green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1987 ·
…corroborated grand jury testimony which for one reason or another is unavailable at trial is neither rare nor exceptional, and in our opinion its general admission under this theory would constitute a 'major revision' of the hearsay rule ...
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1987 ·
…the court determines that the alleged combination of individuals associated in fact with various corporations is an association and thus, an enterprise under 18 u.s.c. 1961 (4).
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Snider v. Lone Star Art Trading Co., Inc.
(2×)
the court determines that the alleged combination of individuals associated in fact with various corporations is an association and thus, an enterprise under 18 u.s.c. 1961 (4).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Vigoa
(2×)
corroborated grand jury testimony which for one reason or another is unavailable at trial is neither rare nor exceptional, and in our opinion its general admission under this theory would constitute a 'major revision' of the hearsay rule ...
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Bent
United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 633-34 (5th Cir.) (Unit B), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , -, 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 3489, 73 L.Ed.2d 1303, 1370 (1982).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Eusebio Whittaker Bent, Jose Compaz Cuerro, Ramon Antonio Pena Bello, Jose Gutierez, Victor Paredes, Victor Quinones, Robert P. Ybarra, Milton Brinkley Payne, United States of America v. Jason Newball Steele
United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 633-34 (5th Cir.) (Unit B), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , ----, 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 3489, 73 L.Ed.2d 1303, 1370 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. Auto Craft Shop
(2×)
See Labash v. United States Dep’t of Army, 668 F.2d 1153, 1155 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982); Towry v. United States, 459 F.Supp. 101, 108 (E.D.La.1978) (holding that judicial review is precluded even where the outcome “is alleged to be arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and not based on substantial evidence”), aff 'd, 620 F.2d 568 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1078 , 101 S.Ct. 858 , 66 L.Ed.2d 801 (1981); but see, Welch v. United States, 446 F.Supp. 75, 78 (D.Conn.1978) (based upon its examination of the legislative h…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Lauree Flaa Brekke James Stanley Brekke, Appellees/cross-Appellants
See United States v. Martinez, 667 F.2d 886, 889 (10th Cir.1981) (Lay, F. Gibson, and Bright, JJ., sitting by special designation), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2301 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1982); United States v. Castellanos, 478 F.2d 749, 751 (2d Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lauree Brekke
See United States v. Martinez, 667 F.2d 886, 889 (10th Cir. 1981) (Lay, F. Gibson, and Bright, JJ., sitting by special designation), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 (1982); United States v. Castellanos, 478 F.2d 749, 751 (2d Cir. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. GLEN SLAUGHTER & ASSOCIATES
(2×)
See United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 645 (5th Cir.), certs. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982), 458 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct 3489 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1370 (1982), and 459 U.S. 825 , 103 S.Ct. 57 , 74 L.Ed.2d 61 (1982). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
MacCaskill v. United States
(2×)
The MCA expressly excludes judicial review of claims adjudicated under its provisions. 10 U.S.C. § 2735 ; see Labash v. United States, 668 F.2d 1153 (10th Cir.1982) cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982) (§ 2735 contains “clear and convincing evidence” that Congress intended to preclude judicial review of administrative decisions under the MCA).
