green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.0 score
“there is no first amendment protection for furnishing with predatory intent false information to an administrative or adjudicatory body.”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 42 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
But see Sierra On-Line, Inc. v. Phoenix Software, Inc., 739 F.2d 1415, 1419 (9th Cir.1984) (a Rule 59(e) motion for reconsideration is valid for purposes of tolling the time to appeal, “even if it raises no new grounds but ‘simply rehashes arguments heard at trial’ ...” (quoting Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., 690 F.2d 1240, 1249 (9th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983))). 1 It is well-established that a proper Rule 59(e) motion may urge a court to reconsider or vacate a prior judgment.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lewis v. Leo Buk Lhu
there is no first amendment protection for furnishing with predatory intent false information to an administrative or adjudicatory body.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sykes Laboratory, Inc. v. Kalvin
it is the source-denoting function which trademark law protects and nothing more.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Wise v. Commonwealth
Looking to the “entire voir dire rather than the single answer and question”, Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth, 223 Va. 615, 628 , 292 S.E.2d 798, 805 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 *326 (1983), we uphold the trial court’s finding that McKinney was qualified to sit on this jury.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronald P. Berton v. Commonwealth of Virginia
See Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth, 223 Va. 615, 632 , 292 S.E.2d 798, 808 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 (1983) (the terms “defile” and “sexually molest” are interchangeable within the meaning of Code § 18.2-48).
cited
Cited "see"
SMC Promotions, Inc. v. SMC Promotions
See, Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, 611 F.2d 296, 300-02 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Ward v. Commonwealth
See Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth, 223 Va. 615, 630 , 292 S.E.2d 798, 806 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Softman Products Co., LLC v. Adobe Systems, Inc.
See Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, 611 F.2d 296, 300-02 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Lilly v. Commonwealth
See Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth, 223 Va. 615, 630 , 292 S.E.2d 798, 807 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morrissey v. Virginia State Bar
(2×)
See Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth, 223 Va. 615, 635 , 292 S.E.2d 798, 810 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 , 103 S.Ct. 1235 , 75 L.Ed.2d 469 (1983) (defendant can be convicted of multiple offenses arising out of same transaction if legislature clearly indicates its intent to impose multiple punishments).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sessions Tank Liners, Inc. v. Joor Manufacturing, Inc.
(2×)
See Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, 690 F.2d 1240 , 1261-62 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983); see also California Motor Trans., 404 U.S. at 512-13, 92 S.Ct. at 612-13 (recognizing that, in various fora, sanctions are imposed for deliberate misrepresentations). 42 PG & E recognizes, however, that the very existence of a tort action for the seeking of valid governmental action exerts an undesirable chilling effect on the access of others to government, regardless of the motives of the particular party before the court.
cited
Cited "see"
Talbert v. Commonwealth
See Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth, 223 Va. 615 , 292 S.E.2d 798 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 (1983); Spain v. Commonwealth, 7 Va. App. 385 , 373 S.E.2d 728 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Meagher v. Lamb-Weston, Inc.
See Christofferson v. Church of Scientology, 57 Or.App. 203 , 215 n. 9, 644 P.2d 577 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1206 , 103 S.Ct. 1196 , 75 L.Ed.2d 439 , 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Thompson
See Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., 690 F.2d 1240, 1248-49 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sessions Tank Liners, Inc. v. Joor Manufacturing, Inc.
See Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., 690 F.2d 1240, 1261-62 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983) (deliberate misrepresentations of fact to an adjudicatory body or to an administrative body for anticompetitive purpose not entitled to first amendment protection).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sisneros v. City of Laramie
(2×)
Accord United States v. Bruscino, 687 F.2d 938, 940-41 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 , 103 S.Ct. 1235 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983) (discussing same standard of review for F.R.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dugger v. Adams
(2×)
See Daugherty v. State, 419 So. 2d 1067 (1982) (direct appeal), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 1228 (1983); Daugherty v. State, 505 So. 2d 1323 (first Rule 3.850 motion), cert. denied, 484 U. S. 891 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Oliver Hornung, A/K/A John O. Green
(2×)
See United States v. Bruscino, 687 F.2d 938, 940-41 (7th Cir.1982) (en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 , 103 S.Ct. 1235 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983); Miller v. United States, 403 F.2d 77 , 83 n. 11 (2d Cir.1968); see also 3 J.
cited
Cited "see"
Gray v. Commonwealth
See Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth, 223 Va. 615, 630 , 292 S.E.2d 798, 806-07 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.
See Clipper Express v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, 690 F.2d 1240, 1263 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Simms v. Commonwealth
See Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth, 223 Va. 615, 632 , 292 S.E.2d 798, 808 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 (1983) (the terms “defile” and “sexually molest” are interchangeable within the meaning of Code § 18.2-48).
