Donnell v. United States, 459 U.S. 1204 (1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Donnell v. United States, 459 U.S. 1204 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1985 · …the missouri cases consistently construe an estoppel claim to have three elements: (1) an act or statement inconsistent with the right later asserted; (2) reliance on such act or statement; and (3) injury. ⚠ not in text
270 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 48 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: COMMONWEALTH v. HELLEN KIAGO (and nine companion cases ). (massappct, 2022-09-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) COMMONWEALTH v. HELLEN KIAGO (and nine companion cases ).
Mass. App. Ct. · 2022 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
e cannot say that the class of all participating in the medicaid program is a 'selective group inherently suspect of criminal activities
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Crow v. Newspaper Dealer Supply, Inc. (2×)
E.D. Mo. · 1985 · signal: see · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
the missouri cases consistently construe an estoppel claim to have three elements: (1) an act or statement inconsistent with the right later asserted; (2) reliance on such act or statement; and (3) injury.
discussed Cited "see" Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides v. Browner (2×)
D.D.C. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Donnell v. U.S., 682 F.2d 240, 251 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. de *66 nied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Pennsylvania v. Flaherty (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 245-49 (D.C.Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Guardians of Greater Pittsburgh, Inc., Individually and on Behalf of Its Members and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated National Association for the Advancement of Colored People-Pittsburgh Branch, Individually and on Behalf of Its Members and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated National Organization for Women-Southwestern Pennsylvania Council of Chapters, Individually and on Behalf of Its Members and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, and Donald Allen Benjamin Ashe Jerome Aziz Richard Hurt Adam Kinsel Lynwood Scott and Richard Stewart, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated J. Terese Doyle, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Cheryl Edmonds Rose Mitchum Linda Robinson Joanne Rowe Deborah Smith and Gloria Vanda, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Harvey Adams Mack Henderson Theodore Saulsbury and Charles Tarrant, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Gladys Smith, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Peter F. Flaherty, Mayor of the City of Pittsburgh and Acting Director of the Department of Public Safety of the City of Pittsburgh Robert J. Coll, Superintendent of the City of Pittsburgh Bureau of Police Stephen A. Glickman, President of the City of Pittsburgh Civil Service Commission Albert Statti and Edward L. English, Members of the City of Pittsburgh Civil Service Commission Melanie J. Smith, Secretary and Chief Examiner of the City of Pittsburgh Civil Service Commission and City of Pittsburgh, All Individually and in Their Official Capacities v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Fraternal Order of Police. (Intervenor in d.c.). Michael C. Slater v. City of Pittsburgh, a Municipal Corporation. Charles H. Boehm Paul G. Clark and Richard Usner, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Sophie Masloff, Mayor of the City of Pittsburgh Melanie J. Smith, Director of Personnel of the City of Pittsburgh the Pittsburgh Civil Service Commission and the City of Pittsburgh, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 245-49 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
cited Cited "see" In Re D.C. Sullivan & Co., Inc., Debtor. United States of America v. Robert Robinson, Etc.
1st Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Robinson v. Watts Detective Agency, 685 F.2d 729 (1st Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 1204, 103 S.Ct. 728 , 1191, 74 L.Ed.2d 953 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" James Adams v. Johns-Manville Corporation, and Raymark Industries, Inc. (2×)
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Medtronic, Inc. v. Benda, 689 F.2d 645, 661 (7th Cir.1982) (defendants’ defense of lack of consideration in action for specific performance did not convert equitable action into legal one), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Richard Bright D/B/A Augusta Dairies v. Land O'lakes, Inc. And Norris Creameries, Inc. (2×)
7th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Robinson v. Watts Detective Agency, Inc., 685 F.2d 729, 739 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 728 , 74 L.Ed.2d 953 and 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1191 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983)....
discussed Cited "see" Calvin F. Elmore v. United States (2×)
8th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Central Microfilm Service Corp. v. Basic/Four Corp., 688 F.2d 1206 , 1211 (8th Cir.1982) (“[W]hen no party has timely moved for a new trial, the ten-day limit is strictly enforced.”), cert denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1191 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983); see also, 6A J.
discussed Cited "see" Liquid Air Corporation v. Rogers (2×)
7th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Robinson v. Watts Detective Agency, Inc., 685 F.2d 729, 739 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 728 , 74 L.Ed.2d 953 and 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1191 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983). 7 IV.
