green
Positive treatment
9.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Washington v. Lambert
In determining the severity of the intrusion and the aggressiveness of the police action, we have stated, “handcuffing substantially aggravates the intrusiveness of an otherwise routine investigatory detention and is not part of a typical Terry stop.” United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir.1982) cert. denied 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446, 447 (1983); see also Del Vizo, 918 F.2d at 825 (use of handcuffs important factor in determining that an arrest had occurred).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7855, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,034 George Washington Darryl Hicks v. Skystone-Eagle Lambert City of Santa Monica, and Bob Grant
See, e.g., Charles N. Jamison, Jr., Racism: The Hurt That Men Won't Name, Essence, Nov. 1992 at 64; Patrick, Have Americans Forgotten?. 27 Did the Police Arrest Washington and Hicks? 28 In determining the severity of the intrusion and the aggressiveness of the police action, we have stated, "handcuffing substantially aggravates the intrusiveness of an otherwise routine investigatory detention and is not part of a typical Terry stop." United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir.1982) cert. denied 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446, 447 (1983); see also Del Vizo, 918 F.2…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Rhodes v. State
E.g., United *249 States v. Smith, 3 F.3d 1088, 1094-95 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 733 , 126 L.Ed.2d 696 (1994); United States v. Sanders, 994 F.2d 200, 205-08 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 408 , 126 L.Ed.2d 355 (1993); United States v. Merkley, 988 F.2d 1062, 1064 (10th Cir.1993); United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446, 447 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7457, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,783 Bryant Allen v. City of Los Angeles, and Melanie Singer Timothy Singer Paul Beauregard Gabriel Aid Frank Schulz
See Sharpe, 470 U.S. at 683 , 105 S.Ct. at 1574 (no arrest when defendant detained 20 minutes for questioning); Parr, 843 F.2d at 1231 (placing defendant in patrol car did not constitute an arrest); United States v. Alvarez, 899 F.2d 833, 838 (9th Cir.1990) (no arrest when defendant ordered out of car at gunpoint), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1024 , 111 S.Ct. 671 , 112 L.Ed.2d 663 (1991); United States v. Buffington, 815 F.2d 1292, 1300 (9th Cir.1987) (no arrest when defendants "forced from their car and made to lie down on wet pavement at gunpoint"); United States v. Taylor, 716 F.2d 701 (9th Cir.…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Allen v. City of Los Angeles
See Sharpe, 470 U.S. at 683 , 105 S.Ct. at 1574 (no arrest when defendant detained 20 minutes for questioning); Parr, 843 F.2d at 1231 (placing defendant in patrol car did not constitute an arrest); United States v. Alvarez, 899 F.2d 833, 838 (9th Cir.1990) (no arrest when defendant ordered out of ear at gunpoint), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 1024 , 111 S.Ct. 671 , 112 L.Ed.2d 663 (1991); United States v. Buffington, 815 F.2d 1292, 1300 (9th Cir.1987) (no arrest when defendants “forced from their car and made to lie down on wet pavement at gunpoint”); United States v. Taylor, 716 F.2d 701 (9th…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Alexander v. County of Los Angeles
In United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1288-89 (9th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446, 447 (1983), we found that handcuffing a suspect does not automatically turn a lawful investigative stop into a de facto arrest.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6816, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,715 Jerry Alexander Tyrone Brown v. County of Los Angeles, and Brian Wilson Harry Toluchanian Orlando Atencio David Smiley, Jerry Alexander Tyrone Brown, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. County of Los Angeles Orlando Atencio Brian Wilson Harry Toluchanian David Smiley Philip Solano, Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees
In United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1288-89 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446, 447 (1983), we found that handcuffing a suspect does not automatically turn a lawful investigative stop into a de facto arrest.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Marenghi
Even if a person is not under arrest he or she can nonetheless be "in custody." Although brief detentions, such as those permitted under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), "`do not usually involve the type of police dominated or compelling atmosphere which necessitates Miranda warnings,'" United States v. Streifel, 781 F.2d 953, 958 (1st Cir.1986) (quoting United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1291 (9th *215 Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446, 447 (1983)), a person subjected to a Terry stop "must be advised of [her] Mira…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Gonzalez
See, e.g., U.S. v. Bengivenga, 845 F.2d 593, 597-600 (5th Cir.) (en banc ) (“a Fourth Amendment seizure does not necessarily render a person in custody for purposes of Miranda ") (holding admissible defendant’s statements made during Terry stop and prior to Miranda warnings), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 306 , 102 L.Ed.2d 325 (1988); U.S. v. Streifel, 781 F.2d 953, 957-62 (1st Cir.1986) ("As a general rule, Terry stops do not implicate the requirements of Miranda____”) ("That [defendants] were asked to turn their motors off and step out of their vehicles ... did not render them…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Ginger A. Miller, United States of America v. Toni A. Hampton, United States of America v. Jay L. Nash