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See Clipper Express v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., 690 F.2d 1240 , 1259-60 n. 29 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin v. Warden, Virginia State Penitentiary
See Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth, 223 Va. 615, 632 , 292 S.E.2d 798, 808 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 (1983), wherein the words “sexually molest” were held to be interchangeable with the word “defile.” Petitioner relies upon Taylor v. Commonwealth, 207 Va. 326 , 150 S.E.2d 135 (1966) to support his position that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to quash the indictment.
cited
Cited "see"
Hopkins v. Commonwealth
See Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth, 223 Va. 615, 630-31 , 292 S.E.2d 798, 807 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
U.S. Dominator, Inc. v. Factory Ship Robert E. Resoff
See Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., 690 F.2d 1240 , 1259 n. 29 (9th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
U.S. Dominator, Inc. v. Factory Ship Robert E. Resoff
See Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., 690 F.2d 1240 , 1259 n. 29 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Kemp
See Johnson v. Zant, 249 Ga. 812 , 295 S.E.2d 63 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 , 103 S.Ct. 1236 , 75 L.Ed.2d 469 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Rossner v. CBS, INC.
See Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, 611 F.2d 296 , 301 n. 2 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Colville Confederated Tribes v. Boyd Walton, Jr., Et Ux
See Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff, 690 F.2d 1240 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., Nintendo of America, Inc.
See Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, Inc., 684 F.2d 1316, 1323-26 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983); Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 263-64 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. The City of Oakland, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation
See Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff, 690 F.2d 1240 , 1257 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eastern Air Lines Inc. v. New York Air Lines, Inc.
See Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, 684 F.2d 1316, 1322-23 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983) (finding that “ Monopoly” is generic even though over 55 per cent of the public has come to associate the product with the producer Parker Brothers).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Foster v. State
See, e.g., Daugherty v. State, 419 So.2d 1067, 1070 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 , 103 S.Ct. 1236 , 75 L.Ed.2d 469 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gasho v. United States
See, e.g., Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., 690 F.2d 1240 (9th Cir.1982) (there is “no reason” to distinguish administrative process from judicial process), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John R. Gasho, Sr. Sharon L. Gasho v. United States of America Northrop Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, John R. Gasho, Sr. Sharon L. Gasho Millardair, Ltd., a Canadian Corporation v. William L. Ball Roger Mannhalter John J. Howe, Jr.
See, e.g., Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., 690 F.2d 1240 (9th Cir.1982) (there is "no reason" to distinguish administrative process from judicial process), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983). 72 We need not decide whether, under Arizona law, an abuse of process claim may be based on an administrative abuse.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bbca, Inc., John B. Ellering James L. Noske, Intervenor Below, Joan M. Noske, Intervenor Below v. United States
Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(b)(1); see also, e.g., Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, 690 F.2d 1240 , 1248-49 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phillips v. Federal Deposit Insurance (In Re Phillips)
Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b); see also Clipper Express v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., 690 F.2d 1240 , 1250 n. 14 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ralcon, Inc. v. United States
Thus, even where an amendment “is technically a different cause of action from that presented originally,” it will relate back to the original pleading as long as “it is sufficiently closely related to warrant the conclusion that the government received adequate notice of the possibility that it might have to defend against a broader claim.” Id. at 588 , 372 F.2d at 961 ; see also Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., 690 F.2d 1240 , 1259 n. 29 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983); Martin v. Virgin Islands National…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Booker v. Israel
(2×)
See also United States v. Bruscino, 662 F.2d 450 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 , 103 S.Ct. 1235 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burr v. State
See, e.g., Stevens v. State, 419 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228 , 103 S.Ct. 1236 , 75 L.Ed.2d 469 (1983); Hoy v. State, 353 So.2d 826 (Fla. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 293 , 58 L.Ed.2d 265 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. Walters
See also Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, 690 F.2d 1240 , 1252-64 (1982) (en banc) (Noerr-Pennington doctrine, which has source in First Amendment right to petition, applies to attempts to influence administrative bodies as well as legislative bodies), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1227 , 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983); Stern v. United States Gypsum, Inc., 547 F.2d 1329 (7th Cir.1977), right to petition protects complaint about IRS agent’s professional conduct to his superiors, cert. denied, 434 U.S. 975 , 98 S.Ct. 533 , 54 L.Ed.2d 467 (1977); International Union UAW …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park and Fly, Inc.
In Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, 611 F.2d 296 (9th Cir.1979), we said: “[T]he [challenged] trademark is valid only if ‘the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer.’ ” Id. at 302 (quoting Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co., 305 U.S. 111, 118 , 59 S.Ct. 109, 113 , 83 L.Ed. 73 (1938)); see also Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, Inc., 684 F.2d 1316, 1319 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied,U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1234 , 75 L.Ed.2d 468 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Haas
v.
Hash et ux.
v.
Hash et ux.
No. 82-1125.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1983.
Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.
Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.