green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Elic L. Gilliam, United States of America v. Roy Lee Gilliam
(2×)
See United States v. Arias, 678 F.2d 1202, 1205 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 218 , 74 L.Ed.2d 173 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bevans
See United States v. Ochoa-Sanchez, 676 F.2d 1283,1289 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 911 , 103 S.Ct. 219 , 74 L.Ed.2d 174 (1982); Hendricks, 476 F.2d at 779 ; United States v. Hoppe, 645 F.2d 630, 633 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 849 , 102 S.Ct. 170 , 70 L.Ed.2d 138 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harvey I. Silverman
See United States v. Strauss, 678 F.2d 886, 890 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 911 , 103 S.Ct. 218 , 74 L.Ed.2d 173 (1982). 3.
cited
Cited "see"
Robert HADDAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
See United States v. Patterson, 678 F.2d 774, 778 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 219 , 74 L.Ed.2d 174 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
TWN, INC. v. Michel
See also United States v. Patterson, 678 F.2d 774, 778-79 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 911 , 103 S.Ct. 219 , 74 L.Ed.2d 174 (1982); United States v. Senak, 527 F.2d 129, 140-41 (7th Cir.1975), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 907 , 96 S.Ct. 1500 , 47 L.Ed.2d 758 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rosa Olivera Rivera, United States of America v. Alfonso Rivera-Farias, United States of America v. Maria Diaz, United States of America v. Francisca Lara, United States of America v. Rosendo Cisneros
See, e.g., United States v. Ochoa-Sanchez, 676 F.2d 1283, 1288 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 911 , 103 S.Ct. 219 , 74 L.Ed.2d 174 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel W. O'connell, A/K/A Edward Smith, United States of America v. Gregory J. Cooke, United States of America v. Patrick Basil Collier, United States of America v. William R. Patterson, Ii, United States of America v. Richard Allen St. Cyr, A/K/A Dexter
See, e.g., United States v. Auerbach, 682 F.2d 735, 738 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 911 , 103 S.Ct. 219 , 74 L.Ed.2d 174 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. O'Connell
See, e.g., United States v. Auerbach, 682 F.2d 735, 738 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 911 , 103 S.Ct. 219 , 74 L.Ed.2d 174 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Israel Valles-Valencia, United States of America v. Ricardo Vigil Bustamante, United States of America v. Guillermo Soto-Leal
This court has recognized two exceptions to the Lubin rule: (1) when an indictment refers to unindicted or unnamed persons and the government presents “substantial evidence that the defendant conspired with those persons,” Wright, 742 F.2d at 1224 ; see also United States v. Patterson, 678 F.2d 774, 781 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 911 , 103 S.Ct. 219 , 74 L.Ed.2d 174 (1982); (2) when the co-defendant’s escape from the conspiracy charge is not equivalent to an acquittal on the merits, as when the jury is hung, United States v. Sangmeister, 685 F.2d 1124, 1126-27 (9th Cir.1982), or w…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Franke Hoheb
See, e.g., United States v. Patterson, 678 F.2d 774, 781 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 911 , 103 S.Ct. 219 , 74 L.Ed.2d 174 (1982); United States v. Albert, 675 F.2d 712, 713 (5th Cir.1982); United States v. Williams, 503 F.2d 50, 54 (6th Cir.1974); United States v. Shuford, 454 F.2d 772, 779-80 (4th Cir.1971); cases collected in Annot., 19 A.L.R.4th 192 (1983). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Allah v. State
See also United States v. Ochoa-Sanchez, 676 F.2d 1283 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 911 , 103 S.Ct. 219 , 74 L.Ed.2d 174 (1982); Lofton v. Wainwright, 620 F.2d 74 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Albert Dupuy, United States of America v. Christie Buzard, United States of America v. Juan Antonio Tercero
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Patterson, 678 F.2d 774, 778 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 911 , 103 S.Ct. 219 , 74 L.Ed.2d 174 (1982). 40 In this case the district court based its decision to exclude on a finding that the proffered witnesses had not found the gesture of Garcia to be suggestive.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Waxman
v.
City of Chicago
v.
City of Chicago
No. 82-391.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1982.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.