See, e.g., United States v. Laing, 889 F.2d 281, 285 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1790 , 108 L.Ed.2d 792 (1990); United States v. Crittendon, 883 F.2d 326, 329 (4th Cir.1989); United States v. Hastamorir, 881 F.2d 1551, 1557 (11th Cir.1989); United States v. Glenna, 878 F.2d 967, 971-73 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446, 447 (1983); United States v. Puny, 545 F.2d 217, 220 (D.C.Cir.1976). 5 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Billy Joe Simpson
United States v. Ware, 897 F.2d 1538, 1542 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2629 , 2630, 110 L.Ed.2d 649 , 650 (1990); United States v. Bruscino, 687 F.2d 938, 940 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 1228, 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 1235, 75 L.Ed.2d 446, 468 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Dempsey v. Town of Brighton
See, e.g., United States v. Glenna, 878 F.2d 967, 972 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289-90 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446, 447 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chavez-Rivas v. Olsen
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 158 (3d Cir.1982) (citing Braden for principle that a § 2241 habeas petition “must be sought from a District Court with jurisdiction over the custodian of the prisoner”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Friedland
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 154-55 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); United States v. Dansker, 581 F.2d 69, 72 (3d Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Friedland, David J. Friedland, in No. 95-5582. David Friedland v. Douglas Lansing, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Ft. Dix, Nj United States Parole Commission David J. Friedland, in No. 95-5583. David Friedland v. United States of America, David J. Friedland, In
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 154-55 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); United States v. Dansker, 581 F.2d 69, 72 (3d Cir.1978). 28 Friedland's use of old Rule 35(b) was a particularly blatant violation of the time constraint policy of the rule because in the motion he relied on his efforts to implement his "program" as a basis for a reduction of sentence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dancy v. Department of the Army
See Laswell v. Brown, 683 F.2d 261, 267-68 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); Dorman v. Thornburgh, 740 F.Supp. 875, 879 (D.D.C.1990), dismissed in part and aff'd in part on other grounds, 955 F.2d 57 (D.C.Cir.1992); Kline v. Republic of El Salvador, 603 F.Supp. 1313, 1317 (D.D.C.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Joanne Kotler, Individually and as Administratrix, Etc. v. The American Tobacco Company
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 157 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Edmond v. United States Postal Service
See Laswell v. Brown, 683 F.2d 261, 268 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); Seibert v. Baptist, 594 F.2d 423, 428 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 918 , 100 S.Ct. 1851 , 64 L.Ed.2d 271 (1980); Kline v. Republic of El Salvador, supra, 603 F.Supp. at 1316-1317 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez-Zayas
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 152 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez-Zayas
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 152 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983). 17 The government's reliance on Sec. 3742 is misplaced.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mack Arthur Young
See United States v. Bruscino, 687 F.2d 938 (7th Cir.1982) (en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William P. Jack
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 158 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1982); Block v. Petter, 631 F.2d 233 , 235 n. 1 (3d Cir.1980); see also Zannino v. Arnold, 531 F.2d 687 , 689 n. 5 (3d Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roscoe Emory Dean, Jr., in Re United States of America
(2×)
Id.; accord, United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 151 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); United States v. DeMier, 671 F.2d 1200 , 1204 n. 12 (8th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Scher Presents, Inc.
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 152-54 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied sub nom., Matthews v. United States, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983). 3 As purely legal entities, corporations present a special case.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Scher Presents, Inc.
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 152-54 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied sub nom., Matthews v. United States, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983). .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dictado
See State v. Grisby, 97 Wn.2d 493, 497-98 , 647 P.2d 6 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 75 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bohrmann v. Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co.
