green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.5 score
“his claim is not so frivolous that it should not be tested in a plenary hearing under the legal standards established by the protocol”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings
(2×)
But see United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1133 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983) (informal immunity not per se unlawful). 13 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rolando Lopez Chavez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
his claim is not so frivolous that it should not be tested in a plenary hearing under the legal standards established by the protocol
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Saccoccio
In that case we held that the indictment of two defendants failed because "a RICO conspiracy count must -11- -11- charge as a minimum that each defendant agreed to commit two or more specified predicate crimes." Id. at 1136.
examined
Cited "see"
Littlejohn v. State
(4×)
See Lambert, 888 P.2d at 502 , citing Campbell v. State, 1981 OK CR 136 , 636 P.2d 352 , cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983). "[T]estimony from lay persons who have observed the defendant's behavior and communicative abilities is proper, provided the observations are reasonably proximate in time to the competency trial." Lambert, 888 P.2d at 502 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dupre
(2×)
However, no due process violation exists "so long as the investigation of witnesses is not prompted by the possibility of the witnesses testifying, and so long as the government does not harass or threaten them." Whittington, 783 F.2d at 1219-20 ; see United States v. Fricke, 684 F.2d 1126, 1130 (5th Cir.1982) (finding no due process violation when prosecution told witnesses, during trial, that they were subjects of grand jury investigation), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 480 (1983). 53 The record here does not support appellants' charges of prosecutorial intimidati…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Woodmere Investors Limited Partnership
See Debtor's Exhibit 12. 22 .See, e.g., Frieders v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 687 F.2d 224 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011, 103 S.Ct. 1251 , 75 L.Ed.2d 480 (1983). 23 .See Transcript at 744-745. 24 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Viola
(2×)
See United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 1250, 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983); United States v. Elliott, 571 F.2d 880, 906-07 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 953 , 99 S.Ct. 349 , 58 L.Ed.2d 344 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Viola
(2×)
See United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 1250, 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983); United States v. Elliott, 571 F.2d 880, 906-07 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 953 , 99 S.Ct. 349 , 58 L.Ed.2d 344 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cory Thomas Jones
See United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1139-40 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 (1983); United States v. Burnett, 582 F.2d 436, 438 (8th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mavroules
(2×)
See United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1 Cir., 1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983); United States v. Angiulo, 847 F.2d 956 , 964 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 138 , 102 L.Ed.2d 110 (1988); United States v. Habicht, 766 F.Supp. 22, 25-27 (D.Mass., 1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald David Owen, United States of America v. Harold Owen, United States of America v. Brian Joseph Pack
See United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1153-54 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 (1983). 9 Appellants have not demonstrated that the government's failure to furnish them a copy of the court interception order and its application frustrated the purposes of the act or that the government deliberately ignored its procedures.
examined
Cited "see"
Shelton v. State
(4×)
See Campbell v. State, 636 P.2d 352 (Okl.Cr.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Estate of Arthur S. Kraus, Deceased, Renee Kraus v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Estate of Frieders v. Commissioner, 687 F.2d 224, 228 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1251 , 75 L.Ed.2d 480 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zola v. Gordon
(2×)
It is not sufficient to allege that Wagner “conspired with others to engage through an enterprise in a pattern of racketeering activity of predicate acts committed by others.” Id.; accord United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981) (“a RICO conspiracy count must charge as a minimum that each defendant agreed to commit [personally] two or more specified predicate crimes”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983); see also Grunwald v. Bornfreund, 668 F.Supp. 128, 133 (E.D.N.Y.1987) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Banks v. State
(2×)
See Campbell v. State, 636 P.2d 352, 357 (Okl.Cr.1983), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983); Sizemore v. State, 499 P.2d 486, 488 (Okl.Cr.1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Plunkett v. State
See Burrows v. State, 640 P.2d 533 (Okl.Cr.1982), cert, denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 480 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sun Ship, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Matson Navigation Co., and Cross-Appellant
See Kane Gas Light & Heating Co. v. International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers, 687 F.2d 673 , 682-83 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1251 , 75 L.Ed.2d 480 (1983); Mobil Oil Corp., 679 F.2d at 305 .
cited
Cited "see"
United Steelworkers of America, District 36, Local 8249 v. Adbill Management Corp.
See Kane Gas Light & Heating Co. v. International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers, Local 112, 687 F.2d 673 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1251 , 75 L.Ed.2d 480 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Nos. 83-3490, 83-3491
See Kane Gas Light & Heating Co. v. International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers, Local 112, 687 F.2d 673 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1251 , 75 L.Ed.2d 480 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elisida Zavala-Bonilla v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Stevic v. Sava, 678 F.2d 401, 406 (2d Cir.1982), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983) (conditions in country of origin relevant to issue of “well-founded fear of persecution”); cf. Martinez-Romero v. INS, 692 F.2d 595 (9th Cir.1982) (holding that evidence of general oppressive conditions in country to which alien would be deported is not sufficient standing alone to preclude deportation; “some” special circumstances need be present).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jannotti, Harry P. Schwartz, George X. Appeal of Harry P. Jannotti, in No. 83-1093. Appeal of George X. Schwartz, in No. 83-1094
(2×)
Accord United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Exhibitors' Service, Inc. v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.
