green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.9 score
“this section is designed to prevent unscrupulous employers from discharging or harassing plan participants in order to keep them from realizing their vested pension rights”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tracey v. Heublein, Inc.
erisa's purpose is to secure guaranteed pension payments to participants by insuring the honest administration of financially sound plans.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co.
this section is designed to prevent unscrupulous employers from discharging or harassing plan participants in order to keep them from realizing their vested pension rights
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Cortis
We reasoned, “There was no showing whether the defendant was, in fact, ever residing at the Jackson Street address, had a key for entry to that address, rented or owned the property, exercised any type of control over the property, or kept any clothing or personal belongings at the property.” Id. at 703, 320 N. W.2d at 111 .
discussed
Cited "see"
John S. Morse v. Edmund A. Stanley, Jr., Victor Simonte, Jr., Franz Von Ziegesar and Carl R. Pite, Michael Don Romacho v. Edmund A. Stanley, Jr., Victor Simonte, Jr., Franz Von Ziegesar and Carl R. Pite, Robert D. Cohen v. Edmund A. Stanley, Jr., Victor Simonte, Jr., Franz Von Ziegesar and Carl R. Pite
See Pompano v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc., 680 F.2d 911, 915 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1039 , 103 S.Ct. 454 , 74 L.Ed.2d 607 (1982); see also Fine v. Semet, 699 F.2d 1091 (11th Cir.1983). 16 B.
cited
Cited "see"
Morse v. Stanley
See Pompano v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc., 680 F.2d 911, 915 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1039 , 103 S.Ct. 454 , 74 L.Ed.2d 607 (1982); see also Fine v. Semet, 699 F.2d 1091 (11th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan
The plan must furnish each participant with a summary plan description containing such information as the names and addresses of the administrator and trustees, the eligibility requirements, and the circumstances that may result in loss of benefits. 29 U.S.C. §§ 1021 (a)(1), 1022(b); 29 C.F.R. § 2520 .104b-2 (1982); see Pompano v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc., 680 F.2d 911, 914 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 454 , 74 L.Ed.2d 607 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fine v. Semet
(2×)
See Pompano v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc., 680 F.2d 911, 914 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 454 , 74 L.Ed.2d 607 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brassord v. Continental Casualty Co.
See also Pompano v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc., 680 F.2d 911, 915 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1039 , 103 S.Ct. 454 , 74 L.Ed.2d 607 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Romacho v. Stanley
See also Pompano v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc., 680 F.2d 911, 914 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 454 , 74 L.Ed.2d 607 (1982); Hackett v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 486 F.Supp. 1357, 1362-63 (D.Md.1980). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cohen v. Stanley
See also Pompano v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc., 680 F.2d 911, 915 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 454 , 74 L.Ed.2d 607 (1982); Smith v. CMTA-IAM Pension Trust, 654 F.2d 650, 654 (9th Cir.1981); Paris v. Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of Howard B.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
J. L. Lester & Son, Inc.
v.
Smith, Administratrix, Estate of Smith
v.
Smith, Administratrix, Estate of Smith
No. 82-636.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. Alabama (1) · D. Connecticut (1)
Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.