See, e.g., Laswell v. Brown, 683 F.2d 261, 269 (8th Cir.1982) (concluding that “lawsuit for personal injuries cannot be based only upon the mere possibility of some future harm”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); Johnston v. United States, 597 F.Supp. 374, 425-26 (D.Kan.1984); Bubash v. Philadelphia Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maas v. United States
See also Laswell v. Brown, 683 F.2d 261, 265 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983) (same); Lombard v. United States, 690 F.2d 215, 221 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1118 , 103 S.Ct. 3086 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1983) (same); Gaspard v. United States, 713 F.2d 1097, 1100-01 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 975 , 104 S.Ct. 2354 , 80 L.Ed.2d 826 (1984) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Turner
See also, United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286 (9th Cir.1982) (holding that robbery suspects found on likely escape route, meeting description of robbers and dressed inappropriately for the weather may be stopped) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
M.M.H. v. United States
See, e.g., Laswell v. Brown, 524 F.Supp. 847 (W.D.Mo.1981), aff'd, 683 F.2d 261 (8th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); Sweet v. United States, 528 F.Supp. 1068, 1073-75 (D.S.D.1981), aff'd, 687 F.2d 246 (8th Cir. 1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ricardo D.
In Holtz-man, we held that manual restraints and a show of authority were justified by the officer’s belief that Holtzman was attempting to flee. 871 F.2d at 1502 ; see also United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir.1982) (handcuffs permissible when defendant kept pacing and looking as if he was about to run), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bois v. Marsh
Mollnow, 716 F.2d at 627 ; Jaffee, 663 F.2d at 1234-35 ; see also Laswell v. Brown, 683 F.2d 261, 265 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); Broudy v. United States, 661 F.2d 125 , 127 n. 4 (9th Cir.1981); Thornwell v. United States, 471 F.Supp. 344, 348 (D.D.C.1979); Levin v. United States, 403 F.Supp. 99, 104 (D.Mass.1975); Rotko v. Abrams, 338 F.Supp. 46 (D.Conn.1971), aff'd per curiam, 455 F.2d 992 (2d Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Captain Joyce L. Bois v. John O. Marsh, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Army Captain Joyce L. Bois v. John O. Marsh, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Army
Mollnow, 716 F.2d at 627 ; Jaffee, 663 F.2d at 1234-35 ; see also Laswell v. Brown, 683 F.2d 261, 265 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); Broudy v. United States, 661 F.2d 125 , 127 n. 4 (9th Cir.1981); Thornwell v. United States, 471 F.Supp. 344, 348 (D.D.C.1979); Levin v. United States, 403 F.Supp. 99, 104 (D.Mass.1975); Rotko v. Abrams, 338 F.Supp. 46 (D.Conn.1971), aff'd per curiam, 455 F.2d 992 (2d Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Guadalupe Magana
See also United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); United States v. Heredia-Castillo, 616 F.2d 1147, 1149 (9th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Innovative Construction Systems, Inc., Debtor-Appellant
This is a recognition of the trial judge’s superior ability, vis a vis an appellate court, by virtue of having heard the evidence, and observed the jury first hand, to assess the fairness and competence of the jury’s award. 12 Abernathy, 704 F.2d at 971 ; see also United States v. Bruscino, 687 F.2d 938, 940-41 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Guadalupe Magana
See also United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); United States v. Heredia-Castillo, 616 F.2d 1147, 1149 (9th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bennett v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.
(2×)
See also Laswell v. Brown, 683 F.2d 261, 269 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); Mink v. University of Chicago, 460 F.Supp. 713, 719 (N.D.Ill.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
35 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1521, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,759 Mary Jane Stubbs, as Administratrix of the Estate of Dawn Maxine Stubbs v. United States of America and Drill Sgt. Sookdeo
See, e.g., Laswell v. Brown, 683 F.2d 261 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); Miller v. United States, 643 F.2d 481 (8th Cir.1981) (en banc); Chambers v. United States, 357 F.2d 224 (8th Cir.1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stubbs v. United States
See, e.g., Laswell v. Brown, 683 F.2d 261 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1210 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); Miller v. United States, 643 F.2d 481 (8th Cir.1981) (en banc); Chambers v. United States, 357 F. 2d 224 (8th Cir.1966).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Laswell
v.
Weinberger, Secretary of Defense
v.
Weinberger, Secretary of Defense
No. 82-5574.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1983.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.