green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.6 score
“the exercise of discretion ... will be judged by the amount of time the jury deliberates in light of the nature of the case and evidence”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Ramseur
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
the exercise of discretion ... will be judged by the amount of time the jury deliberates in light of the nature of the case and evidence
discussed
Cited "see"
Dailey v. State
(2×)
See Riley v. State, 413 So.2d 1173 (Fla.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 317 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hartman v. Duffy
See Hill v. Western Electric, 672 F.2d 381 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982); Goodman v. Lukens Steel, 777 F.2d 113 (3d Cir.), aff'd, 482 U.S. 656 , 107 S.Ct. 2617 , 96 L.Ed.2d 572 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Fleet Aerospace Corporation v. Mark Holderman
See Hill v. Western Electric Co., 672 F.2d 381, 387 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
See, Berryhill v. State, 249 Ga. 442 , 291 S.E.2d 685 (1982), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 317 , 74 L.Ed.2d 293 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wilt
See State v. McDowell, 312 N.W.2d 301 (N.D.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Uzzell v. Friday
See Hill v. Western Electric Co., 672 F.2d 381, 387 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982); Brink v. Da Lesio, 667 F.2d 420 , 428-29 (4th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chromalloy American Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. B. Wallace Fischmann, an Individual, B. Wallace Fischmann, an Individual, Counterclaimant-Appellant v. Chromalloy American Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Counterdefendant- Harvey Fischmann, Joseph D. Kruss, and Dashe, Inc., Doing Business as Scorpion, Inc., Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants v. B. Wallace Fischmann, Involuntary v. Chromalloy American Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant- Counterclaimant-Appellee
See Span-Deck, Inc. v. Fab-Con, Inc., 677 F.2d 1237 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982); cf. Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Mestere, 701 F.2d 1365 , 1372-73 & n. 12 (11th Cir.1983), aff'g 517 F.Supp. 52 (S.D.Fla.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chromalloy American Corp. v. Fischmann
See Span-Deck, Inc. v. Fab-Con, Inc., 677 F.2d 1237 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982); cf. Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Mestere, 701 F.2d 1365 , 1372-73 & n. 12 (11th Cir.1983), aff’g 517 F.Supp. 52 (S.D.Fla. 1981).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Fridley
See State v. McDowell, 312 N.W.2d 301, 305 (N.D.1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. DiFrisco
(2×)
See Ramseur, supra , 106 N.J. at 303, 524 A. 2d 188 ; see also Berryhill v. State, 249 Ga. 442 , 291 S.E. 2d 685, 694 (holding that deliberations of more than ten hours in capital case were insufficient), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 317 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 293 (1982); State v. Thompson, 516 So. 2d 349, 355-56 (La. 1987) (holding that trial court's instructions to capital jury to continue deliberations after jury indicated in open court that it was deadlocked eleven to one but wanted to return to jury room was not abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 871 , 109 S.Ct. 180 , 102 L.Ed.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelaita v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
See also Hill v. Western Electric Co., 672 F.2d 381, 387 (4th Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelaita v. Director
See also Hill v. Western Electric Co., 672 F.2d 381, 387 (4th Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982). 10 Kelaita argues that the last responsible employer rule is not a rule of substantive law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael McCarthy Arthur Waskow v. Richard G. Kleindienst
(2×)
See, e.g., Hill v. Western Electric Co., 672 F.2d 381, 387 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982); Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh, 538 F.2d 991, 995-96 (3d Cir.1976); Developments in the Law--Class Actions, 89 Harv.L.R. 1318, 1491-92 (1976). 27 On the other hand, serious drawbacks to the maintenance of a class action are presented where initial determinations, such as the issue of liability vel non, turn upon highly individualized facts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Peltzman
v.
Federal Maritime Commission
v.
Federal Maritime Commission
No. 82-181.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of New Jersey (1)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed as a seaman granted. Certiorari denied.