green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 38 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. George M. Khoury, Howard Kluver, David W. West, Louis H. Chippas
Not only must a defendant demonstrate actual conflict, but he must also show that the actual conflict “had an adverse effect upon his lawyer’s representation.” Lightbourne, 829 F.2d at 1023 ; see Stevenson v. Newsome, 774 F.2d 1558, 1562 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1089 , 106 S.Ct. 1476 , 89 L.Ed.2d 731 (1986); but cf. Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F.2d 391, 396-97 (1981) (defendant need not show adverse effect upon representation if defendant demonstrates actual conflict), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982).
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Stacy
U.S. v. Gutman, 725 F.2d 417 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 244 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984), (Trial court has a duty in appropriate case to conduct competency hearing regarding witness’s sanity, but judge did not abuse discretion in disallowing hearing in this case); U.S. v. Odom, 736 F.2d 104 (4th Cir.1984) (Can disqualify as incompetent a witness who does not have knowledge of the relevant facts, lacks the capacity to recall, or who does not understand duty to testify truthfully, but no error where trial judge found witnesses competent); but see, U.S. v. McRary, 616 F.2d…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Joseph Thomas v. Dale E. Foltz
But see Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F.2d 391, 396-97 (Former 5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982) (holding that habeas petitioner need not demonstrate adverse effect on representation but need only prove an actual conflict to justify habeas relief on account of a conflict of interest).
discussed
Cited "see"
James M. Edens v. Robert D. Hannigan and Attorney General of Kansas
See Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F.2d 391, 397 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982) (holding that defense counsel suffered from an actual conflict of interest in representing two codefendants because had the attorney not been facing a conflict of interest, he might have been able to negotiate a plea agreement on one defendant’s behalf in return for becoming a prosecution witness against the eodefendant).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gregorio T. ex rel. Jose T. v. Wilson
See Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813, 818 (9th Cir.) (abstention involves discretion on exercise of court’s equity powers), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2308 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gregorio T., by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem Jose T. Xiomara T. Maria R. Carlos P., by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem Ana P., and California Association of Catholic Hospitals City of Los Angeles, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. Pete Wilson, Governor, of the State of California Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, for the State of California Kimberly Belshe, Director, of the Department of Health Services for the State of California Eloise Anderson, Director, of the Department of Social Services for the State of California, League of United Latin American Citizens v. Pete Wilson, Governor, of the State of California Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, for the State of California Kimberly Belshe, Director, of the Department of Health Services for the State of California Eloise Anderson, Director, of the Department of Social Services for the State of California, and Orange Unified School District San Diego Unified School District William D. Dawson, Acting Superintendent of Public Instruction, for the State of California, Barbara Ayala, a Minor, by and Through Her Guardian Ad Litem, Andrea Ayala v. Pete Wilson, Governor, of the State of California Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, for the State of California Kimberly Belshe, Director, of the Department of Health Services for the State of California Eloise Anderson, Director, of the Department of Social Services for the State of California, and Alhambra Unified School District, Children Who Want an Education, Who Are Undocumented in America, Who Will Be Adversely Affected by California Proposition 187 v. Pete Wilson, Governor, of the State of California Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, for the State of California Kimberly Belshe, Director, of the Department of Health Services for the State of California Eloise Anderson, Director, of the Department of Social Services for the State of California, and Los Angeles Unified School District
See Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813, 818 (9th Cir.) (abstention involves discretion on exercise of court's equity powers), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2308 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Leon Anderson, United States of America v. James Leon Anderson
See United States v. Bennett, 675 F.2d 596, 597-98 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 (1982). 26 Because Hess's in-court identification of Anderson was not impermissibly suggestive, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of Anderson's motion for a mistrial.
discussed
Cited "see"
Raleigh Porter v. Harry K. Singletary, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
See Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F.2d 391 , 394 n. 5 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982). 7 Petitioner has articulated a potential conflict of interest.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramiro Carrion-Caliz
(2×)
See United States v. McRary, 665 F.2d 674, 678 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2306 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1983) (phrase "transports in foreign commerce" in kidnapping statute requires that victim be kidnapped in U.S. and then transported to foreign state); United States v. McInnis, 601 F.2d 1319 (5th Cir.1979). 16 The Hostage Taking Act, by contrast, was adopted specifically "to extend jurisdiction over extraterritorial crimes and satisfy the country's obligations as a party to various international conventions." United States v. Yunis, 681 F.Supp. 896, 904 (D.D.C.…
cited
Cited "see"
Sun Dun, Inc. of Washington v. Coca-Cola Co.
See Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813, 822 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2308 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982). 15 .
cited
Cited "see"
Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of Bakersfield
See Turf Paradise v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813, 819 (9th Cir.1982) (citing Pue v. Sillas, 632 F.2d 74, 78 (9th Cir.1980)), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2308 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ramseur
(2×)
See People v. Lewis, 88 Ill. 2d 129 , 58 Ill.Dec. 895, 904 , 430 N.E. 2d 1346, 1355 (1982) ("prosecutor could properly urge the imposition of death as a deterrent to murder"), cert. den., 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 , 73 L.Ed. 2d 1308 (1982); Commonwealth v. Zettlemoyer, 500 Pa. 16 , 454 A. 2d 937, 958 (1982), cert. den., 461 U.S. 970 , 103 S.Ct. 2444 , 77 *322 L.Ed. 2d 1327 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Edward Jackson, Jr.
See United States v. Bennett, 675 F.2d 596 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiffs v. Board of Equalization of the State of California, Southern Pacific Transportation Company v. Board of Equalization of the State of California, Trailer Train Company v. Board of Equalization of the State of California
See Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813, 819 (9th Cir.1982) (abstention is an "extraordinary and narrow exception that will normally be appropriate only when the consequences of exercising jurisdiction clearly outweigh the obligation to adjudicate suits over which the federal court has jurisdiction"), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2308 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Armstrong v. People
See Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F.2d 391 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982); Camera v. Fogg, 658 F.2d 80 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1129 , 102 S.Ct. 981 , 71 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Arizona Downs v. Turf Paradise, Inc.
See Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2308 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bowie
United States v. Dupas, 17 M.J. 689 (A.C.M.R.1983); Gaines v. Hopper, 575 F.2d 1147 (5th Cir.1978); see Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F.2d 391 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ben Adair
See Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813, 821 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2308 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982). 90 The Government claims that its water rights in former reservation land derive from two sources.
discussed
Cited "see"
Justice v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
See Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813, 818-19 (9th Cir.1982), cert, denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2308 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982); Western Waste Service v. Universal Waste Control, 616 F.2d 1094, 1097 (9th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 869 , 101 S.Ct. 205 , 66 L.Ed.2d 88 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Adair
See Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813, 821 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2308 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Osborne
See generally Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F.2d 391 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 (1982); Kemp v. Leggett, 635 F.2d 453 (5th Cir. 1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Neville Bruce Thompson
(2×)
See United States v. Bennett, 675 F.2d 596, 598 (4th Cir.), cert, denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2306 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982); United States v. Ravich, 421 F.2d 1196, 1203 (2d Cir.1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Laurest J. Trahan, Cross-Appellees v. Superior Oil Company, Cross-Appellants
See Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F.2d 391, 396-97 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982); Zuck v. State of Ala., 588 F.2d 436, 440 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 833 , 100 S.Ct. 633 , 62 L.Ed.2d 42 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Byrd v. State
See also United States v. Bennett, 675 F.2d 596, 598 (4th Cir.1982) (noting that propriety of in-court identification procedure is determined in the exercise of trial court’s discretion), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2306 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982). 27 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyd v. Scott
PROCEDURAL BAR5 3 Williams v. Collins, 16 F.3d 626, 630 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 42 (1994); see also, Baty v. Balkom, 661 F.2d 391 , 394 n.7 (5th Cir. 1981) (stating that standard of review for questions of law and mixed questions of fact and law allows reviewing court to substitute its judgment for that of lower court), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 (1982). 4 We note that the standard of review for an Allen charge raised on direct appeal is not the same as for an Allen charge raised pursuant to a writ for habeas corpus.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyd v. Scott
(2×)
