green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
United States v. Jean D. Littlefield, United States of America v. George G. Nicoladze, United States of America v. Fred F. Solomon, Jr.
(4×)
But see United States v. Dean, 667 F.2d 729, 732-34 (8th Cir.) (en banc 4-3 vote), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1982) (defense waived right to seek a second trial because it did not report to the court its receipt of an anonymous note during trial indicating jury bias).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Potts
See State v. Cleppe, 96 Wn.2d 373 , 635 P.2d 435 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Kennedy Caldwell
(2×)
See United States v. Dean, 667 F.2d 729, 732-34 (8th Cir.) (en bane), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1982); United States v. Laird, 948 F.2d 444, 446 (8th Cir.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James K. Caldwell
See United States v. Dean, 667 F.2d 729, 732-34 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 (1982); United States v. Laird, 948 F.2d 444, 446 (8th Cir. 1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rivas
See State v. Cleppe, 96 Wn.2d 373, 380 , 635 P.2d 435 (1981) (intent or knowledge not an element of unlawful possession of drugs), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 (1982); State v. Stroh, 91 Wn.2d 580, 583-84 , 588 P.2d 1182 , 8 A.L.R.4th 760 (1979) (intent not an element of witness tampering); Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246 , 96 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
HNV Central River Front Corp. v. United States
(2×)
See Pueblo of Santo Domingo v. United States, 647 F.2d 1087, 1089 , 227 Ct.Cl. 265, 267 (1981), cert, denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Philadelphia Reserve Supply Co. v. Nowalk & Associates, Inc.
See United States v. Dean, 647 F.2d 779, 791-92 (8th Cir.1981), reh’g on other grounds, 667 F.2d 729 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S, 1006, 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1982); United States v. Anderson, 626 F.2d 1358 , 1367 n. 16 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1351 , 67 L.Ed.2d 336 (1981); United States v. Weisman, 624 F.2d 1118 , 1122 n. 3 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1980); United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352 , 363 n. 32 (9th Cir.1975), cert.denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976); United Sta…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
See State v. Cleppe, 96 Wn.2d 373 , 635 P.2d 435 (1981) (guilty knowledge is an implicit element of the crime of "delivery", but not simple "possession", of a controlled substance), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Abcasis
(2×)
However, some courts have held that Rule 606(b) could not be applied to exclude such evidence if “taken at face value, the evidence established a constitutional violation”, Developments, supra at 1597, because “[i]n egregious cases the resulting misconduct might offend fundamental fairness even though the legislative history of Rule 606(b) argues for juror privacy.” Crump, Jury Misconduct, Jury Interviews, and the Federal Rules of Evidence, 66 N.C.L.Rev. 509, 524 (1988); see United States v. Dean, 647 F.2d 779, 785 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sims
See State v. Cleppe, 96 Wn.2d 373, 378-81 , 635 P.2d 435 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lucy Marrero
(2×)
See United States v. Dean, 647 F.2d 779, 785 (8th Cir.1981), rev’d on other grounds, 667 F.2d 729 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (reversing panel on ground that by failing to bring his knowledge of possible juror bias to the attention of the district court prior to the rendering of the verdict the defendant waived his right to a new trial based on juror bias), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dawkins v. State
(2×)
See State v. Rippley, 319 N.W.2d 129 (N.D.1982), and State v. Cleppe, 96 Wash.2d 373 , 635 P.2d 435 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1982). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. J. Clenton Henson (87-5132) Sheila Henson Lutz (87-5138) & C. Alan Henson (87-5144)
(2×)
See United States v. Galloway, 664 F.2d 161, 164-65 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Blackshear
See State v. Cleppe, 96 Wn.2d 373 , 635 P.2d 435 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pandick, Inc. v. Rooney
(2×)
See United States v. Dean, 647 F.2d 779, 788 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Warfield
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Cleppe, 96 Wash.2d 373, 380-81 , 635 P.2d 435 (1981) (availability of unwitting possession defense is justification for imposing strict liability for crime of drug possession), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Warfield
