In re Hopfmann, 459 U.S. 1033 (1982). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Hopfmann, 459 U.S. 1033 (1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mery v. Universal Savings Ass'n (txsd, 1990-05-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Mery v. Universal Savings Ass'n
S.D. Tex. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 873 (11th Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 , reh’g denied, 459 U.S. 1059 , 103 S.Ct. 477 , 74 L.Ed.2d 624 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Cooling Systems and Flexibles, Inc., a California Corporation, Plaintiff v. Stuart Radiator, Inc., Stuart-Western, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jartech, Inc. v. Clancy, 666 F.2d 403, 407 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 879 , 103 S.Ct. 175 , 74 L.Ed.2d 143 , reh’g denied, 459 U.S. 1059 , 103 S.Ct. 477 , 74 L.Ed.2d 624 , second reh’g denied, 463 U.S. 1237 , 104 S.Ct. 33 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1453 (1983); cf. See v. Durang, 711 F.2d 141, 144 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (weak argument on substantial similarity not so frivolous as to justify an award of attorneys’ fees).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Arends v. Eurobank & Trust Co.
D.P.R. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 , reh. den., 459 U.S. 1059 , 103 S.Ct. 477 , 74 L.Ed.2d 624 (1982) (describes formula for FDIC decision between liquidation and P & A Agreement); Federal Deposit Ins.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Woodstone Ltd. Partnership
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 865 (11th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982), reh. denied 459 U.S. 1059 , 103 S.Ct. 477 , 74 L.Ed.2d 624 (1982); Langley v. FDIC, 484 U.S. 86, 90 , 108 S.Ct. 396, 401 , 98 L.Ed.2d 340 (1987). 3 Lately, however, federal regulators have shown that they do not always need to act swiftly and immediately and that they can in fact act in a manner that will allow them a substantial amount of time for inspection.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Hopfmann
No. 82-610.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 1982.
459 U.S. 1033
Published

Application for injunction, presented to Justice Brennan, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of prohibition and/or mandamus and/or injunction denied.