cited
Cited "see"
Parnell Seaton v. John Jabe
See McNary v. Sowders, 660 F.2d 703 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmy Beaumont
(2×)
In other words, a defendant’s ignorance of the law prohibiting structuring is no defense if he knew about filing requirements and intentionally acted to evade or assisted in evading them. 7 Relying upon Cheek v. United States, 498 U.S. 192 , -, 111 S.Ct. 604, 609-10 , 112 L.Ed.2d 617 (1991), Beaumont argues that the government was required to prove that *94 (1) he knew that structuring was against the law and (2) specifically intended to violate the law against structuring. 8 Beaumont did not object to this structuring instruction at trial, and “we have held in the past that where no timel…
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Beaumont
Neither Beaumont nor his co-defendants requested any other instruction regarding this issue. 5 Relying upon Cheek v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 111 S. Ct. 604, 609-610 (1991), Beaumont argues that the government was required to prove that (1) he knew that structuring was against the law and (2) specifically intended to violate the law against structuring.8 Beaumont did not object to this structuring instruction at trial, and "we have held in the past that where no timely objection is made to a jury instruction, the claimed error cannot be reviewed on appeal unless giving the instruction…
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodrigue v. United States
(2×)
See Labash v. United States Dept. of Army, 668 F.2d 1153 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982); Poindexter v. United States, 777 F.2d 231 (5th Cir.1985); Broadnax v. United States Army, 710 F.2d 865 (D.C.Cir.1983); Bryson v. United States, 463 F.Supp. 908 (E.D.Pa.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ahumedo-Avendano
(2×)
See United States v. Liles, 670 F.2d 989, 991 (11th Cir.), (holding that 21 U.S.C. § 955a(f), the predecessor of section 1903(f), should be read in para mate-ria with section 3238), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Norwood v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982); United States v. Gleason, 616 F.2d 2 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1082 , 100 S.Ct. 1037 , 62 L.Ed.2d 767 (1980); United States v. Lenz, 616 F.2d 960 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 929 , 100 S.Ct. 3028 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1124 (1980); United States v. Graham, 548 F.2d 1302 (8th Cir.1977); United States v. Alessio, 528 F.2d 1079 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 948 , 96 S.Ct. 3167 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1184 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. Fletcher
(2×)
See United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 625-26 (5th Cir. Unit B), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982); see also United States v. Navarro-Ordas, 770 F.2d 959 , 969 n. 19 (11th Cir.1985) (group of corporations may constitute association-in-fact), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1200 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986); McCullough, 757 F.2d at 143-44 (sole proprietorship and employees may constitute association-in-fact); United States v. Aimone, 715 F.2d 822, 828 (3d Cir.1983) (individuals and corporations may constitute association-in-fact), cert. denied, 468 U.S…
cited
Cited "see"
Campbell v. State
See Coble v. State, 274 Ark. 134 , 624 S.W.2d 421 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 (1982); see also Roderick v. State, 288 Ark. 360 , 705 S.W.2d 433 (1986); Ark.
discussed
Cited "see"
J. Gary Madsen v. The United States of America, Ex Rel. The United States Army, Corps of Engineers
(2×)
See LaBash v. United States Dept. of Army, 668 F.2d 1153 , 1156 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
(2×)
See United States v. Thevis, 84 F.R.D. 57 (N.D.Ga.1979), aff'd on other grounds, 665 F.2d 616 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation. The Dow Chemical Company"
(2×)
Thus, notwithstanding any circumstances in which state law would hold a private person liable for his acts, if those circumstances are in any material respect not "like" those in which the government's act occurred, there has been no FTCA waiver of sovereign immunity. 14 Caban v. United States, 728 F.2d 68, 73-74 (2d Cir.1984); see Arvanis v. Noslo Engineering Consultants, Inc., 739 F.2d 1287, 1292 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S.Ct. 964 , 83 L.Ed.2d 969 (1985). 15 Feres created a bar against recovery that was substantive, not procedural, Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United S…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Caporale
See United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 625-26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto, Seymour A. Gopman, Bernard Rubin, George Wuagneux, Salvatore Tricario, Louis C. Ostrer, and John Giardiello, Defendants- United States of America v. Seymour Gopman, Salvatore Tricario, George Wuagneux, Louis C. Ostrer, John Giardiello, James Caporale, Alfred Pilotto and Bernard Rubin, Defendants
See United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 625-26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Franke Eugenio Martinez
See United States v. Martinez, 667 F.2d 886, 890 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2301 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Heller v. United States
(2×)
Towry v. United States, 459 F.Supp. 101, 108 (E.D.La.1978), aff 'd, 620 F.2d 568 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1078 , 101 S.Ct. 858 , 66 L.Ed.2d 801 (1981); see Labash v. United States, 668 F.2d 1153 , 1156 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Heller v. United States
