, the Ellsworth court did not hold that the magistrate could not, in determining probable cause, consider the indictment which a Grand Jury had returned.
cited Cited "see" Hargrett v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Alabama Hospital Association v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 176, 181 , 656 F.2d 606, 610 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Rubio
9th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. 647 F.2d at 964 (“[T]he magistrate was not in error in finding probable cause.”).
discussed Cited "see" Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Inc. v. Tracy Collins Bank & Trust Co.
D. Utah · 1983 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, e.g., United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 383 (5th Cir.1981) cert. denied, Russello v. United States, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); United States v. Barrentine, 591 F.2d 1069, 1077 (5th Cir.1979), rehearing denied, 599 F.2d 1054 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Abbell
S.D. Fla. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
While the number of defendants should not be the determinative factor in whether a court grants or denies a motion to sever, severance becomes necessary if the jury will not be able to "individualize each defendant in his relation to the mass." United States v. Watchmaker, 761 F.2d 1459, 1476 (11th Cir.1985) (quoting Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1101 , 106 S.Ct. 880 , 88 L.Ed.2d 917 (1986); see also, United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 385 (5th Cir.1981) (assessing "`whether ... it is within the capacity of the jur…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. James Walter Starrett, Timothy Kevin Duke, Michael Lee Cave, Donald Joe Sears, James Thomas Nolan, Frederick Joseph Hegney, United States of America v. Donald Joe Sears, James Thomas Nolan
11th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
In order for the jury to find that Nolan associated with the enterprise, the jury need merely find that he was "aware of at least the general existence of the enterprise named in the indictment." United States v. Console, 13 F.3d 641, 653 (3d Cir.1993) (citations and quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1660 , 128 L.Ed.2d 377 (1994); see also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 394 (5th Cir. June 1981) ("A defendant must know something about his co-defendants' related activities which make up the enterprise, but it is not necessary that he be aware of all racket…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Starrett
11th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
In order for the jury to find that Nolan associated with the enterprise, the jury need merely find that he was “aware of at least the general existence of the enterprise named in the indictment.” United States v. Console, 13 F.3d 641, 653 (3d Cir.1993) (citations and quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1660 , 128 L.Ed.2d 377 (1994); see also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 394 (5th Cir. June 1981) (“A defendant must know something about his co-defendants’ related activities which make up the enterprise, but it is not necessary that he be aware of all r…
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Harris
Minn. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 388 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 2007, 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Robert L. Mendenhall, and Cmi Corporation v. Cedarapids, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant (2×)
Fed. Cir. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Stevenson v. Grentec, Inc., 652 F.2d 20, 22-23 , 211 USPQ 1020, 1022 (9th Cir.) (“decisions of [CCPA] should be given weight and treated with respect”), cer t. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2008 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jenkins v. Heckler
D.S.C. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
The waiting period for Jenkins ended May 31, 1982. 42 U.S.C. § 423 (a)(1)(D), 423(c)(2)(A); See e.g., Sanchez v. Schweiker, 656 F.2d 966 (5 Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2008 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kjorsvik
Wash. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Leach, 113 Wn.2d at 700 (Brachtenbach, J., concurring). [20] United States v. Ellsworth, 647 F.2d 957, 962 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 944 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 , 102 S.Ct. 2008 (1982). [21] See, e.g., Kaneshiro v. United States, 445 F.2d 1266, 1269 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 992 , 30 L.Ed.2d 543 , 92 S.Ct. 537 (1971); United States v. Shoup, 608 F.2d 950, 960 (3d Cir.1979); United States v. Mallen, 843 F.2d 1096, 1102 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 849 , 102 L.Ed.2d 103 , 109 S.Ct. 130 (1988); United States v. Wabaunsee, 528 F.2d 1, 2 (7th Cir.1975); United States v…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Cupey Bajo Nursing Home, Inc. v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1991 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Alabama Hospital Association v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 176, 181-182 , 656 F.2d 606, 610 , cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Patrick C. Richerson
5th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
In United States v. L’Hoste, 609 F.2d 796 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 833 , 101 S.Ct. 104 , 66 L.Ed.2d 39 (1980) the court stated that “If the Government proves multiple conspiracies and a defendant’s involvement in at least one of them, then clearly there is no variance affecting that defendant’s substantial rights.” Id. at 801; see also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 382 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul Santo (2×)
11th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 402-03 (5th Cir.1981) (arson and mail fraud arising from same burning), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 , 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2007 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 , 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); United States v. Colacurio, 659 F.2d 684 , 688 n. 4 (5th Cir.1981) (multiple briberies), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1002 , 102 S.Ct. 1635 , 71 L.Ed.2d 869 (1982).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Ybarra v. Reno Thunderbird Mobile Home Village
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Ellsworth, 647 F.2d 957 , 961 n. 8 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 944 , 102 S.Ct. 2008 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982) (four requirements for due process violation). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Benny
N.D. Cal. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 403 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); United States v. Bright, 630 F.2d 804 , 830 n. 47 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Weisman, 624 F.2d 1118 , 1122 n. 3 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lazzara
v.
United States Farina v. United States Russello v. United States Macaluso v. United States Scionti v. United States Morgado v. United States Fisher v. United States Young v. United States and Palermo v. United States
No. 81-905; No. 81-956; No. 81-1458; No. 81-5700; No. 81-5716; No. 81-5748; No. 81-5820; No. 81-5826; No. 81-5865.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 26, 1982.
456 U.S. 943
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: Court of Claims (1) · S.D. Texas (1)

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 648 F. 2d 367.