green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Commonwealth v. Wilcox
But see United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194, 202-203 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 (1982) (expressing uneasiness with approach followed by other Federal courts and providing procedure whereby replacement and absentee grand jurors are given transcript of missed proceedings as well as an opportunity to recall witnesses for questioning).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Roe v. Antle
ausal connection may be demonstrated by evidence of circumstances that justify an inference of retaliatory motive, such as protected conduct closely followed by adverse action.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sanchez
See United States v. Gianni, 678 F.2d 956, 959-60 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Doan v. Seagate Technology, Inc.
See Burrus v. United Telephone Co., 683 F.2d 339, 342 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert S, FURR, Leslie Woosley, Bernard E. Ozinga, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant-Appellant
See Burrus v. United Telephone Co., 683 F.2d 339, 342 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Furr v. Seagate Technology
See Burrus v. United Telephone Co., 683 F.2d 339, 342 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Franklin D.B. Jackson v. Henry G. Cisneros, Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development
See id. (affirming trial court's determination, after trial to the court, that Title VII plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case of retaliation, "[g]iven the length of time [, three years,] between the filing of charges and the termination").
discussed
Cited "see"
Berry v. General Motors Corp.
See Burns v. United Telephone Co., 683 F.2d 339, 343 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982) (protected conduct closely followed by adverse action can demonstrate a causal connection).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Lacend
See United States v. Gianni, 678 F.2d 956, 958, 959-960 (11th Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1071 (1982), and United States v. Panitz, 907 F.2d 1267, 1268-1270, 1272-1273 (1st Cir. 1990), where comparable undercover operations withstood constitutional scrutiny.
cited
Cited "see"
Ronald C. Taylor, Cross-Appellee v. Coors Biotech Products Company, Cross-Appellant
See Burrus v. United Telephone Co. of Kansas, Inc., 683 F.2d 339, 343 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert J. Austin, D/B/A Austin Roofing v. State Industrial Insurance System Laury M. Lewis, General Manager
See O’Connor v. Nevada, 686 F.2d 749, 750 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Government of the Virgin Islands v. A., Leonard
See United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194, 203 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed.2d 634 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lorenzo Gonzalez, A/K/A \Tito
See United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194, 199 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed.2d 634 (1982); Boscia, 573 F.2d at 833 (noting that “considerations of judicial economy weigh heavily against separate trials.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Austin v. State Industrial Insurance System
See O’Connor v. State, 686 F.2d 749, 750 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982) (state bar found to be a state agency entitled to eleventh amendment immunity even though its funds are from attorney dues and not from the state general fund).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gigante
See Eaby v. Richmond, 561 F.Supp. 131 (E.D.Pa.1983), and United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed.2d 634 (1982), which hold that there need not be an associational element apart from the pattern of racketeering activities themselves.
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Townley Engineering & Manufacturing Company
See McClatchy Newspapers v. Central Valley Typographical Union, 686 F.2d 731 , 734 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Townley Engineering & Manufacturing Co.
See McClatchy Newspapers v. Central Valley Typographical Union, 686 F.2d 731 , 734 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur J. Greer
See United States v. Gianni, 678 F.2d 956, 958-59 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Timothy Malone v. John Avenenti, Warden Robert Corbin, Attorney General
(2×)
See Cel-A-Pack v. California Agricultural Labor Relations Board, 680 F.2d 664 , 668 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State ex rel. Corbin v. Tolleson
See McClatchy Newspapers v. Central Valley Typographical Union No. 46, International Typographical Union, 686 F.2d 731, 734 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steinmetz
See United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed.2d 634 (1982); United States v. Dickins, supra. Finally, defendants maintain that a severance should be granted because their interests are irreconcilably opposed to each other.
discussed
Cited "see"
San Diego Committee Against Registration and the Draft (Card), Plaintiff v. The Governing Board of the Grossmont Union High School District
(2×)
See Cel-A-Pak v. California Agricultural Labor Relations Board, 680 F.2d 664, 667 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982) (Rule 3(c) mandates liberality in determining compliance with Rule 4(a)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Laxalt v. McClatchy
See McClatchy Newspapers d/b/a The Sacramento Bee v. Central Valley Typographical Union No. 46, 686 F.2d 731 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982); The Sacramento Bee, published by McClatchy Newspapers v. United States District Court, 656 F.2d 477 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2257 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. University of Nevada
See NRS 41.031(3); See O’Connor v. Nevada, 686 F.2d 749, 750 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Linda Love v. Re/max of America, Inc.