(2×)
Towry v. United States, 459 F.Supp. 101, 108 (E.D.La.1978), aff'd, 620 F.2d 568 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1078 , 101 S.Ct. 858 , 66 L.Ed.2d 801 (1981); see Labash v. United States, 668 F.2d 1153 , 1156 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2299 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982).III. 15 The district court observed that Heller possesses two distinct remedies to seek relief for the alleged wrongful death of his wife: Heller can sue the individual defendants under Philippine tort law in the Republic of the Philippines or proceed with his claim under the Military Claims Act.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roscoe Emory Dean, Jr., in Re United States of America
(2×)
See United States v. Dean, 666 F.2d 174 (5th Cir. Unit B), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982). 2 .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold Donald Henry
(4×)
See generally United States v. Dean, 666 F.2d 174 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gallagher v. State
See United States v. Goldstein, (9th Cir.1976) 532 F.2d 1305 , cert. denied 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 , cf. United States v. Thevis, (5th Cir.1982) 665 F.2d 616 , cert. denied 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Veliotis
(2×)
See United States v. Thevis, 474 F.Supp. 134, 143 (N.D.Ga.1979), aff'd, 665 F.2d 616 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold Haimowitz, Dan Scarborough, George L. Onett
(2×)
See United States v. Dean, 666 F.2d 174 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Johnson
(2×)
See United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 638-39 (5th Cir.) cert. denied Evans v. United States, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 ; cert. denied Hood v. United States, 458 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 3489, 73 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Papadakis
(2×)
Accord United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 630-31 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982); United States v. Baiano, 618 F.2d 624, 628-30 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 840 , 101 S.Ct. 118 , 66 L.Ed.2d 47 (1980); United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, 1357-60 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clarence Lee McDowell
(2×)
See U.S. v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 633-34 (5th Cir.) (Unit B), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Melvin Harris
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 641 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982); United States v. Amaral, 488 F.2d 1148, 1152-53 (9th Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simmons v. Lockhart
See also Coble v. State, 274 Ark. 134 , 624 S.W.2d 421, 424 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2301 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1982); Penn v. State, 284 Ark. 234 , 681 S.W.2d 307, 308 (1984); Clines v. State, 280 Ark. 77 , 656 S.W.2d 684 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bell v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Coble v. State, 274 Ark. 134 , 624 S.W.2d 421 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mcmahon v. Mcdowell
See also United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 626 (5th Cir.), cert. denied in 456 U.S. 1108 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982), and in 458 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 3489 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1370 (1982), and in 459 U.S. 825 , 103 S.Ct. 57 , 74 L.Ed.2d 61 (1982) ("although ordinarily a panel must adhere to prior decisions of this court, our first duty is to follow the dictates of the United States Supreme Court."); Ralpho v. Bell, 569 F.2d 607, 629 (D.C.Cir.1977). 30 The district court's holding that plaintiffs' state law claims for fringe benefits and pension contributions are preempted by ERISA …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McMahon v. McDowell
See also United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 626 (5th Cir.), cert. denied in 456 U.S. 1108 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982), and in 458 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 3489 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1370 (1982), and in 459 U.S. 825 , 103 S.Ct. 57 , 74 L.Ed.2d 61 (1982) (“although ordinarily a panel must adhere to prior decisions of this court, our first duty is to follow the dictates of the United States Supreme Court.”); Ralpho v. Bell, 569 F.2d 607, 629 (D.C.Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bunker Ramo Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. United Business Forms, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, and Edward M. Reif, and Marvin H. Cywan
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 625 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 458 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 3489, 73 L.Ed.2d 1303, 1370 (1982); United States v. Huber, 603 F.2d 387, 393-94 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 927 , 100 S.Ct. 1312 , 63 L.Ed. 2d 758 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Brian Miller
See also United States v. Liles, 670 F.2d 989, 992 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Labash
v.
United States Department of the Army
v.
United States Department of the Army
No. 81-2003.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Michigan (2) · D. New Jersey (2)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.