See, e.g., State v. Cleppe, 96 Wn.2d 373, 380-81 , 635 P.2d 435 (1981) (availability of unwitting possession defense is justification for imposing strict liability for crime of drug possession), cert, denied, 456 U.S. 1006 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Calderon
(2×)
Jones, 597 F.2d at 489 ; see also United States v. Dean, 667 F.2d 729, 732-34 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (holding that untimely notification of juror misconduct waives right to new trial even where actual prejudice can be shown), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alberto Calderon
(2×)
Jones, 597 F.2d at 489 ; see also United States v. Dean, 667 F.2d 729, 732-34 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (holding that untimely notification of juror misconduct waives right to new trial even where actual prejudice can be' shown), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Edwards
See, e.g., State v. Cleppe, 96 Wn.2d 373, 377-80 , 635 P.2d 435 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 (1982); State v. Elmore, 54 Wn.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Delores Bennett, United States of America v. Noble Laverne Bennett, Also Known as Turtle, Also Known as Little Brother, United States of America v. George Dixon, Also Known as Willie MacK Also Known as Dick, Also Known as Big Brother, United States of America v. Darryl Gillespie, Also Known as Hawk, Also Known as Hawkeye
(2×)
Whether a particular course of conduct involves one or more distinct 'offenses' ... depends on this congressional choice." Id. at 69-70 , 98 S.Ct. at 2181-82 ; see also United States v. Dean, 647 F.2d 779, 785 (8th Cir.1981), modified en banc on other grounds, 667 F.2d 729 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1982); United States v. Marable, 578 F.2d 151 , 154 n. 1 (5th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bennett
(2×)
Whether a particular course of conduct involves one or more distinct ‘offenses’ ... depends on this congressional choice.” Id. at 69-70 , 98 S.Ct. at 2181-82 ; see also United States v. Dean, 647 F.2d 779, 785 (8th Cir.1981), modified en banc on other grounds, 667 F.2d 729 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1982); United States v. Marable, 578 F.2d 151 , 154 n. 1 (5th Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Johnson
(2×)
See also State v. Cleppe, 96 Wn.2d 373 , 635 P.2d 435 (1981) (guilty knowledge is an implicit element of the crime of delivery, but not simple possession, of a controlled substance), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 (1982); State v. Sims, 119 Wn.2d 138 , 829 P.2d 1075 (1992) (guilty knowledge is not an additional element which must be proved in prosecution for possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance; the statute includes the requisite mental state, i.e., intent).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Geary Distributing Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. All Brand Importers, Inc., Cross-Appellee
(2×)
See California v. La Rue, 409 U.S. 109 , 93 S.Ct. 390 , 34 L.Ed.2d 342 (1972); Park Benziger & Co. v. Southern Wine & Spirits, Inc., 391 So.2d 681, 683 (Fla.1980); see also Bellanca v. New York State Liquor Auth., 54 N.Y.2d 228 , 429 N.E.2d 765 , 445 N.Y.S.2d 87 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1982); Heublein, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 237 Va. 192 , 376 S.E.2d 77 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bucey
(2×)
A defendant need not actually intend, agree to or even know of a specific mailing to “cause” mail to be sent as long as he or she “does an act with knowledge that the use of mails will *1089 follow in the ordinary course of business, or where such can reasonably be foreseen____” See Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1, 8-9 , 74 S.Ct. 358, 362-63 , 98 L.Ed. 435 (1953); United States v.. Wormick, 709 F.2d 454, 461 (7th Cir.1983) (a defendant “can be held accountable for mailings caused by other members, whether or not he knew of or agreed to any specific mailing.”); See also United …
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cecil Leon Ramsey
(4×)
See also United States v. Dean, 667 F.2d 729, 733-34 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 456 U.S. 1006 , 102 S.Ct. 2296 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1300 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thompson
v.
Woltenberg
v.
Woltenberg
No. 81-1525.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1982.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.