See Burrus v. United Telephone Co., 683 F.2d 339 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lanier v. Old Republic Insurance
See also McClatchy Newspapers v. Central Valley Typographical Union No. 46, 686 F.2d 731 , 734 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982); Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild, Local 35 v. Washington Post Co., 442 F.2d 1234, 1238-39 (D.C.Cir. 1971); American Centennial Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Juan Delgado, Emilio Albelo, Juan Carlos Riverol, Tomas Raul Hernandez
United States v. Tamargo, 672 F.2d 887, 889 (11th Cir.) (internal citations omitted), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 864 , 103 S.Ct. 141 , 74 L.Ed.2d 119 (1982); see also United States v. Gianni, 678 F.2d 956, 959 (11th Cir.) (specifying that a defendant’s assent may be inferred from acts furthering the conspiracy’s purpose), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bertoli
For instance, some circuits had held that "[o]ne conducts the activities of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering when (1) one is enabled to commit the predicate offenses solely by virtue of [one's] position in the enterprise or involvement in or control over the affairs of the enterprise, or (2) the predicate offenses are related to the activities of that enterprise.” United States v. Scotto, 641 F.2d 47, 54 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 961 , 101 S.Ct. 3109 , 69 L.Ed.2d 971 (1981); see also United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194, 200 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SE PA. v. Casey
See, e.g., McClatchy Newspapers v. Central Valley Typographical Union, 686 F.2d 731 , 734 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982); see generally 7 James W.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stone v. City & County of San Francisco
NLRB v. Beer Drivers & Salesmen’s Local Union No. 888, 536 F.2d 1268, 1276 (9th Cir.1976); see also McClatchy Newspapers v. Central Valley Typographical Union No. 46, 686 F.2d 731, 735 (9th Cir.) (“[A]n appeal of a contempt order issued to force compliance with an injunction should not divest the [district] court of jurisdiction to modify that order to achieve the same enforcement purpose.”), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bloome
See also United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194, 203-04 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed.2d 634 (1982); United States v. Pacelli, 521 F.2d *549 135, 149 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1106 , 47 L.Ed.2d 314 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Chester
(2×)
See also United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed.2d 634 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Solomon Philip Panitz, United States of America v. Andrew Stewart Baumwald
See, e.g., United States v. Gianni, 678 F.2d 956, 959-60 (11th Cir.) (government’s delivery and sale of marijuana to willing buyers for large sums of cash does not constitute outrageous conduct), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gussin v. Shockey
See, e.g., United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed.2d 634 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
cadc 1989
Another Court of Appeals restated the Scotto test in United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984), finding the demands of Sec. 1962(c) satisfied when "the defendant's position in the enterprise facilitated his commission of the racketeering acts" and "the predicate acts had some effect on the lawful enterprise." Id. at 1333; see also United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194, 200 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed.2d 634 (1982) (following Scotto ). 43 We decline to adopt a more restricti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hill v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company
See, e.g., Burrus v. United Telephone Co. of Kansas, 683 F.2d 339, 342 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982); Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337, 1344-45 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hill v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad
See, e.g., Burrus v. United Telephone Co. of Kansas, 683 F.2d 339, 342 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982); Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337, 1344-45 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yellow Bus Lines, Inc. v. Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union 639
Another Court of Appeals restated the Scotto test in United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984), finding the demands of § 1962(c) satisfied when “the defendant’s position in the enterprise facilitated his commission of the racketeering acts” and “the predicate acts had some effect on the lawful enterprise.” Id. at 1333; see also United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194, 200 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed.2d 634 (1982) (following Scotto).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fowle v. C & C Cola
See, e.g., Jayasinghe v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 760 F.2d 132, 135 (7th Cir.1985) (“the policies behind the McDonnell Douglas template would best be served by limiting the prima facie showing of ‘qualification’ to relative objective qualifications.”) These courts have reasoned that evaluations that a plaintiff lacks these qualities are more susceptible of abuse and more likely to mask pretext. “[S]ubjective decision making provides an opportunity for unlawful discrimination.” Burrus v. United Telephone Co., 683 F.2d 339, 342 (10th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 107…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilson F. Fowle v. C & C Cola