discussed Cited "see" Universal Power Systems, Inc. v. Godfather's Pizza, Inc., (Two Cases) Universal Power Systems, Inc. v. Godfather's Pizza, Inc., (Two Cases) (2×)
8th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Central Microfilm Service Corp. v. Basic/Four Corp., 688 F.2d 1206, 1213-14 (8th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1191 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983). *672 The district court held that the purchase order was relevant to Universal’s damages because the jury could have concluded that had Godfather’s not breached its contract with Universal, Universal would have obtained an order for the same amount of goods as on the purchase order.
discussed Cited "see" In Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation. (Appeal of Attorneys' Fee Awards)" (2×)
2d Cir. · 1987 · signal: accord · confidence high
Id.; accord Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 251-52 (D.C.Cir.1982), cer t. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983); Chrapliwy v. Uniroyal, Inc., 670 F.2d 760, 768-69 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 956 , 103 S.Ct. 2428 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1983); Avalon Cinema Corp. v. Thompson, 689 F.2d 137, 140-41 (8th Cir.1982) (in banc).
discussed Cited "see" Wiedower v. ACF Industries, Inc. (2×)
Mo. Ct. App. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally, Central Microfilm Service Corp. v. Basic/Four Corp., 688 F.2d 1206, 1221 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1191 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983) (punitive damages under Missouri law supported by evidence in fraudulent inducement action); Crues v. KFC Corp., 729 F.2d 1145, 1153 (8th Cir.1984) (punitive damages under Missouri law supported by the elements of fraudulent misrepresentation action); Ross v. Holton, 640 S.W.2d 166, 173-74 (Mo.App.1982) (evidence showing elements of intentional interference with contract also sufficient to show legal malice).
examined Cited "see" In Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation" (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
E.D.N.Y · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240 , 255 n. 49 (D.C.Cir.1982) (“The special quality of one lawyer’s services provides no logical basis for granting all the lawyers a quality adjustment.”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983); Seigal v. Merrick, 619 F.2d 160,165 (2d Cir.1980) (suggesting that district court could award or withhold a multiplier based on relative productivity of legal theories propounded); In re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities Litigation, 438 F.Supp. 1303, 1337-38 (C.D.Cal.1977) (awarding different multipliers to different…
discussed Cited "see" Vaughan Morrill, Jr., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Becton, Dickinson and Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee (2×)
8th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Central Microfilm Service v. Basic Four Corp., 688 F.2d 1206 , 1213 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1191 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Articles of Drug Consisting of the Following: 5,906 Boxes, Etc., United States of America v. Alcon Laboratories (Puerto Rico), Inc. (2×)
1st Cir. · 1984 · signal: accord · confidence high
The standard for reviewing a judgment n.o.v. is similar if not identical: “The motion is properly granted only when, as a matter of law, no conclusion but one can be drawn.” Rios v. Empresas Lineas Maritimas Argentinas, 575 F.2d 986, 990 (1st Cir.1978); accord, Robinson v. Watts Detective Agency, 685 F.2d 729, 733 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 728 , 74 L.Ed.2d 953 and 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1191 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
examined Cited "see" Murray v. Weinberger (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
D.C. Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 251 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983); Copeland v. Marshall, 641 F.2d 880, 896 (D.C.Cir.1980) (en banc). .
discussed Cited "see" Mack v. Newton (2×)
5th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Robinson v. Watts Detective Agency, 685 F.2d 729, 737-38 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 728 , 74 L.Ed.2d 953 , 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1191 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983); Klein v. Tabatchnick, 610 F.2d 1043 , 1048 n. 4 (2d Cir.1979); Jackson v. Star Sprinkler Corp., 575 F.2d 1223 , 1234 (8th Cir.1978).
