green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Savchenko
See United States v. Howard-Arias, 679 F.2d 363 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 874 , 103 S.Ct. 165 , 74 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Olaf Peter Juda Raymond Edward Missell Anthony Burg Frans Gustaaf Van Der Hoeven and Christopher Dean Paris
See United States v. Howard-Arias, 679 F.2d 363, 369-72 (4th Cir.) (noting that such a limitation was eliminated by a predecessor statute, 21 U.S.C. § 955a), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 874 , 103 S.Ct. 165 , 74 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Farmer
See United States v. Howard-Arias, 679 F.2d 363, 366 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 874 , 103 S.Ct. 165 , 74 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Elic L. Gilliam, United States of America v. Roy Lee Gilliam
(2×)
See United States v. Howard-Arias, 679 F.2d 363, 365-66 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 874 , 103 S.Ct. 165 , 74 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Carlson v. State
See Barber v. State, 628 S.W.2d 104, 111 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1981, pet. ref’d), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 874 , 103 S.Ct. 164 , 74 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernest Mendel and Albert Mendel & Son, Incorporated
See United States v. Howard-Arias, 679 F.2d *167 363, 366 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 874 , 103 S.Ct. 165 , 74 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Doe, a Juvenile
See United States v. Howard-Arias, 679 F.2d 363, 367 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 874 , 103 S.Ct. 165 , 74 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982) (appellant’s claim that the court was required to divulge the contents of the probation officer’s sentencing recommendation is meritless because Rule 32(c)(3)(A) explicitly authorizes otherwise). 1 RECOMMENDATION OF PLACEMENT IN CALIFORNIA FACILITY John Doe argues that the district court committed reversible error by recommending that he be placed in a California treatment facility.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pinto-Mejia
Accord, United States v. Howard-Arias, 679 F.2d 363, 371 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 165 , 74 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982). 42 Our review of the language and history of Sec. 955a et seq. persuades us that, assuming that the RICARDO was stateless, Congress intended these sections to reach the conduct of the defendants in this case.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pinto-Mejia
Accord, United States v. Howard-Arias, 679 F.2d 363, 371 (4th C3r.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 165 , 74 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pedford v. State
Henson v. State, 683 S.W.2d 702 (Tex.Cr.App.1984); see also Barber v. State, 628 S.W.2d 104, 111 (Tex.App.1982, pet. ref’d), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 874 , 103 S.Ct. 164 , 74 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982) (where prosecutor said “we don’t know” what defendant planned to do with victim, inference was too remote to be error); Fugitt v. State, 623 S.W.2d 471 (Tex.App.1981, pet ref’d) (where the comment of prosecutor that “We’ll never know” what the defendant meant by his threat to the robbery victims was viewed by the court as merely an invitation to speculate on what might have happened).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eladio Alvarez-Mena
See also United States v. Howard-Arias, 679 F.2d 363, 369-71 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 874 , 103 S.Ct. 165 , 74 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982); United States v. Marino-Garcia, 679 F.2d 1373 , 1379 & n. 10 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1114 , 103 S.Ct. 748 , 74 L.Ed.2d 967 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Farber
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-5162.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.