green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kelley
(2×)
See United States v. Steed, 674 F.2d 284, 289 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 829 , 103 S.Ct. 67 , 74 L.Ed.2d 68 (1982); Fed.R.Civ.P. 50.
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Rainge
See People v. Whitlow (1982), 89 Ill. 2d 322 , 433 N.E.2d 629 , cert. denied (1982), 459 U.S. 830 , 74 L.
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Schulz
See People v. Whitlow (1982), 89 Ill. 2d 322, 341 , 433 N.E.2d 629 , cert. denied (1982), 459 U.S. 830 , 74 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Browers
See generally United States v. Grabinski, 674 F. 2d 677, 679-80 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 829 , 103 S.Ct. 67 , 74 L.Ed.2d 67 (1982); United States v. Leppo, 634 F.2d 101, 104-05 (3d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brian A. Moller-Butcher, M.E.S. Equipment, Inc.
See United States v. Grabinski, 674 F.2d 677, 680 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 829 , 103 S.Ct. 67 , 74 L.Ed.2d 67 (1982); United States v. Mehrmanesh, 652 F.2d 766, 768-70 (9th Cir.1980); cf. United States v. MacDonald, 435 U.S. 850, 856-61 , 98 S.Ct. 1547, 1550-53 , 56 L.Ed.2d 18 (1978) (alleged violation of sixth amendment right to speedy trial not appealable before judgment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Dixon A/K/A Willie MacK Dick and Big Brother, Richard Hopkins and Gerald Hopkins-Bey, Intervenors. United States of America v. Nathaniel Williams A/K/A Nate, United States of America v. Donald Lewis, United States of America v. Johnnie Dentman A/K/A Ace, United States of America v. Delores Bennett, United States of America v. Noble Bennett A/K/A Turtle A/K/A Little Brother
Compare United States v. MacDonald, 435 U.S. 850, 861 , 98 S.Ct. 1547, 1553 , 56 L.Ed.2d 18 (1978) (order denying motion to dismiss based on right to speedy trial not final collateral order). 12 In addition, "a district court's order denying a defendant's motion to dismiss based on a claim of double jeopardy is appealable only if a colorable claim is made." United States v. Grabinski, 674 F.2d 677, 678 (8th Cir.) (banc) (per curiam) (Grabinski ), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 829 , 103 S.Ct. 67 , 74 L.Ed.2d 67 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pryba
(2×)
United States v. Zandi, 769 F.2d 229, 235 (1985); see also United States v. Steed, 674 F.2d 284, 286-89 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 829 , 103 S.Ct. 67 , 74 L.Ed.2d 68 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pryba
(2×)
United States v. Zandi, 769 F.2d 229, 235 (1985); see also United States v. Steed, 674 F.2d 284, 286-89 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 829 , 103 S.Ct. 67 , 74 L.Ed.2d 68 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald Brakke A/K/A Ron Brakke, and Chester Brakke
The orders on appeal here are pretrial orders, not final decisions, and therefore are not reviewable at this time. 3 “[DJenial of a motion to dismiss, even when the motion is based upon jurisdictional grounds, is not immediately reviewable.” Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 236 , 65 S.Ct. 631, 635 , 89 L.Ed. 911 (1945); see, e.g., United States v. Layton, 645 F.2d 681 (9th Cir.1981) (challenge to subject matter jurisdiction not appealable before trial); Hydraulic Press Manufacturing Co. v. Moore, 185 F.2d 800 (8th Cir.1950) (challenge to personal jurisdiction not appealable before tr…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thompson
v.
Wood
v.
Wood
No. 81-2178.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.