See, e.g., Jayasinghe v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 760 F.2d 132, 135 (7th Cir.1985) ("the policies behind the McDonnell Douglas template would best be served by limiting the prima facie showing of 'qualification' to relative objective qualifications.") These courts have reasoned that evaluations that a plaintiff lacks these qualities are more susceptible of abuse and more likely to mask pretext. "[S]ubjective decision making provides an opportunity for unlawful discrimination." Burrus v. United Telephone Co., 683 F.2d 339, 342 (10th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
cadc 1988
See also United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194, 200 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed.2d 634 (1982) (following Scotto ). 42 We decline to adopt a more restrictive standard than that enunciated in Cauble and Scotto.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Yellow Bus Lines, Inc. v. Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union 639
See also United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194, 200 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 634 (1982) (following Scotto).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Biaggi
See, e.g., United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194, 200 (3d Cir.) (“The fact that the union was harmed rather than benefitted [by its president’s acceptance of bribes to overlook collective bargaining violations] does not remove the conduct from RICO's ambit.”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed.2d 634 (1982); United States v. Webster, 669 F.2d 185, 186-87 (4th Cir.1982) (on rehearing, reversing position on this issue taken in United States v. Webster, 639 F.2d 174 (4th Cir.1981), and holding that “The proper question should have been whether the affairs of the [e…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. J. Michael Robilotto, Louis D. Spagnola and Anthony v. Civitello, Defendants
See United States v. LeRoy, 687 F.2d 610, 617 (2d Cir.1982) (section 1962(c) “does not require that predicate acts be in furtherance of the enterprise”), cer t. denied, 459 U.S. 1174 , 103 S.Ct. 823 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1983); see also United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194, 200 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed.2d 634 (1982); cf. United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1332-33 (5th Cir.1983) (adding requirement that predicate acts had some effect on the enterprise), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Giglio v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
See, e.g., O’Connor v. Nevada, 507 F.Supp. 546 (D.Nev.1981), aff'd, 686 F.2d 749 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982) (Nevada Supreme Court was dismissed from action seeking prospective injunctive relief on eleventh amendment grounds; Ex parte Young exception did not apply since the Nevada Supreme Court justices were not state officials but rather were “arms of the state itself”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wrenn v. Gould
See also Burrus v. United Telephone Co., 683 F.2d 339, 343 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982); Smalley v. City of Eatonville, 640 F.2d 765, 769 (5th Cir.1981); Womack v. Munson, 619 F.2d 1292, 1296 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 979 , 101 S.Ct. 1513 , 67 L.Ed.2d 814 (1981); Grant v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 622 F.2d 43, 46 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca6 1987
See also Burrus v. United Telephone Co., 683 F.2d 339, 343 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982); Smalley v. City of Eatonville, 640 F.2d 765, 769 (5th Cir.1981); Womack v. Munson, 619 F.2d 1292, 1296 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 979 , 101 S.Ct. 1513 , 67 L.Ed.2d 814 (1981); Grant v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 622 F.2d 43, 46 (2d Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jim Forno's Continental Motors, Inc. v. Subaru Distributors Corp.
See also United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194, 200 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed.2d 634 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Artists Corp. & L.P.A.A., Marcello Danon v. La Cage Aux Folles, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Cel-A-Pak v. California Agricultural Labor Relations Board, 680 F.2d 664, 668-69 (9th Cir.1982) (no significant new evidence in motion), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 491 , 74 L.Ed.2d 633 (1982); National Industries, 677 F.2d at 1270 (insufficient response to a summary judgment motion).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas E. Byrd
See also United States v. Provenzano, 688 F.2d 194, 203 (3rd Cir.1982), cert. denied 459 U.S. 1071 , 103 S.Ct. 492 , 74 L.Ed.2d 634 (1982) (Kastigar hearing unnecessary where government’s documents demonstrated prior knowledge of the evidence used against the defendant).
Howard
v.
Central of Georgia Railroad Co.
v.
Central of Georgia Railroad Co.
No. 82-670.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 6, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: D. New Mexico (1)
Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.