green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.2 score
“the congressional intent is that an american supplier of goods, services or necessaries to a foreign vessel obtains a maritime lien in the vessel when the goods or services are supplied or performed in the united states.”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Bruce Milton Mack
But see United States v. Short, 671 F.2d 178, 181-82 (6th Cir.) (rejecting a rule that would allow challenge to a grand jury indictment for complete absence of evidence), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2932 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tramp Oil and Marine, Ltd. v. M/v \Mermaid I\"
the congressional intent is that an american supplier of goods, services or necessaries to a foreign vessel obtains a maritime lien in the vessel when the goods or services are supplied or performed in the united states.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Triplett
See United States v. Short, 671 F.2d 178, 184 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Couch
See United States v. Short, 671 F.2d 178, 183 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2932 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Miguel Carvajal
See United States v. Short, 671 F.2d 178, 183-187 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2932 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Carvajal
See United States v. Short, 671 F.2d 178, 183-187 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Avesta AB v. United States
See RKO General, Inc. v. F.C.C., 670 F.2d 215 , 226 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2931 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1331 (1982) (a hearing is required by statute when a “substantial and material question of fact is presented”).
cited
Cited "see"
Ronnie L. Curtis v. United States
See United States v. Short, 671 F.2d 178, 183 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard G. Naas
See State v. Naas, 409 So.2d 535 (La.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2933 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Tramp Oil and Marine, Ltd. v. M/v Mermaid I, Etc.
See Gulf Trading & Transport Co. v. Vessel Hoegh Shield, 658 F.2d 363 , 366 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2932 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
See State v. Naas, 409 So.2d 535 (La.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2933 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert S. Liuzzo, Louis J. Ragonese
See, e.g., United States v. Callahan, 534 F.2d 763, 766 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 830 , 97 S.Ct. 91 , 50 L.Ed.2d 94 (1976); United States v. Tager, 481 F.2d 97, 100 (10th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 914 , 94 S.Ct. 1410 , 39 L.Ed.2d 469 (1974); United States v. Eisenberg, 469 F.2d 156, 160 (8th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 992 , 93 S.Ct. 1515 , 36 L.Ed.2d 190 (1973); see contra, United States v. Short, 671 F.2d 178 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2932 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982) (Jencks Act prohibition of 'the pretrial disclosure of witness statements does n…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Howard
See, State v. Naas, 409 So.2d 535 (La.1981) cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2933 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cuevas v. Reading & Bates Corp.
See Gulf Trading & Transportation Co. v. Vessel Hoegh Shield, 658 F.2d 363 (5th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2932 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982); Restatement (Second) Conflict of Laws § 187(1) (1971). 11 The choice of law analysis discussed above with reference to Plaintiffs’ injury and death claims is entirely relevant in this context.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State Of Louisiana v. Jonathan Robertson
See also State v. Naas, 409 So. 2d 535 , 547 La. 1981 ), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S. Ct. 2933 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 ( 1982); State v. Phanor, 325 So. 2d 579, 580 ( La. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James R. Rumler
See also United States v. Short, 671 F.2d 178, 186 (6th Cir.) (purpose of Jencks Act to give defendants access at trial to statements of government's trial witnesses), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 (1982)
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas
See also United States v. Short, 671 F.2d 178, 183 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2932 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982) (grand jury utilizes probable cause standard in determining whether to issue indictment). *1089 For the reasons set forth above, defendants’ motions to dismiss the indictment will be denied.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Marshall
See, e.g., United States v. Short, 671 F.2d 178 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2932 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982); United States v. Fried, 576 F.2d 787 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 895 , 99 S.Ct. 255 , 58 L.Ed.2d 241 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donohue
See, e.g., United States v. Short, 671 F.2d *1266 178, 186 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2932 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982); United States v. Wallace, 528 F.2d 863, 865 (4th Cir.1976).
Fidelity Television, Inc.
v.
Federal Communications Commission and Multi-State Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
v.
Federal Communications Commission and Multi-State Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
No. 81-1928; No. 81-1929.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 1982.
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 216 U. S. App. D. C. 57, 670 F. 2d 215.