See Spray-Rite Service Corp. v. Monsanto Co., 684 F.2d 1226 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
examined
Cited "see"
MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
(3×)
See Spray-Rite Service Corp. v. Monsanto Co., 684 F.2d 1226, 1242 (7th Cir.1982), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983); In re IBM Peripheral EDP Devices Antitrust Litigation, 481 F.Supp. 965 , 1013 (N.D.Cal.1979), appeal docketed, No. 80-4048 (9th Cir. Jan. 31, 1980); Van Dyk Research Corp. v. Xerox Corp., 478 F.Supp. 1268, 1316 (D.N.J.1979), aff’d, 631 F.2d 251 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981); SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp., 463 F.Supp. 983, 1018-20 (D.Conn.1978), remanded for further proceedings, 599 F.2d 32 (2d Cir.19…
cited
Cited "see"
Okoroha v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Stevic v. Sava, 678 F.2d 401 (2d Cir.1982), cert, granted,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Okoroha v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Stevic v. Sava, 678 F.2d 401 (2d Cir.1982), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Flores
(2×)
Under this definition, courts have explained that truthfulness provisions do not con- stitute impermissible vouching when they merely ‘‘reveal that the witnesses had an obligation to testify truthfully and explain the consequences of a breach of that obligation.’’ United States v. Bowie, 892 F.2d 1494, 1499 (10th Cir. 1990); see also United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1134 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S. Ct. 1250 , 75 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peter Noone
(2×)
Yet even as to that theory it is well settled that the court “need not give instructions in the precise form or language requested by the defendant.” United States v. Beltran, 761 F.2d 1, 11 (1st Cir.1985); Gibson, 726 F.2d at 874 ; United States v. Morris, 700 F.2d 427, 433 (1st Cir.1983); see also United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1146 (1st Cir.1981) (“A trial judge is under no obligation to deliver a requested instruction verbatim.”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dennis E. Pryba, Phe, Inc., Amicus Curiae. United States of America v. Barbara A. Pryba, Phe, Inc., Amicus Curiae. United States of America v. Educational Books, Inc., Phe, Inc., Amicus Curiae. United States of America v. Jennifer G. Williams, Phe, Inc., Amicus Curiae
(2×)
Read in context, section 1962(d) makes it unlawful to conspire to conduct or participate in the conduct of an enterprise's affairs, where its affairs are conducted through a pattern of racketeering activity."); see also United States v. Kragness, 830 F.2d 842, 859 (8th Cir.1987). 77 The First and Second Circuits have adopted appellants' view in United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984) and United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick Wayde Mealy and Lance B. Spotts
(2×)
See also United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1133-34 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lee
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1133 (1st Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983); United States v. Librach, 536 F.2d 1228, 1230 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 939 , 97 S.Ct. 354 , 50 L.Ed.2d 308 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Airlines Reporting Corp. v. Barry
(2×)
See also United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983); United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 394 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 943 , 949, 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. State
See also, Davis v. State, 665 P.2d 1186, 1203-1204 (OkL.Cr.1983), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 865 , 104 S.Ct. 203 , and Burrows v. State, 640 P.2d 533, 544 (Okl.Cr.1982), cert, denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 480 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cartwright v. Maynard
See also, Burrows v. State, 640 P.2d 533 (Okl.Cr.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 480 (1983), (where the defendant killed his pregnant wife in front of their young son.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cartwright v. Maynard
See also, Burrows v. State, 640 P.2d 533 (Okl.Cr. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 480 (1983), (where the defendant killed his pregnant wife in front of their young son.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gordon
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1133 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983); United States v. Librach, 536 F.2d 1228, 1230 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 939 , 97 S.Ct. 354 , 50 L.Ed.2d 308 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard A. Whittington, Richard Wolfe and W. Lewis Demoss, Jr., Defendants
See also United States v. Thomas, 488 F.2d 334 (6th Cir.1973) (defense witness intimidated by remarks by assistant United States attorney). 24 . 684 F.2d 1126 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 480 (1983). 25 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGraw Edison, Wagner Division v. Local 1104, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio
See also, Kane Gas Light & Heating v. International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers, Local 112, 687 F.2d 673 , 678 *489 (3rd Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1251 , 75 L.Ed.2d 480 (1983). (“We hold that a labor arbitrator’s award does ‘draw its essence from the collective bargaining agreement’ if the interpretation can in any rational way be derived from the agreement viewed in light of its language, its context, and any other indicia of the parties’ intention.”) However, we find no need to decide today whether we should adopt this rule because, even if we did, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Terry Dee Snider, United States of America v. Billy Gene Reneau, United States of America v. Sheri L. Able
The Court first found the operation was a RICO enterprise. 2 The Court then found a single conspiracy is also indicated “where, as here, the RICO enterprise has one major goal which is accomplished through a predictable routine and where the enterprise has an infrastructure marked by a continuous existence.” Id. at 1203 ; see also United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120 , 1136 n. 25 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Battle v. Watson
See also Spray-Rite Service Corp. v. Monsanto Co., 684 F.2d 1226, 1234 (7th Cir.1982) (Spray-Rite), cert. granted,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jeffrey B. Battle Karen Battle D/B/A Bayview Service and Supply Co. And Anchor Supply Co., Inc. v. Gordon Watson and Thomas Watson v. The Lubrizol Corporation Jenkin-Guerin, Inc. And Jack K. Krause
See also Spray-Rite Service Corp. v. Monsanto Co., 684 F.2d 1226, 1234 (7th Cir.1982) (Spray-Rite ), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983). 9 Moreover, I also agree with the statement that "a manufacturer's termination after receiving complaints cannot be characterized in and of itself as responsive action permitting an inference of concerted action." Battle, at 1240; Roesch, at 1237.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Goldenberg
v.
United States (two cases)
v.
United States (two cases)
No. 81-1389.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 28, 1983.
Cited by 144 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.