green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
14.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1992 ·
…issue preclusion does not attach unless it is clearly shown that the parties intended that the issue be foreclosed in other litigation.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1990 ·
…timeliness may not be disregarded in all cases regarding disqualification under 455(a).
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carter v. Carter (In Re Carter)
(2×)
issue preclusion does not attach unless it is clearly shown that the parties intended that the issue be foreclosed in other litigation.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Johnie M. Owens
(2×)
timeliness may not be disregarded in all cases regarding disqualification under 455(a).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lawson v. Nugent
Although the issue on appeal was whether the trial court acted properly in granting a remittitur, the court found that “the evidence supported] a finding that [plaintiff] suffered some emotional distress from [defendant’s] withdrawal from her case.” Id. at 124.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sims v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation
See Delesdernier v. Porterie, 666 F.2d 116, 121 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 (1982), (“[T]imeliness may not be disregarded in all cases regarding disqualification under § 455(a).”) (footnote omitted); Satterfield v. Edenton– Chowan Bd. of Ed., 530 F.2d 567 , 574–75 (4th Cir. 1975) (timeliness required in all recusal contexts).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lomas, R. v. Kravitz, J.
(2×)
See Delesdemier v. Porterie, 666 F.2d 116 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982) (motion untimely when judge made disclosure of relationship pre-trial and recusal motion was made for first time on appeal after two full trials); Potashnick v. Port City Construction Co., [ 609 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir.1980)] (grounds for recusal raised for first time on appeal not waived because it was not discovered until after trial); United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980) (cannot raise grounds for …
discussed
Cited "see"
Whidbey General Hosp. v. State
(2×)
See Culinary Workers & Bartenders Union, Local 596 v. Gateway Cafe, 91 Wash.2d 353, 372 , 588 P.2d 1334 (1979), aff'd on rehearing, 95 Wash.2d 791 , 630 P.2d 1348 (1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 87 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
All-Pure Chemical Co. v. White
See Culinary Workers & Bartenders Union 596 Health & Welfare Trust v. Gateway Cafe, Inc., 95 Wn.2d 791, 794 , 630 P.2d 1348 (1981), amended, 642 P.2d 403 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. United States
(2×)
See Yachts Amer- ica, Inc. v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 26, 29 , 673 F.2d 356, 359 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982). .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. H. Wailen York
(4×)
See Delesdernier v. Porterie, 666 F.2d 116, 121 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,675 W. Monroe Stephenson v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. And James E. Welch
(2×)
See Delesdernier v. Porterie, 666 F.2d 116 , 121—23 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982). 4 .
examined
Cited "see"
In Re Aov Industries, Inc. Appeal of Hubert R. Bruce
(4×)
It is within the discretion of the court of appeals, however, to make limited exceptions to this rule when “injustice might otherwise result.” Id. at 121 , 96 S.Ct. at 2877 (citation omitted); see Proctor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 675 F.2d 308, 326 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barber v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers
(2×)
See Yachts America, Inc. v. United States, 673 F.2d 356 , 230 Ct.Cl. 26 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1984) (consent decree, based on settlement agreement expressing clear intent to resolve issues once and for all, precluded relitigation of issue in prior suit); Green v. Ancora-Citronelle Corp., 577 F.2d 1380 (9th Cir.1978) (same); Harrison v. Bloomfield Building Industries, 435 F.2d 1192 (6th Cir.1970) (same); see also James, supra, at 193 (“Where the agreement upon which a consent judgment is based is fairly to be construed as providing that the parties…
discussed
Cited "see"
39 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1092, 39 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,825 Charles R. Barber v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers, District Lodge No. 57
(2×)
