green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1985 ·
…the inquiry with respect to probable cause in the case of an observation of an isolated incident should focus on all of the relevant circumstances, including the element of time lapse
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Zapatero v. United States
special parole is not only an allowable sentence, but a mandatory one ...
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Thomas
the inquiry with respect to probable cause in the case of an observation of an isolated incident should focus on all of the relevant circumstances, including the element of time lapse
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Thomas
the inquiry with respect to probable cause in the case of an observation of an isolated incident should focus on all of the relevant circumstances, including the element of time lapse
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Vincent
See United States v. Beltempo, 675 F.2d 472, 478 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1135 , 102 S. Ct. 2963 , 73 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mannino
See United States v. Quintana, 673 F.2d 296, 298 (10th Cir.) (“special parole is not only an allowable sentence, but a mandatory one for distribution of heroin”), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1135 , 102 S.Ct. 2963 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1353 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 18 Perkins Road
See United States v. Beltempo, 675 F.2d 472, 477 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1135 , 102 S.Ct. 2963 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1353 (1982). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. LaMorte
See United States v. Beltempo, 675 F.2d 472, 477 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1135 , 102 S.Ct. 2963 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1353 (1982); United States v. Martino, supra, 664 F.2d at 867 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ungar
United States v. Grammatikos, 633 F.2d at 1019-20 ; see United States v. Quintana, 673 F.2d 296, 299 (10th Cir.1982) (in cases of lost evidence, courts apply pragmatic balancing test) (citing cases), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1135 , 102 S.Ct. 2963 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1353 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Singleton v. United States
See Jennings v. United States, 431 A.2d 552, 555 (D.C.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1135 , 102 S.Ct. 2964 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1353 (1982). 2 Appellant argues that the government introduced no evidence to support the inference that appellant intended to rob complainant, because appellant did not demand money or announce his intent to rob, citing Dowtin v. United States, 330 A.2d 749, 750 (D.C.1975) (defendant announced, “This is it, a stick-up”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph A. Travisano
(2×)
See United States v. Beltempo, 675 F.2d 472, 477 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1135 , 102 S.Ct. 2963 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1353 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sun Myung Moon and Takeru Kamiyama
(2×)
See United States v. Beltempo, 675 F.2d 472, 481 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1135 , 102 S.Ct. 2936 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1353 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John H. Ogden, Jr.
See United States v. Udziela, 671 F.2d 995, 998-99 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 2964 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1353 (1982); United States v. Singer, 660 F.2d 1295, 1302-03 (8th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1156 , 102 S.Ct. 1030 , 71 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982); United States v. Samango, 607 F.2d 877 (9th Cir.1979); United States v. Chanen, 549 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825 , 98 S.Ct. 72 , 54 L.Ed.2d 83 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Travis v. Village of Dobbs Ferry
Compare Sgro v. United States, 287 U.S. 206 , 53 S.Ct. 138 , 77 L.Ed. 260 (1932) (undercover alcohol purchase at hotel twenty-one days prior to application for warrant too remote in time), with United States v. Beltempo, 675 F.2d 472, 476-79 (2d Cir.1982)(search warrant not stale when object sought was trace sample of heroin observed spilled on rug fifty-two *750 days prior to issuance of warrant), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1135 , 102 S.Ct. 2963 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1353 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gerard Wagner, Michael Canale Tammie Canale Thomas Brewer Donald Howard Shawna O'Leary Leo Talback Arthur Villa and David Keays
Compare Sgro v. United States, 287 U.S. 206 , 53 S.Ct. 138 , 77 L.Ed. 260 (1932) (undercover alcohol purchase at hotel twenty-one days prior to application for warrant too remote in time), with United States v. Beltempo, 675 F.2d 472, 476-79 (2d Cir.) (search warrant not stale when object sought was trace sample of heroin observed spilled on rug fifty-two days prior to issuance of warrant), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1135 , 102 S.Ct. 2963 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1353 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Brown
See, e.g., United States v. Quintana, 673 F.2d 296, 298 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1135 , 102 S.Ct. 2963 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1353 (1982); Rousan v. United States, 668 F.2d 1006 (8th Cir.1982); United States v. Hawkins, 788 F.2d 200, 204-05 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 850 , 107 S.Ct. 176 , 93 L.Ed. 2d 112 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sugar
See United States v. Perry, 643 F.2d 38, 50 (2d Cir.) (three year old information, corroborated by recent information, not stale where ongoing practice involved), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 835 , 102 S.Ct. 138 , 70 L.Ed.2d 115 (1981); see also United States v. Beltempo, 675 F.2d 472, 477 (2d Cir.) (“a 52 day lapse would not vitiate probable cause in an ongoing scheme”), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1135 , 102 S.Ct. 2963 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1353 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Petschen
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-6089.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2) · S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.