green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Commercial Consortium of California
See In re THC Financial Corp., 659 F.2d 951 , 955 n. 2 (9th Cir.1981), cert. den., 456 U.S. 977 , 102 S.Ct. 2244 , 72 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982) (stating the pre-Code rule).
discussed
Cited "see"
First National Bank of Chicago v. Committee of Creditors Holding Unsecured Claims (In Re Powerine Oil Co.)
See In re THC Financial Corp., 659 F.2d 951 , 955 n. 2 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 977 , 102 S.Ct. 2244 , 72 L.Ed.2d 852 . 2 The purpose of Code Section 330 was to overrule this doctrine, and to ensure adequate compensation for bankruptcy attorneys so that qualified specialists would not be forced to abandon the practice of bankruptcy law in favor of more remunerative kinds of work.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Application of the President's Commission on Organized Crime. Subpoena of Lorenzo Scaduto
(2×)
See United States v. Brummitt, 665 F.2d 521 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 977 , 102 S.Ct. 2244 , 72 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982); In Re Tierney, 465 F.2d 806 (5th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 914 , 93 S.Ct. 959 , 35 L.Ed.2d 276 (1973); In Re Flanagan, 691 F.2d 116 (2d Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Southwestern Media, Inc. v. Albert M. Rau and Henry Jacobowitz
See In re THC Financial Corp., 659 F.2d 951, 954 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 977 , 102 S.Ct. 2244 , 72 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cervantes Salazar v. Dretke
See, e.g., Soria v. Johnson, 207 F.3d at 249 (“the fact that an identifiable minority group votes in a proportion lower than the rest of the population and is therefore underrepresented [sic] on jury panels presents no constitutional issue.”), quoting United States v. Brummitt, 665 F.2d 521, 527 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 977 , 102 S.Ct. 2244 , 72 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982), in turn quoting United States v. Lopez, 588 F.2d 450, 452 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 2895 , 61 L.Ed.2d 319 (1979), in turn citing United States v. Arlt, 567 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5th Cir.1978…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of The Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 32 v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e.g., Huber and Antilla Constr. v. Carpenters Local 470, 659 F.2d 1013, 1017-18 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 977 , 102 S.Ct. 2244 , 72 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 32, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 32, Afl-Cio
See, e.g., Huber and Antilla Constr. v. Carpenters Local 470, 659 F.2d 1013, 1017-18 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 977 , 102 S.Ct. 2244 , 72 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert F. Timmel v. Lyman Phillips, M.D.
See also United States v. Brummitt, 665 F.2d 521, 527 (5th Cir.1981) ("Castaneda requires the showing of some form of intentional discrimination.") (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 977 , 102 S.Ct. 2244 , 72 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Castonguay
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Brummitt, 665 F.2d 521, 529 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 977 , 102 S. Ct. 2244 , 72 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. E.A. Gregory, Vonna Jo Gregory, G.W. Atkinson and Robert T. Spurlock, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Brummitt, 665 F.2d 521, 528-30 (5th Cir.1981) (Hispanic Americans), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 977 , 102 S.Ct. 2244 , 72 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982); United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 442-43 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (residents of divisions within judicial district), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 2967, 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982); United States v. Goff, 509 F.2d 825, 826-27 (5th Cir.) (blacks and indigents), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 857 , 96 S.Ct. 109 , 46 L.Ed.2d 83 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Constar, Inc. v. Plumbers Local 447
In general, it appears that where the union cannot know that the “primary” employees and the primary employer’s suppliers will only utilize the reserved gate, it is free to picket wherever those proper objects of its measures can “reasonably” be believed to be found, including the “neutral gate.” Helgesen v. International Assn of Ironworkers, Local 495, 548 F.2d 175 , at 183 n. 8 (7th Cir.1977); see also Huber & Antilla Construction v. Carpenters Local 470, 659 F.2d 1013 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 977 , 102 S.Ct. 2244 , 72 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of Martin Flanagan. United States of America v. Martin Flanagan
(2×)
See also United States v. Brummitt, 665 F.2d 521, 524 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 2244 , 72 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982) (counsel "pointed out that Mexican criminal law, which permits in absentia prosecutions, imposes harsh criminal penalties and that Mexican courts would not be bound by a grant of immunity in the United States").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Conway
v.
Oklahoma
v.
Oklahoma
No. 81-1841.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1982.
Published
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.