green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
See Sikes v. McGraw-Edison Co., 665 F.2d 731, 733-34 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1108 , 102 S.Ct. 3488 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1369 (1982); but see Richter v. Westab, Inc., 529 F.2d 896, 900 (6th Cir.1976) (holding that any product idea that would be obvious upon the product’s release is not a trade secret); see also Hudson Hotels Corp. v. Choice Hotels Intern., 995 F.2d 1173, 1178 (2d Cir.1993) (comparing cases and noting that “[i]n the premarketing stage, the question whether a marketing concept or new product idea can constitute a trade secret is murkier.”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David M. Dale, United States of America v. Michelle Ashton, United States of America v. Martin Segal, United States of America v. Automated Data Management, Inc., United States of America v. Terence Sweeney
See United States v. Ruppel, 666 F.2d 261, 271 (5th Cir. Unit A), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1107 , 102 S.Ct. 3487 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1369 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dale
See United States v. Ruppel, 666 F.2d 261, 271 (5th Cir. Unit A), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1107 , 102 S.Ct. 3487 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1369 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David J. Payne
See United States v. Ruppel, 666 F.2d 261, 274 (5th Cir.1982) (where the district judge charged the jury on the presumption of innocence at the beginning of the trial, referred back to these instructions at the outset of his final charge, and defense counsel referred to the presumption during closing argument, court was “unwilling to believe that the jury retired to deliberate less than fully aware of the presumption of innocence”), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1107 , 102 S.Ct. 3487 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1369 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Forsyth v. State
See United State v. Ruppel, 666 F.2d 261, 271 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1107 , 102 S.Ct. 3487 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1369 (1982); see also United States v. Phillips, 540 F.2d 319, 326 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1000 , 97 S.Ct. 530 , 50 L.Ed.2d 611 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Louisiana v. Testbank
Akron Corp. v. M/T Cantigny, 5 Cir.1983 (per curiam), 706 F.2d 151 , 153; accord Kingston Shipping Co. v. Roberts, 11 Cir.1982 (per curiam) (summary calendar), 667 F.2d 34 , 35, cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1108 , 102 S.Ct. 3487 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1369 ; see also Vicksburg Towing Co. v. Mississippi Marine Transport Co., 5 Cir.1980, 609 F.2d 176 ; Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. M/V Bayou Lacombe, 5 Cir.1979, 597 F.2d 469 ; Dick Meyers Towing Service, Inc. v. United States, 5 Cir.1978, 577 F.2d 1023 , cert. denied, 1979, 440 U.S. 908 , 99 S.Ct. 1215 , 59 L.Ed.2d 455 . 5 The factual situation in the …
discussed
Cited "see"
Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. M/V Testbank
Akron Corp. v. M/T Cantigny, 5 Cir.1983 (per curiam), 706 F.2d 151, 153 ; accord Kingston Shipping Co. v. Roberts, 11 Cir.1982 (per curiam) (summary calendar), 667 F.2d 34 , 35, cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1108 , 102 S.Ct. 3487 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1369 ; see also Vicksburg Towing Co. v. Mississippi Marine Transport Co., 5 Cir.1980, 609 F.2d 176 ; Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. M/V Bayou Lacombe, 5 Cir.1979, 597 F.2d 469 ; Dick Meyers Towing Service, Inc. v. United States, 5 Cir.1978, 577 F.2d 1023 , cert. denied, 1979, 440 U.S. 908 , 99 S.Ct. 1215 , 59 L.Ed.2d 455 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rex C. Cauble, Individually and Doing Business as Cauble Enterprises
See United States v. Ruppel, 666 F.2d 261 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 3487 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1369 (1982); United States v. Hamm, 659 F.2d 624 (5th Cir. 1981) (en banc); United States v. Hawkins, 658 F.2d 279 (5th Cir. 1981). 2 . (a) It shall be unlawful for any person who has received any income derived, directly or indirectly, from a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt in which such person has participated as a principal within the meaning of section 2, title 18, United States Code, to use or invest, directly or indirectly, any part of such in…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aikens v. Debow
See also Kingston Shipping Co., Inc. v. Roberts, 667 F.2d 34 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, ABC Containerline N.V. v. Kingston Shipping Co., 458 U.S. 1108 , 102 S.Ct. 3487 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1369 (1982) (holding that vessel owners could not recover economic losses resulting from delayed passage of vessel, where such delays were allegedly caused by defendant’s negligence); DeVille-gas v. Quality Roofing, Inc., No. CV920294190S, 1993 WL 515671 at *3 (Conn.Super.Ct.1993) (denying recovery of economic damages and stating that the "long established common law rule in this state is that in the absence o…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mickens
See also, United States v. Ruppel, 666 F.2d 261, 272 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1107 , 102 S.Ct. 3487 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1369 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vest
See, e.g., United States v. Ruppel, 666 F.2d 261, 271 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1107 , 102 S.Ct. 3487 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1369 (1982) (such a purpose held to be a self-protective purpose permitted under § 2511(2)(d)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackie Vance Lowery v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
(2×)
Miracle at 1275 ; United States v. Jamison, 505 F.2d 407, 415 (D.C.Cir.1974) 16 In Miracle, this Court considered a defendant's free exercise of his right to a new trial, like a right to appeal, to be protected from constraining fears of retaliation, id. at 1272, 1276-77; compare Blackledge v. Perry, 417 U.S. 21 , 94 S.Ct. 2098 , 40 L.Ed.2d 628 (1974); Jackson at 148-49 ; Hardwick at 302-03 with United States v. Goodwin, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 2485 , 73 L.Ed.2d 74 (1982); Ehl v. Estelle, 656 F.2d 166 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1459 , 71 L.Ed.2d 669 (1982); compare…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ruppel
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-2016.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 1982.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.