green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.7 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[W]here Congress has provided a method for review, Whitecliff and its progeny require that we respect that choice.”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Causey
when alleged brady material is contained in jencks act material, disclosure is generally timely if the government complies with the jencks act
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
St. Luke's Medical Center v. United States
here congress has provided a method for review, whitecliff and its progeny require that we respect that choice.
discussed
Cited "see"
Burns v. United States
“This court has no jurisdiction over claims based upon the Due Process and Equal Protection guarantees of the Fifth Amendment, because these constitutional provisions do not obligate the Federal Government to pay money damages.” Carruth v. United States, 224 Ct.Cl. 422, 445 , 627 F.2d 1068 (1980); Bellamy v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 720, 723 (1985); see Alabama Hospital Ass’n. v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 176, 180 , 656 F.2d 606 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lynne Simon, Jean Martinez, Marilyn Jacobs, and Carol Lindenberg
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 401 (5th Cir.1981) (defendant causes use of *1466 mails when he acts with knowledge that mails will be used in ordinary course of business), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); Banco de Desarrollo Agropecuario, 640 F.Supp. at 1175 (one telephone call within jurisdiction in furtherance of fraud brings activity within statute).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Caporale
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 382-83 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
ca11 1986
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 382-83 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael G. Michaels
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 381 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dempsey Buford Merida, David Lee Merida, William Benjamin King, Tim Walker and Billy Ray Lilley
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); Calley v. Callaway, 519 F.2d 184 (5th Cir.1975) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom, Calley v. Hoffman, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1505 , 47 L.Ed.2d 760 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Akzona Inc. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
See Stevenson v. Grentec, Inc., 652 F.2d 20 , 211 U.S.P.Q. 1020 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2008 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); Ashlow Ltd. v. Morgan Const. Co., 672 F.2d 371 , (4th Cir.1982), and Ashlow Ltd. v. United States Intern.
cited
Cited "see"
Hargrett v. United States
See Alabama Hospital Association v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 176, 181 , 656 F.2d 606, 610 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Inc. v. Tracy Collins Bank & Trust Co.
Accord, e.g., United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 383 (5th Cir.1981) cert. denied, Russello v. United States, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); United States v. Barrentine, 591 F.2d 1069, 1077 (5th Cir.1979), rehearing denied, 599 F.2d 1054 .
cited
Cited "see"
Hydaburg Cooperative Ass'n v. United States
See Alabama Hospital Association v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 176, 182 , 656 F. 2d 606, 610 , (1981), cert denied, 456 U.S. 943 (1982). and cases cited thereat.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Abbell
While the number of defendants should not be the determinative factor in whether a court grants or denies a motion to sever, severance becomes necessary if the jury will not be able to "individualize each defendant in his relation to the mass." United States v. Watchmaker, 761 F.2d 1459, 1476 (11th Cir.1985) (quoting Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1101 , 106 S.Ct. 880 , 88 L.Ed.2d 917 (1986); see also, United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 385 (5th Cir.1981) (assessing "`whether ... it is within the capacity of the jur…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca11 1995
In order for the jury to find that Nolan associated with the enterprise, the jury need merely find that he was "aware of at least the general existence of the enterprise named in the indictment." United States v. Console, 13 F.3d 641, 653 (3d Cir.1993) (citations and quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1660 , 128 L.Ed.2d 377 (1994); see also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 394 (5th Cir. June 1981) ("A defendant must know something about his co-defendants' related activities which make up the enterprise, but it is not necessary that he be aware of all racket…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Starrett
In order for the jury to find that Nolan associated with the enterprise, the jury need merely find that he was “aware of at least the general existence of the enterprise named in the indictment.” United States v. Console, 13 F.3d 641, 653 (3d Cir.1993) (citations and quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1660 , 128 L.Ed.2d 377 (1994); see also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 394 (5th Cir. June 1981) (“A defendant must know something about his co-defendants’ related activities which make up the enterprise, but it is not necessary that he be aware of all r…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Harris
See also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 388 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 2007, 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert L. Mendenhall, and Cmi Corporation v. Cedarapids, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant
(2×)
See, e.g., Stevenson v. Grentec, Inc., 652 F.2d 20, 22-23 , 211 USPQ 1020, 1022 (9th Cir.) ("decisions of [CCPA] should be given weight and treated with respect"), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2008 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jenkins v. Heckler
The waiting period for Jenkins ended May 31, 1982. 42 U.S.C. § 423 (a)(1)(D), 423(c)(2)(A); See e.g., Sanchez v. Schweiker, 656 F.2d 966 (5 Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2008 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cupey Bajo Nursing Home, Inc. v. United States
See, e.g., Alabama Hospital Association v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 176, 181-182 , 656 F.2d 606, 610 , cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick C. Richerson
In United States v. L’Hoste, 609 F.2d 796 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 833 , 101 S.Ct. 104 , 66 L.Ed.2d 39 (1980) the court stated that “If the Government proves multiple conspiracies and a defendant’s involvement in at least one of them, then clearly there is no variance affecting that defendant’s substantial rights.” Id. at 801; see also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 382 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul Santo
(2×)
See also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 402-03 (5th Cir.1981) (arson and mail fraud arising from same burning), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 , 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2007 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 , 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); United States v. Colacurio, 659 F.2d 684 , 688 n. 4 (5th Cir.1981) (multiple briberies), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1002 , 102 S.Ct. 1635 , 71 L.Ed.2d 869 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Benny
See also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 403 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); United States v. Bright, 630 F.2d 804 , 830 n. 47 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Weisman, 624 F.2d 1118 , 1122 n. 3 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Veon
Compare United States v. Bello, 470 F.Supp. 723 , with Slappy v. Morris, 649 F.2d 718 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2005 , 72 L.Ed.2d 464 .
Memphis Bank & Trust Co.
v.
Garner, Shelby County Trustee
v.
Garner, Shelby County Trustee
No. 81-1613.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 26, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Claims (1) · S.D. Texas (1)
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Tenn. Probable jurisdiction noted.