Id. at 501 , 17 S.Ct. at 157 2 Boyd objected to the supplemental instruction before it was read on the ground that it forced the minority jurors to change their views 3 Williams v. Collins, 16 F.3d 626, 630 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 42 , 129 L.Ed.2d 937 (1994); see also, Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F.2d 391 , 394 n. 7 (5th Cir.1981) (stating that standard of review for questions of law and mixed questions of fact and law allows reviewing court to substitute its judgment for that of lower court), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982) 4 We no…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Jairo Arango
See United States v. Echeles, 352 F.2d 892 (7th Cir.1965) (severance appropriate if single trial of several defendants defeats right to a fundamentally fair trial); see also Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F.2d 391, 392 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 (1982) (joint representation of two defendants with inconsistent defenses violated Sixth Amendment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allied MacHinery Service, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
Compare American Disposal Services, Inc. v. O’Brien, 839 F.2d 84 (2d Cir.1988) (upholding district court’s dismissal of plaintiff s federal § 1983 action under Colorado River) with Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813 (9th Cir.1982) (holding that a federal court improperly dismissed suit on abstention grounds where there was no concurrent jurisdiction over the federal claims), cert. denied 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2308 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ors, Inc.
See also Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813, 818-19 (9th Cir.) (“There must be a ‘sufficient nexus’ between the activity and interstate commerce so that it can be said ‘as a practical matter of economics’ there is ‘a not insubstantial effect on the line of commerce involved.’ ”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2308 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stringer v. Scroggy
See also Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F.2d 391, 395 (5th Cir.1981) (speculative conflict does not violate Sixth Amendment), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982); Foxworth v. Wainwright, 516 F.2d 1072 , 1077 n. 7 (5th Cir.1975) (“irrelevant or merely hypothetical” conflicts of interest insufficient).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Diaz v. State
See also Fiorot v. State, 641 P.2d 551, 555 (Okl.Cr.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2306 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Osborn v. Schillinger
Compare, Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F.2d 391 (5th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Son H. Fleming v. Ralph Kemp
(2×)
See also Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F.2d 391 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982); 31 Patterson v. United States, 487 F.2d 341 (5th Cir.1973) 32 (holding that Rule 52(b) applies to factual determinations in 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1982) proceedings in the district court).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Holman
Compare People v. Free (1982), 94 Ill.2d 378, 425 , cert. denied (1983), 464 U.S. 865 , 78 L.Ed.2d 175 , 104 S.Ct. 200 , and People v. Lewis (1981), 88 Ill.2d 129, 149 , cert. denied (1982), 456 U.S. 1011 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 , in which alleged errors which were held to have been waived were nonetheless considered by this court.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Garcia
(2×)
See also People v. Lewis (1981), 88 Ill.2d 129 , cert. denied (1982), 456 U.S. 1011 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Indiana Hospital
See, e.g., Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813, 818-19 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2308 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982); Robinson v. Magovern, 521 F.Supp. 842, 876-77 (W.D.Pa.1981), aff’d mem., 688 F.2d 824 (3d Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 302 , 74 L.Ed.2d 283 (1982). 80 We think it quite clear that the Court in McLain focused upon the Defendants’ general business activities for its jurisdictional inquiry rather than the specific conduct alleged to be unlawful.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc.
As Professor Areeda has observed, after Midcal, “literal compulsion is powerful evidence, if not determinative, of the existence of state policy, but is neither necessary nor sufficient for Parker immunity.” P. Areeda, Antitrust Law ¶212.5 at 62 (Supp.1982); see also Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813 , 823 n. 8 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2308 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Herman Mers, Lester Mers, Randy James Myers, Paul J. Ferrante
Compare Washington v. Strickland (requiring prejudice in cases of intrinsic ineffectiveness) with Baty v. Balkcom, 661 F.2d 391 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2307 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1308 (1982) (not requiring prejudice in cases of extrinsic ineffectiveness). 2 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McRary
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-6646.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1982.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.