discussed Cited "see" Theodore MacK Receiver, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Wade Newton, Defendants-Third-Party Equico Lessors, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. G.J. Roberts, Sr., Third-Party Brazos Enterprises, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
3rd Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Robinson v. Watts Detective Agency, 685 F.2d 729, 737-38 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 728 , 74 L.Ed.2d 953 , --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 1191 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983); Klein v. Tabatchnick, 610 F.2d 1043 , 1048 n. 4 (2d Cir.1979); Jackson v. Star Sprinkler Corp., 575 F.2d 1223 , 1234 (8th Cir.1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Larry M. Bauer v. James J. Gilmartin (2×)
8th Cir. BAP · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Central Microfilm Serv. v. Basic/Four Corp., 688 F.2d 1206 , 1220(8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1191 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983). 8
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bauer v. Gilmartin (In Re Gilmartin) (2×)
8th Cir. BAP · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Central Microfilm Serv. v. Basic/Four Corp., 688 F.2d 1206 , 1220(8th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1191 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gray v. Millea (2×)
N.D.N.Y. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Second Circuit therefore has directed that the proper rule is for the district court to “consider the prevailing rates in the district in which the court sits.” Polk v. New York State Dep’t. of Correctional Servs., 722 F.2d 23, 25 (2d Cir.1983) (awarding attorneys’ fees under Section 1988); See also, Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 251 (D.C.Cir.1982), ce rt. den’d 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Walbrook Insurance Co., Ltd., Commercial Union Insurance Company v. National Casualty Co. (2×)
1st Cir. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Robirison v. Watts Detective Agency, Inc., 685 F.2d 729, 741 (1st Cir.1982), certs. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 728 , 74 L.Ed.2d 953 , 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1191 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." The County Of Cook v. Midcon Corporation (2×)
7th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Medtronic Inc. v. Benda, 689 F.2d 645, 649-50 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1106 , 103 S.Ct. 731 , 74 L.Ed.2d 955 , 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." County of Cook v. Midcon Corp. (2×)
7th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Medtronic Inc. v. Benda, 689 F.2d 645, 649-50 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1106 , 103 S.Ct. 731 , 74 L.Ed.2d 955 , 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Carolyn Grove, Warren Riddle, and Sylvia Riddle v. Mead School District No. 354, Carolyn Grove, Warren Riddle, and Sylvia Riddle v. Mead School District No. 354, and Mead Education Association, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant (2×)
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Seattle School District No. 1 v. State of Washington, 633 F.2d 1338, 1349-50 (9th Cir.1980), aff'd, 458 U.S. 457 , 102 S.Ct. 3187 , 73 L.Ed.2d 896 (1982); see also Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 245-49 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Grove v. Mead School District No. 354 (2×)
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Seattle School District No. 1 v. State of Washington, 633 F.2d 1338,1349-50 (9th Cir.1980), aff’d, 458 U.S. 457 , 102 S.Ct. 3187 , 73 L.Ed.2d 896 (1982); see also Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 245-49 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 251-252 (D.C.Cir.1982) (Wilkey, J., writing for a unanimous court) ("some attorneys may receive fees based on rates higher than they normally command if those higher rates are the norm for the jurisdiction in which the suit was litigated”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Brown v. Bolger (2×)
D.D.C. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 254 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983); Environmental Defense Fund v. Environmental Protection Agency, 672 F.2d 42 , 60 (D.C.Cir.1982); Sierra Club v. Gorsuch, 684 F.2d 972 (D.C.Cir.1982), reversed on other grounds, 462 U.S. 680 , 103 S.Ct. 3274 , 77 L.Ed.2d 938 (1983). 11 In Copeland III the court considered this form of adjustment noting that “if the ‘lodestar’ itself is based on present hourly rates, rather than the lesser rates applicable to the time period in which the services were …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." James T. Crues, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Kfc Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant (2×)
8th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Central Microfilm Service v. Basic/Four Corp., 688 F.2d 1206 , 1221 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1204 , 103 S.Ct. 1191 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983) (punitive damages under Missouri law supported by evidence in fraudulent inducement action); Ross v. Holton, 640 S.W.2d 166, 173-74 (Mo.App.1982) (evidence showing elements of intentional interference with contract also sufficient to show legal malice).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hall v. City of Auburn
D. Me. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Donnell v. United States, 682 F.2d 240, 245-51 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1190 , 75 L.Ed.2d 436 (1983) (intervenors on side of United States in a successful suit entitled to fee award if they contributed substantially to success of litigation); E.E.O.C. v. Sage Realty Co., 521 F.Supp. 263, 269-70 (S.D.N.Y.1981) (intervenors entitled to attorneys’ fees to the extent that attorneys’ work does not duplicate that of government counsel); E.E.O.C. v. Murphy Motor Freight, supra, 488 F.Supp. at 389 (intervenors entitled to fees).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Donnell
v.
United States
No. 82-915.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1983.
459 U.S. 1204
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 76%
Citer courts: E.D. Missouri (2) · Massachusetts Appeals Court (1)

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.