See Yachts America, Inc. v. United States, 673 F.2d 356 , 230 Ct.Cl. 26 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1984) (consent decree, based on settlement agreement expressing clear intent to resolve issues once and for all, precluded relitigation of issue in prior suit); Green v. Ancora-Citronelle Corp., 577 F.2d 1380 (9th Cir.1978) (same); Harrison v. Bloomfield Building Industries, 435 F.2d 1192 (6th Cir.1970) (same); see also James, supra, at 193 ("Where the agreement upon which a consent judgment is based is fairly to be construed as providing that the parties s…
examined
Cited "see"
Javier Sanchez-Espinoza v. Ronald Wilson Reagan, President of the United States
(4×)
See Proctor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 675 F.2d 308, 326 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
(4×)
See Delesdernier v. Porterie, 666 F.2d 116 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982) (motion untimely when judge made disclosure of relationship pre-trial and recusal motion was made for first time on appeal after two full trials); Potashnick v. Port City Construction Co., supra (ground for recusal raised for first time on appeal not waived because it was not discovered until after trial); United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980) (can not raise grounds for recusal for first time on …
cited
Cited "see"
Hemingway v. Ochsner Clinic
Accord, Delesdernier v. Porterie, 666 F.2d 116 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Hemingway v. Ochsner Clinic
Accord, Delesdernier v. Porterie, 666 F.2d 116 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trinity River Authority v. Williams
See Saucedo v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 670 F.2d 634 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 87 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982); Bond v. Otis Elevator Company, 388 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.1965); Ross Anglin & Son v. Brennan, 466 S.W.2d 832 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1971, no writ).
cited
Cited "see"
Carolyn Conley v. Board of Trustees of Grenada County Hospital
See Delesdernier v. Porterie, 666 F.2d 116, 124-25 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
(2×)
The Seventh Circuit has stated as follows: [I]f the parties to a consent decree “indicated clearly the intention that the de *804 cree to be entered shall not only terminate the litigation of claims but, also, determine finally certain issues, then their intention should be effectuated.” [Kaspar Wire Works, 575 F.2d] at 539; see also Yachts Am., Inc. v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 26 , 673 F.2d 356, 360-62 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982); 18 Charles A. Wright, Arthur R.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tuaolo v. Vaivao Fruean
See, e.g., Delesdernier v. Porterie, 666 F.2d 116, 118-123 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 835 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 , (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leslie v. Hart (In Re Hart)
(2×)
As stated in Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Eng’g & Mach., Inc., 575 F.2d 530 (5th Cir.1978), if the parties to a consent decree “indicated clearly the intention that the decree to be entered shall not only terminate the litigation of claims but, also, determine finally certain issues, then their intention should be effectuated.” Id. at 539 ; see also, Yachts Am., Inc. v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 26 , 673 F.2d 356, 360-62 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982); 18 C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alabama
(2×)
Illuminating Co., 503 F.Supp. 368, 381 (N.D.Ohio 1980) (quoting United States v. Conforte, 457 F.Supp. 641 , 654 n. 7 (D.Nev.1978), aff’d, 624 F.2d 869 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980)); see also Delesdernier v. Porterie, 666 F.2d 116 , 122 n. 4 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. The State Of Alabama
(2×)
Illuminating Co., 503 F.Supp. 368, 381 (N.D.Ohio 1980) (quoting United States v. Conforte, 457 F.Supp. 641 , 654 n. 7 (D.Nev.1978), aff'd, 624 F.2d 869 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 470 (1980)); see also Delesdernier v. Porterie, 666 F.2d 116 , 122 n. 4 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Francine Klingman v. Melvin E. Levinson
(2×)
As stated in Raspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Eng’g & Mach., Inc., 575 F.2d 530 (5th Cir.1978), if the parties to a consent decree “indicated clearly the intention that the decree to be entered shall not only terminate the litigation of claims but, also, determine finally certain issues, then their intention should be effectuated.” Id. at 539 ; see also Yachts Am., Inc. v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 26 , 673 F.2d 356, 360-62 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 839 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 81 (1982); 18 C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Delesdernier
v.
Porterie
v.
Porterie
No. 81-2372.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (2) · D. Connecticut (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.