green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Layton
But cf. United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 889-90 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); United States v. Kaiser, 660 F.2d 724, 731-32 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 956 , 102 S.Ct. 1467 , 71 L.Ed.2d 674 and 457 U.S. 1121 , 102 S.Ct. 2935 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1333 (1982).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Department of the Navy
See Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United States, 901 F.2d 1530 (10th Cir.1990) (action to enjoin the suspension and resolicitation of a government contract); Colorado Department of Highways v. United States Department of Transportation, 840 F.2d 753 (10th Cir.1988) (action challenging the accounting method used to calculate governmental reimbursement of highway construction costs); Rogers v. Ink, 766 F.2d 430 (10th Cir.1985) (action challenging a decision not to fund local antipoverty organizations); United States v. City of Kansas City, Kansas, 761 F.2d 605 (10th Cir.1985) (action to enjoi…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce Raymond Swinton
See United States v. Bag *382 nariol, 665 F.2d 877, 885 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982) (noting that where trial court learns of possible juror misconduct, it must hold evidentiary hearing to determine precise nature of extraneous information); United States v. Rhodes, 556 F.2d 599, 602 (1st Cir.1977) (stating that denial of motion for new trial without any investigation of exposure to extraneous materials was insufficient response to serious matters raised in affidavit); cf. United States v. Cheyenne, 855 F.2d 566, 568 (8th Cir.1988) (statin…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Estrada, Also Known as Taco Estrada, United States of America v. Daniel Greg Dossett
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 888-89 (9th Cir.1981) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Department of Revenue v. There to Care, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Bagnariol (9th Cir.1981), 665 F.2d 877, 896 , cert. denied, Bagnariol v. United States (1982), 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (scheme to liberalize state gambling laws had sufficient effect on interstate commerce to satisfy jurisdictional requirements of various federal criminal statutes); Gulch Gaming, Inc. v. State of South Dakoto (D.S.D.1991), 781 F.Supp. 621, 626 (requirement that corporations applying for gaming license be owned in the majority by South Dakota residents violated the commerce clause); National Ass'n of Fundraising Ticket Mfrs. v. Humphr…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leonard George Maree, United States of America v. Joseph Brooks
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 884-85 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); Abatino v. United States, 750 F.2d 1442, 1446 (9th Cir.1985); Dickson v. Sullivan, 849 F.2d 403, 406 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
George Lee Hughes v. R.G. Borg
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 887 (9th Cir.1981) (suggesting that overwhelming evidence may be sufficient to uphold a conviction even in the presence of extraneous material), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); United States v. Tebha, 770 F.2d 1454, 1456 (9th Cir.1985) (where other evidence against defendant “was far from overwhelming,” court was constrained to reverse because of extraneous material); cf. United States v. McKinney, 434 F.2d 831, 832-33 (5th Cir.1970) (affirming defendant’s conviction, despite presence of extraneous influen…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter D. Brodie, United States of America v. Nancy A. Brodie
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 885 (9th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); United States v. Langford, 802 F.2d 1176, 1180 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 3235 , 97 L.Ed.2d 740 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Donald Dickson v. G.E. Sullivan, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional Institution
See id.
cited
Cited "see"
Eckhoff v. Director of Revenue
See State v. White, 622 S.W.2d 939, 947 (Mo. banc 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 963 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Dadanian and Jean Dadanian
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 899 (9th Cir.1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State of New Mexico v. Donald T. Regan, Etc.
See Alamo Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Andrus 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981) cert, denied, 456 U.S. 963 , 102 S.Ct. 2041 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); B.K Instrument, Inc. v. United States, supra, 715 F.2d at 727 ; Bakersfield City Sch.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Valdovinois-Valdovinois
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 882 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); United States v. Prairie, 572 F.2d at 1319 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy Moreno Ramirez, United States of America v. Robert H. Reynolds
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 881-83 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982) (tracing development of the defense both in this circuit and in the Supreme Court).
