green
Positive treatment
9.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Shapiro v. United States
DeMassa v. Nunez, 747 F.2d 1283 (9th Cir.1984); United States v. Furina, 707 F.2d 82 (3d Cir.1983); Standard Drywall, Inc. v. United States, 668 F.2d 156 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1973 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 , reh'g denied, 457 U.S. 1112 , 102 .S.Ct. 2917, 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982); Imperial Distributors, Inc. v. United States, 617 F.2d 892 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 891 , 101 S.Ct. 249 , 66 L.Ed.2d 116 (1980); United States v. Glassman, 533 F.2d 262 (5th Cir.1976). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hankins v. Quarterman
(2×)
See Smith v. McCotter, 786 F.2d 697, 702-03 (5th Cir.1986) (citing Baldwin v. Blackburn, 653 F.2d 942, 948 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 950 , 102 S.Ct. 2021 , 72 L.Ed.2d 475 , reh’g denied, 457 U.S. 1112 , 102 S.Ct. 2918 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982) (holding that a failure to comply with state law requirements presents a federal habeas issue only if it involves federal constitutional issues)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lehder-Rivas
(2×)
United States v. Hill, 496 F.2d 201, 203 (5th Cir.1974); see Baldwin v. Blackburn, 653 F.2d 942, 948 (5th Cir. Aug. 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1112 , 102 S.Ct. 2918 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982). a.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlos Enrique Lehder-Rivas, A/K/A Joe Lehder, United States of America v. Carlos Enrique Lehder-Rivas, A/K/A Joe Lehder, Jack Carlton Reed
(2×)
United States v. Hill, 496 F.2d 201, 203 (5th Cir.1974); see Baldwin v. Blackburn, 653 F.2d 942, 948 (5th Cir. Aug. 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1112 , 102 S.Ct. 2918 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982). 46 a.
discussed
Cited "see"
Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
(2×)
See Chatlos Systems v. National Cash Register Corp., 635 F.2d 1081 , 1085 (3d Cir.1980), ce rt. dismissed, 457 U.S. 1112 , 102 S.Ct. 2918 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982); S.M.
discussed
Cited "see"
18 Collier bankr.cas.2d 84, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,009 Koch Refining, Koch Fuels, Conoco, Inc., Mobil Oil Corporation, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Tosco Corporation, Tenneco Oil Company, Moore-Mccormick Petroleum, Gulf States Oil & Refining, Texaco, Inc., and Getty Refining and Marketing Company v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., Farmers Petroleum Cooperative, Inc., Fcx, Inc., Landmark, Inc., Land O'lakes, Inc., Midland Cooperatives, Incorporated, Mfa Oil Company, and Tennessee Farmers Cooperative
See Larsen v. Valente, 456 U.S. 228, 238-39 , 102 S.Ct. 1673, 1680 , 72 L.Ed.2d 33 reh'g denied, 457 U.S. 1111 , 102 S.Ct. 2916 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982); Havens Realty Corp. v. Coleman, 455 U.S. 363, 372-74 , 102 S.Ct. 1114, 1120-21 , 71 L.Ed.2d 214 (1982); Valley Forge, 454 U.S. at 471-72 , 102 S.Ct. at 757-58 . 86 Furthermore, appellants have not shown that they have sustained "a direct injury as a result of the defendants' conduct." Foster, 798 F.2d at 242 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc.
See Larsen v. Valente, 456 U.S. 228, 238-39 , 102 S.Ct. 1673, 1680 , 72 L.Ed.2d 33 reh’g denied, 457 U.S. 1111 , 102 S.Ct. 2916 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982); Havens Realty Corp. v. Coleman, 455 U.S. 363, 372-74 , 102 S.Ct. 1114, 1120-21 , 71 L.Ed.2d 214 (1982); Valley Forge, 454 U.S. at 471-72 , 102 S.Ct. at 757-58 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Jimmy F. Smith v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of Corrections
(2×)
See Baldwin v. Blackburn, 653 F.2d 942, 948 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 950 , 102 S.Ct. 2021 , 72 L.Ed.2d 475 reh’g dismissed, 457 U.S. 1112 , 102 S.Ct. 2918 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Continental Sand & Gravel, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee v. K & K Sand & Gravel, Inc., an Indiana Corporation, Curtis Kamminga, and Shirley Kamminga, Defendants-Counterplaintiffs-Appellants. Continental Sand & Gravel, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellant v. K & K Sand & Gravel, Inc., an Indiana Corporation, Curtis Kamminga, and Shirley Kamminga, Defendants-Counterplaintiffs-Appellees
(2×)
See Chatlos Systems, Inc. v. National Cash Register Corp., 670 F.2d 1304, 1306 (3d Cir.), cert. dis., 457 U.S. 1112 , 102 S.Ct. 2918 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Continental Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. K & K Sand & Gravel, Inc.
(2×)
See Chatlos Systems, Inc. v. National Cash Register Corp., 670 F.2d 1304, 1306 (3d Cir.), cert. dis., 457 U.S. 1112 , 102 S.Ct. 2918 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Prejean v. Blackburn
(2×)
See Baldwin v. Blackburn, 653 F.2d 942 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied 456 U.S. 950 , 102 S.Ct. 2021 , 72 L.Ed.2d 475 , rehearing denied 457 U.S. 1112 , 102 S.Ct. 2918 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Premises Known as 55 West 47th St., Ny v. United States
See also, Standard Drywall, Inc. v. U.S., 668 F.2d 156 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1973 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 reh. denied, 457 U.S. 1112 , 102 S.Ct. 2917 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982) 4 Although Sentinel Government Securities is the leading pre-indictment Rule 41(e) case in our District, its decision is based upon the reasoning and analysis set forth by the district court in Standard Drywall.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pirofsky v. United States
See Application of Campola, 543 F.Supp. 115, 118 (N.D.N.Y.1982); see also Standard Drywall, Inc. v. United States, 668 F.2d 156 , 157 n. 2 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 927 , 102 S.Ct. 1973 , 72 L.Ed.2d 442 , reh’g denied, 457 U.S. 1112, 102 S.Ct. 2917 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982) (questioning if irreparable harm could ever be shown if the movant is offered copies of the documents seized).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. Master Engraving Co.
(2×)
Wilson & Co. v. Smith Int’l, Inc., supra, 587 F.2d at 1375 ; Polycon Inds., Inc. v. Hercules, Inc., supra, 471 F.Supp. at 1325 ; see also Chatlos Sys., Inc. v. National Cash Register Corp., 670 F.2d 1304 (3d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 457 U.S. 1112 , 102 S.Ct. 2918 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982) *600 (affirming the trial court’s award on remand of breach-of-warranty damages equal to difference between fair market value of computer system as warranted and value of goods delivered).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State ex rel. Burnham v. Blackburn
(2×)
Compare, Baldwin v. Blackburn, 653 F.2d 942 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 950 , 102 S.Ct. 2021 , 72 L.Ed.2d 475 (1982), rehearing dismissed, 457 U.S. 1112 , 102 S.Ct. 2918 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Baldwin
v.
Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
v.
Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
No. 81-6301.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 1982.
Published
456 U. S. 950. Petition for rehearing dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.