cited
Cited "see"
Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. William F. Smith, Attorney General. Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Philip Shiff Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Acton Corporation Appeal of Anthony R. Martin-Trigona. Anthony Gwara v. William F. Smith, U.S. Attorney General Peter N. Georgiades v. Helen Martin-Trigona. Appeal of Anthony R. Martin-Trigona. Peter N. Georgiades v. Helen Martin-Trigona, Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Federal Communications Commission, Capital Cities Communications, Inc., Intervenor
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 892-93 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Martin-Trigona v. Smith
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 892-93 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James (\Jake\") Rohrer
Fed.R.Evid. 606(b); United States v. Freedson, 608 F.2d 739, 741 (9th Cir.1979); see generally United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 883-89 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeremiah P. Buckley, Ellsworth B. Sargent, Washington Water Power Co., and Sargent-Tyee Construction Co.
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 899 (9th Cir. 1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
River City Markets, Inc. v. Fleming Foods West, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 890-91 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nos. 90-16623, 90-16624
See, e.g., United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 890-91 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982). 11 The district court dismissed the RICO counts under the mistaken belief that Rae v. Union Bank, 725 F.2d 478 (9th Cir.1984), requires that a RICO enterprise "must be an entity separate and distinct from the defendants." Memorandum of Decision and Order at 7.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People in Interest of MN
There is both federal and state authority recognizing the proposition that "governmental over involvement, if `outrageous,' will bar prosecution of a defendant on the ground of deprivation of due process even if he is `predisposed.'" State v. Hohensee, 650 S.W.2d at 271 ; see also United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); United States v. Fekri, 650 F.2d 1044 (9th Cir.1981); United States v. Twigg, 588 F.2d 373 (3d Cir.1978); Batres-Santolino, 521 F.Supp. 744 ; Isaacson, 44 N.Y.2d 511 , 378 N.E.2d 78 , 406 N.Y.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People ex rel. M.N.
There is both federal and state authority recognizing the proposition that “governmental over involvement, if ‘outrageous,’ will bar prosecution of a defendant on the ground of deprivation of due process even if he is ‘predisposed.’ ” State v. Hohensee, 650 S.W.2d at 271 ; see also United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); United States v. Fekri, 650 F.2d 1044 (9th Cir.1981); United States v. Twigg, 588 F.2d 373 (3d Cir.1978); Batres-Santolino, 521 F.Supp. 744 ; Isaacson, 44 N.Y.2d 511 , 378 N.E.2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Republic of the Philippines v. Ferdinand E. Marcos, Imelda R. Marcos, Ramon Azurin, Diosdado C. Ordonez and Ancor Holdings, N.V.
(2×)
See also United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 892 (9th Cir.1981) (effect on commerce is an essential element of a RICO violation), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wallace Rogers v. Dwight Ink
Plaintiffs are therefore seeking recovery of at least $228,444. 9 17 Several courts have noted that "when the 'prime objective' or 'essential purpose' of the complaining party is to obtain money from the federal government (in an amount in excess of $10,000), the Claims Court's exclusive jurisdiction is triggered." New Mexico v. Regan, 745 F.2d 1318, 1322 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 2138 , 85 L.Ed.2d 496 (1985); see also Alamo Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 963 , 102 S.Ct. 2041 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. Ink
Plaintiffs are therefore seeking recovery of at least $228,444. 9 Several courts have noted that “when the ‘prime objective’ or ‘essential purpose’ of the complaining party is to obtain money from the federal government (in an amount in excess of $10,000), the Claims Court’s exclusive jurisdiction is triggered.” New Mexico v. Regan, 745 F.2d 1318, 1322 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2138 , 85 L.Ed.2d 496 (1985); see also Alamo Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 963 , 102 S.Ct. 2041 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. City of Kansas City, Kansas, Appellee/cross-Appellant
The City’s shift in requested remedies is unavailing, however, because even if characterized as a request for injunctive or declaratory relief, the City’s claim runs afoul of the Tucker Act under this court’s decision in Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. Bergland, 664 F.2d 818, 823-24 (10th Cir. 1981); see also Alamo Navajo School Bd. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 963 , 102 S.Ct. 2041 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
G. B.
v.
Illinois
v.
Illinois
No. 81-6237.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 3, 1982.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.